A website should not be able to read the the history of websites that a user visited previously. An ingenious CSS hack and some spicy Javascript is however enough to use a trial and error method to find out if a user has been to specific websites.
Some webmasters use this method to display the social bookmarking and news batches of websites that their visitors have been through which is very effective in gaining popularity on those websites.
Others came up with a script that is using this method to estimate if the visitor is male or female. The Javascript makes use of the Quantcast Top 10K websites and the male:female ratio that they provide plus a neat algorithm to compute the percentages for male and female likeliness.
Mine turned out 50/50 because I don’t use the history at all. Good luck and let me know what the script thinks about your gender..
The same principle could possible be used to display targeted advertisements. Have been to a lot of parenting websites lately? How about parenting ads? Like sports? How about an ESPN subscription? It’s a bit scary, don’t you think?
Related posts:
Display Firefox Browsing History With History TreeManage Firefox Web Browser Form History
Record and Share your browser history with Hooeey
Typealizer: What Type is That Blog
Block Websites From Appearing In Firefox History
Speed Up Firefox By Limiting The History
Safe Cache and History for Firefox
Pep up the Firefox History
7 Responses to “Male or Female? Your Browser’s History Might Tell”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
-
[...] Via | gHacks [...]
-
[...] seem to be becoming increasingly popular. Some analyze your browsing history to tell you if you are male or female while others analyze websites and tell you what kind of person you [...]
50/50 for me too, though I have a concequent firefox history :/
Likelihood of you being FEMALE is 54%
Likelihood of you being MALE is 46%
Odd… :)
Likelihood of you being FEMALE is 2%
Likelihood of you being MALE is 98%
Hehe :D Mine top male sites:
Site Male-Female Ratio
thepiratebay.org 2.13
leftlanenews.com 2.23 ^^
96% Male
Too much software portals… :) And the method is seriously cool and clever.
I had 100% of being female… news to me seeing as I’m a guy. The method might be cool but perhaps there’s some assumptions made on how ‘male’ or ‘female’ a site is?