Everyone can aid in the improvement of GPT-4 with OpenAI Evals

Along with the Gpt-4 release, the company has also open-sourced OpenAI Evals to help improve the LLM. Users will be able to report shortcomings which will help drive further improvements.
OpenAI revealed its latest language model a couple of days ago, and it is currently the hottest topic on the internet. However, the company didn't only release GPT-4 but also open-sourced its software framework, OpenAI Evals. This move will speed up the solution of possible issues that might come to light after certain benchmarks and evaluations.
we are open-sourcing OpenAI Evals, our framework for automated evaluation of AI model performance, to allow anyone to help improve our models.
— Sam Altman (@sama) March 14, 2023
The company uses Evals to guide the development of its LLMs in identifying shortcomings and preventing regressions. Now that it is an open-source software framework, users can apply it to track performance across model versions and product integrations. As an example, the blog post said that Stripe had used it to complement their human evaluations to measure the accuracy of their GPT-powered documentation tool.
OpenAI Evals will be helpful for further improvements
"Because the code is all open-source, Evals supports writing new classes to implement custom evaluation logic. In our own experience, however, many benchmarks follow one of a few "templates," so we have also included the templates that have been most useful internally (including a template for "model-graded evals"—we've found that GPT-4 is surprisingly capable of checking its own work). Generally, the most effective way to build a new eval will be to instantiate one of these templates along with providing data. We're excited to see what others can build with these templates and with Evals more generally," says the post.
The company has also invited everyone to use OpenAI Evals to test its models. This will be beneficial for both sides as OpenAI will improve its product while developers and other customers will have a better experience with better features.
Unfortunately, OpenAI will not be giving any fees to contributors. However, the company plans to grant GPT-4 access to those who contribute "high-quality" benchmarks. Check the official GitHub page if you want to contribute to OpenAI Evals.
ChatGPT's recent fame and success might shape the future. Microsoft has already invested heavily in OpenAI, and other tech giants are also trying to stay in the race. Google might launch Bard at this year's I/O event. Besides, Apple reportedly briefed its employees last month that engineers have been working on a large language model and other AI tools.
On the other hand, OpenAI Evals might help the company solve issues faster and have the upper hand against other companies in the AI race.
Advertisement
Uhh, this has already been possible – I am not sure how but remember my brother telling me about it. I’m not a whatsapp user so not sure of the specifics, but something about sending the image as a file and somehow bypassing the default compression settings that are applied to inbound photos.
He has also used this to share movies to whatsapp groups, and files 1Gb+.
Like I said, I never used whatsapp, but I know 100% this isn’t a “brand new feature”, my brother literally showed me him doing it, like… 5 months ago?
Martin, what happened to those: 12 Comments (https://www.ghacks.net/chatgpt-gets-schooled-by-princeton-university/#comments). Is there a specific justifiable reason why they were deleted?
Hmm, it looks like the gHacks website database is faulty, and not populating threads with their relevant cosponsoring posts.
The page on ghacks this is on represents the best of why it has become so worthless, fill of click-bait junk that it’s about to be deleted from my ‘daily reads’.
It’s really like “Press Release as re-written by some d*ck for clicks…poorly.” And the subjects are laughable. Can’t wait for “How to search for files on Windows”.
> The page on ghacks this is on represents the best of why it has become so worthless, fill of click-bait junk…
Sadly, I have to agree.
Only Martin and Ashwin are worth subscribing to.
Especially Emre Çitak and Shaun are the worst ones.
If ghacks.net intended “Clickbait”, it would mark the end of Ghacks Technology News.
Ghacks doesn’t need crappy clickbaits. Clearly separate articles from newer authors (perhaps AIs and external sales person or external advertising man) as just “Advertisements”!
We, the subscribers of Ghacks, urge Martin to make a decision.
because nevermore wants to “monetize” on every aspect of human life…
“Threads” is like the Walmart of Social Media.
How hard can it be to clone a twitter version of that as well? They’re slow.
Yes, why not mention how large the HD files can be?
Why, not mention what version of WhatsApp is needed?
These omissions make the article feel so bare. If not complete.
Sorry posted on the wrong page.
such a long article for such a simple matter. Worthless article ! waste of time
I already do this by attaching them via the ‘Document’ option.
I don’t know what’s going on here at Ghacks but it’s obvious that something is broken, comments are being mixed whatever the article, I am unable to find some of my later posts neither. :S
Quoting the article,
“As users gain popularity, the value of their tokens may increase, allowing investors to reap rewards.”
Besides, beyond the thrill and privacy risks or not, the point is to know how you gain popularity, be it on social sites as everywhere in life. Is it by being authentic, by remaining faithful to ourselves or is it to have this particular skill which is to understand what a majority likes, just like politicians, those who’d deny to the maximum extent compatible with their ideological partnership, in order to grab as many of the voters they can?
I see the very concept of this Friend.tech as unhealthy, propagating what is already an increasing flaw : the quest for fame. I won’t be the only one to count himself out, definitely.
@John G. is right : my comment was posted on [https://www.ghacks.net/2023/08/23/what-is-friend-tech/] and it appears there but as well here at [https://www.ghacks.net/2023/07/08/how-to-follow-everyone-on-threads/]
This has been lasting for several days. Fix it or at least provide some explanations if you don’t mind.
> Google Chrome is following in Safari’s footsteps by introducing a new feature that allows users to move the Chrome address bar to the bottom of the screen, enhancing user accessibility and interaction.
Firefox did this long before Safari.
Basically they’ll do anything except fair royalties.