Crystal Anti-Exploit Protection new security software released
The new security software Crystal Anti-Exploit Protection has just been released in a first beta version. The program adds another layer of defense to the system that protects applications that it protects from a number of exploits that they may be vulnerable for.
Update: Please note that the program and the developer website are no longer available. We suggest you use programs that offer a comparable feature set such as Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit or the built-in Windows Defender on Windows 10. End
It is not a replacement for antivirus software, other security software or common sense, but can protect the system from exploits that target vulnerabilities that have not been fixed yet.
Crystal Anti-Exploit Protection is available for 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 at the time of writing. It requires the Microsoft .Net Framework 2.0 on the system and administrative privileges.
How does it work?
CrystalAEP operates by running within every instance of a protected program (for example the web browser), performing checks at key points within the program's life-time in an attempt to ensure that it is not under attack. Crystal also alters the behaviour of protected programs to render them more difficult targets for malicious software seeking to be installed on a user's system - if the vulnerable program malware is targeting is in an unknown and constantly changing state many traditional methods for exploiting flaws within the software are made significantly more difficult.
The program protects a number of high profile processes automatically after you have installed it. This includes web browsers such as Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Firefox, Acrobat Reader, Excel, VLC or Winamp. The protection level is set to minimum, the lowest available level by default to avoid issues when running the programs on the system.
- Minimum – Provides only the basic protection, none of which should be invasive or disrupt delicate programs. This mode provides a backstop against some classes of threat and is surprisingly effective considering the limited features that it enables, but is not recommended for most programs as little is done to disrupt exploit attempts.
- Moderate – A good improvement on Minimum, this mode aims to provide a compromise between reliability and security, erring on the side of reliability. This mode is recommended for applications which do not cope well with the High mode of protection, but is otherwise not recommended.
- High – Provides an equal balance between reliability and security. Most of the particularly effective anti-exploit techniques are enabled when using this mode. This is the recommended mode for most users.
- Maximum – This mode provides the highest level of protection which Crystal affords, enabling nearly all of the protection features the product can offer. Occasionally Maximum protection provides too locked-down an environment for flexible programs to operate under, and is therefore not recommended above High for most users. Maximum can be enabled for systems for which security is absolutely paramount above software reliability.
You can click on Configuration > Basic Options to modify the protection levels, or add running or installed programs to the list of protected applications. It is possible to configure different protection levels for processes, so that high profile applications like Java, Firefox or Internet Explorer run on a higher level than programs like SnagIt or Wordpad.
You can alternatively open the Expert Options and configure the protection methods for each process in greater detail. Only users who know what they are doing should bother to make changes to these features as they require a great deal of security know how.
There is also a content filtering option, but it is not selected by default, and only available for Microsoft's Internet Explorer.
The program displays the most recent alerts in the main program window. Here it is also possible to enable realtime alerts and to disable the protection that it provides.
A good start to get to know the program is to read the excellent user manual in pdf format that it ships with. Here you find information about an introduction to the program and its configuration modes. Each expert setting is displayed here, and the explanations should be enough to give you a basic understanding of what they do.
You may run into issues with some programs after installation. The developer recommends that basic users should start with the minimum protection settings first to avoid these issues. He recommends that experienced users set the level to high before switching to the expert options to modify the settings further.
Closing Words
The program is not a run and forget type of program. You will spend some time configuring processes on your system. The developer has added the basic options mode for inexperienced users who want to add some level of extra protection to their system. And while that's working well to a certain degree, the real strength only becomes visible in the program's advanced options and higher protection levels. It is definitely a program to keep an eye on.
Advertisement
The full quote is:
“The content is not stored or seen by any human unless donated as part of the feedback mechanism.”
How much time before that data collection and processing become consentless, like Microsoft likes to do ?
“Another way you can help refine this feature is to donate your actual emails so we can analyze their contents and improve the quality of suggestions in the future.”
*Pukes*
Am I the only one that wishes that MS would instead focus on fixing some of the more glaring issues with their software before implementing silly new gimmicks like this?
Outlook still loves to hang for several seconds at a time if there’s any issue accessing a mailbox (particularly a problem if you have several mailboxes open, or if your VPN connection temporarily drops). Quite why the server processing seems to share the same thread as the UI is beyond me.
I’m also sick of the recent bug in Outlook that won’t let you attach a document to an e-mail if it is open in another window. Thus forcing me to close the spreadsheet, attach it, then re-open it again. Weirdly, if it is in the “recent” list, it will attach without complaint.
Add onto this the horrible, cluttered interface in Outlook these days (so much white space and other huge elements) that make e-mail navigation a pain on a small screen and I can’t help think that fixing basic issues like these and improving the accessibility of the programs should be a far higher priority than a feature which 99% of people will probably just disable.
I want them to fix Windows 95. Instead, they flounder along with “upgrades” until they realize … oh, look: that “evolved” into an unfixable mess … lets “move on” to make a new shiny OS, and leave another bit of debris and more abandoned users in our wake.
This article is about Open Office, which is not connected to Microsoft.
Open Office is connected to this article about LibreOffice .. unless its about how you shouldn’t use OO..
Good for people who can’t spell This feature could be very annoying.
I will be turning this feature off, when it comes out for Word. I have been typing for decades, and know what I want. Having predictions come up regularly is a real pain and distraction. So I turn them off in email and on my iPhone and iPad.
I agree with Matthew B – after the latest Windows update, Word started doing this and it’s incredibly annoying. I can touch-type so I don’t need the predictions – it creates errors and slows me down.
Thanks Martin. The suggestions were annoying and sometimes inappropriate. I told Microsoft about it. I wanted to disable the suggestions and now I have. Good information.
I see the option in Outlook web and it is turned on, but I see no evidence of it actually working as I type a new email.
and fix the issue of search. search has been about the worst thing MS ever did in Outlook & since moving to the title bar has not improved and the fact default searches now are FROM: is bonkers /rant
this new feature is sh*t; it’s like a rearview camera (actually, its way worse, but the analogy is coming): the machines are taking over our need for intelligent thought.
But honestly, MSFT really ought to run focus groups that include people who have ADHD or photosensitive epilepsy. For us, this attempt to help productivity only significantly decreases it.
(It feels like we are all being treated to a dose of that brainwashing technique you see on the SyFi channel that involves a lot of flashing lights and images)
the worst part about any of this: that our comments, reactions, suggestions, thoughts… are never actually heard or acknowledged by any of these tech companies who just shove new crap onto our corporate PCs and don’t think twice about end user experience.
sorry y’all, rant over. for now.
I absolutely hate this feature. Thank you so much for the how-to to turn it off. Now that you pointed it out, I will know to check the tiny bar in the left corner, but I spent time I shouldn’t have had to trying to turn this feature off before finding your post.
I think “features” like this should be opt-in, not opt out, or should be much easier to find to turn off. And I agree with the suggestions above – there are plenty of other issues Microsoft needs to fix before adding “helpers” like this. One that wasn’t mentioned above – terrible grammar in the suggested grammar fixes. As often as they’re right, they’re wrong. And the database programmers need to learn the use of apostrophes…. Thanks for the rant space. :)
Thank you for posting this where I could find it and use it after an MS Office update today.
Sadly, this nonsense is the same thing I see my company implementing and me coding for them: window-dressing trinkets that are this year’s Christmas toys that everyone needs to be told that they want, while data-integrity code defects go un-addressed because no salesperson can make a commission off of us publishing their correction.
Our society is evolving, and being run by a generation that learned to communicate in broken grammar on their smartphone while nursing a five-second attention span.
They _want_ the machine to think for them. It is so much easier than thinking for one’s self.
Abdication of personal responsibility.
Corporate America is only too willing to step in, for a modest fee and your privacy.
We aren’t going to get Microsoft or anybody else to stop. There’s far too much money to be made at it.
As above, thanks for the rant space.
We will survive this, somehow.
So, Microsoft wants to use what we type to improve AI while charging me a hefty annual price for Office 365 subscriptions. Then someday AI will tell me what to see, think and do and its happening already. Someone needs to get a hold of the monster and put it back in the pit.
How will they profit from improving AI?
Thanks for this article, this behavior started on my machine yesterday no doubt a sneaky effect of an update. It was easy to fix using your instructions, but I suspect Word and Outlook are still “phoning home” everything I type even though the predictive text is shut off.
They think we’re all stupid. They should be paying us.
Thank you for the resourceful article! I looked for the status bar entry, but I couldn’t find it in the web version of Microsoft Word. What I did find, however, was Editor (between Dictate and Designer) above the opened document, and the option to disable suggested text was in there. Scroll down to Text Predictions and click the item’s “button” to turn this annoying feature off. I think Off should be default. I hate when developers set defaults for items they think I need. Adobe is another company that does that when people want or need to download the free or pro version of its Acrobat PDF Reader. I often tell my students to uncheck the boxes next to the McAfee antivirus and Chrome extension options before downloading the reader because they likely do not need them. I think these options should be unchecked by default. Let the consumers make up their own minds.
Thanks so much for telling us how to disable this intrusive feature – predictive text! It’s like having a know-it-all teacher always looking over your shoulder. Very irritating!
I can appreciate why some people would love this feature, and in some cases it makes sense where time is more critical. But it should not be the default.
Unfortunately, it seems to me that the programmers job is made simpler when the human conversation is simpler. Predictive text, if used, limits the conversation to a box only as big as a programmers imagination and literary ambition. I know a lot of programmers. Imagination is not their strong suit – no offense to creative programmers intended. Broadly speaking, to predict the manner in which I prefer to speak would require far more resources than they would ever allocate.
If it were up to me they would go the opposite direction as a software company. I want a far simpler interface with basic editing function and attachments. Anything more than that is a distraction and I can honestly say, totally ignored and certainly a distraction making me wish I wasn’t on outlook.
In the end, I disable nearly every “improvement” Microsoft offers, and check “metered connection” to prevent it’s downloads from happening in the middle of mastering a single for a customer. Of course that is not supposed to happen but we all know how real life works.
Ill pay 5x what they are charging if they strip it down to an OS that works as a background product and doesn’t need the internet and isn’t of bloatware. That OS would be pure gold, worth every penny.
Grateful to have found out how to turn it off. If this is how good AI is supposed to be then we’re in worse trouble than I thought.
Microsoft, and they’re not the only ones guilty of this, need to stop “giving us nice things” without asking us *FIRST* whether we want it or not.
I am sick to death of finding some new app running on my machine that I didn’t see before, didn’t ask for, and didn’t authorize. Then I look up on the web and it’s 15 steps to get rid of it. Christ, it wasn’t hardly ANY steps to get it!!
A true annoyance. I couldn’t believe this feature when it appeared and after tolerating it for a few days I did a ‘net search for disabling it. I’m a writer by trade and living, and this is antithetical to creation, whether fiction or non. In my mind, it reflects the whole dumbing down of this generation – it can give someone the appearance of being articulate, only to discover that they are anything but upon first meeting (or interview). Beware.
Thanks for the tip on how to turn it off, was the first hit when I looked it up. I’m not really willing to slow down and check what suggestions they offer me as someone who can type 115 wpm ?
Predictive text has sprung up on the desktop version and this article does not address that version. There is no “Text Predictions” on the desktop version to turn on or off.
I finally figured out how to turn it back off!! when it starts to add the prediction hover the mouse over the prediction and it will take you to ‘text prediction’ and you can deselect it.
Why ANYONE would want this is a question that boggles the mind.
It is VERY clear to me that every time the programmers have some lovely little hack they like, they are convinced ALL of us would like them. Not. I’m with what Bill said last July – I would pay a HUGE amount for a version of Word that would just stay the same and do what I want and that doesn’t have a bunch of bells and whistles that aren’t necessary. Please!!!!
Thank you!! I looked in vain in the too-full and too-many “Options” screens for a way to turn off this annoyance.
I wish there was a Notepad-on-caffine mode — not the wannabe one-size-fits-all unstable multimedia-editor-on-crack mode that might change erratically from day to day.
There are too many bells and whistles in Word. Remember WordPerfect? It behaved like traditional software: Do this until I tell you to do otherwise — and the current settings were visible in an optional “codes” pane. Instead, Word buries formatting, styles and who knows what else in the paragraph marker. If I want to change the format of something, it may presume to change all similar items in both directions in the document. Feh!!!
Back to your excellent post: thank you for letting know how turn off this unwanted “help” from the presumptuous twenty-somethings at M$.
The status bar toggle removes the annoyance in the current document, but it may be baaaack in a new document.
There is perhaps a more permanent way to dispose of this annoyance:
In the “File” menu, choose “Options”
Then in “Advanced” pane (listed at the left of the options), navigate to the “Editing options” section.
In that long list of micro-text, uncheck the box “Show text predications while typing.”
My hope is that this will get rid of “just one of the intrusive PITAs.”
The navigation above is for Word in Microsoft 365 Apps running on a desktop machine.
YMMV in other versions, and these instructions may be broken when M$ spews another “upgrade” of the version I am using on this machine.
Just noticed this was turned on, presumably by business IT admin. It’s atrocious, not at all usable, like Google’s is. Instead of accepting my typed words, it refused to allow me to add a space between words as I typed, instead waiting for me to accept or reject the suggested words. So unintuitive it’s not funny. Turned it off immediately.
You need to *right* click on the thingy in the status bar; left click brings up the Options dialog, and if this predictive typing thing is on the options dlg, I sure can’t find it. Right click brings up a long, unorganized (afaict) list of options that you can check or un-check, and somewhere in that long list is predictive typing.
I’m not sure how you’d turn predictive completion back on if you decided you want it, but that’s someone else’s problem.
Now if they’d only fix automatic number, which has been broken in every version of Word I’ve ever used.
The abruptness of it popping up and diverting my attention from my flow of thoughts is very distracting. I tried it for a short while and quickly decided it was slowing me down, making me stutter in my thoughts, and just generally getting in my way. I type plenty fast on a PC. Now on current phones with screen typing that is slow and prone to typos, yeah, you might want some predictive stuff to survive there. But I still do not want anybody snooping my info, so there is that.
How are you suppose to read this article when the adds are constantly popping up where I am reading and no matter how many times I knock them down, they return with the same message. Most times with a video that is over what i was reading. I am certain this article was helpful but I will never know because I got fed up with the ads that were trying to pull me away. One just popped up here because I am telling you about it.
What’s up with this place? All I can see in the comment sections of new articles are VERY OLD (as in several years) comments.
And my comment, posted in one article, is posted in a completly different one…
Very strange. This is the second time this week where there is a disconnect between the article and its comments!
I have had LibreOffice 7.6 for over a week. The only fault that I can find is that the help function still does not work in Ubuntu. It tries to find a web page that does not exist. This occurs in both the menu function of help and pressing F1.
I found this in earlier versions of 7.x, and reported it, but was brushed off.
I think it works in Windows, but I am not sure.
Did you download and install the separate optional help package, that does not come with the base package ? If not, I wouldn’t wonder.
Interesting. Article about Libre Office, but comments on MS and Word, dating back to sometime in 2021. Who’s in charge here?
LibreOffice is great. Some of our customers are still using outdated MS Office versions. With there okay, we install it and set the saved file formats to MS, Writer font as Calibri. About 90% still use it years later. The ones that don’t typically require Microsoft 365 for work.
Notepad2 is all I find myself using these days.
Notepad ? Why don’t you use Vi ? (well or Vim if necessary)
Notepad as nearly as terrible and unnecessarily feature-bloated as Emacs.
But if you are truly hardcore, you’d use ed or edlin and nothing else.
No, not Notepad, Notepad2, which is a completely different application. On top of that Notepad2 is a Windows only application, so mentioning Linux text editors like Vi(m), Emacs, ed and edlin does not really make sense.
In the past I didn’t like LibreIffice but after they improved a few things in 7.4 and 7.5 I actually like it and use it. Mostly Writer. In terms of features it is much better than any other software of this kind except MS Office. In terms of customization it seems the best. Guys who prefer minimalism may use OnlyOffice, but work is way more comfortable and productive in LibreOffice. As for questionable improvements, Libre gets them but as long as I can turn new features off I don’t really mind.
Comments are broken or something. Oldest is from February 22, 2021. :S
And the MAIN PROBLEM is that the software is not working, my intention was that I would download a video from a specific website and it worked, but when I tried to get another video, it stoppend to work and it is not working at all, Would you have any idea, what a mistake I am doing . Thanks