Mozilla has added Pocket, a "save for later" service, to Firefox recently. I love Firefox. It is my web browser of choice because it gives you more customization options and control than any other browser out there.
I do value Mozilla's work on the browser and think they have made a great job at catching up to Chrome when it comes to performance or memory usage.
Sometimes however, I question decisions made by Mozilla and the integration of Pocket in Firefox is one of them. Pocket was a third-party service when Mozilla integrated it into Firefox; that has changed in the meantime with Mozilla's acquisition of Pocket. Still, Pocket is only useful to some users and that is better handled by add-ons in my opinion.
If you are running Firefox, you may have noticed a new icon in the browser's address bar. The Pocket icon integrates the service in Firefox.
A click on the icon displays options to sign up for Pocket or sign in to a Pocket account if you are a user of the service already.
While you can hide the Pocket entry in the address bar, it won't disable Pocket in Firefox.
For that, you need to do the following
This disables Pocket in Firefox and the icon should be gone once you restart the browser.
Please note that you may end up with an "View Pocket List" entry in the bookmarks menu when you disable Pocket this way.
If you want to get rid of the bookmarks menu entry as well, you need to handle things slightly different.
This hides the bookmarks menu entry as well.
If you choose to use the Pocket feature, the impact on Firefox’s performance or memory use is minimal, similar to opening Pocket in a new tab in Firefox. For users who choose not to use the feature and remove the button from their toolbar, the impact is reduced even further.
The integration is bad for several reasons if you ask me. The most obvious reason is that the service is not useful to some -- I would say the majority -- of Firefox users but is still deployed for all by default.
This is a shotgun approach that is going to annoy Firefox users who don't plan on using Pocket.
It is puzzling that Mozilla went the direct integration way as there is already a Pocket extension for Firefox that interested users can install.
Even if it is for testing purposes, e.g. integration of Firefox accounts with third-party services, it should be offered to users as an optional component and not something that is baked in.
Mozilla has been working on a feature called Reading List which works similar to Pocket but made the decision to put Reading List on the backburner to integrate Pocket instead in the browser. This seems wrong on many levels, Reading List does not rely on third-party services for instance.
This is going to be another PR nightmare for Mozilla in the end. Users are already complaining about the integration on sites like Reddit, and while some welcome the integration, the vast majority of commenters dislike it or put it in words that I cannot possibly print here on Ghacks.
There seems to be a disparity between what Mozilla does and what Firefox users want, and the integration of Pocket is just the latest feature that highlights that.Advertisement
Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.
We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.
If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.