Multiple Browser Bundling With Windows Is Stupid - gHacks Tech News

Multiple Browser Bundling With Windows Is Stupid

A recent article published on the website of the Wall Street Journal suggests (paywall) that EU officials are considering forcing Microsoft to include a bunch of web browsers in the Windows operating system to dilute the advantage that Internet Explorer has over the competition.

This could lead to Microsoft having to add third-party web browsers to the installation of the operating system, or to offer users choices during installation to download and install third-party web browsers.

This poses some interesting questions: who decides which web browsers to include in the offer?

The list should probably include the most popular third-party browsers compatible with the operating system (which are Firefox, Google Browser, Safari and Opera at the time of writing).

But what about other niche browsers? What if the makers of Lynx, Arachne or Sleipnir want their web browsers included as well?

This opens Pandora's Box and will confuse the average Joe more than anything else. Many regular Windows users do not even know which version of the operating system they are running. How are they supposed to make a decision between 5, 10 or 20 of different web browsers that are displayed to them as choices when they run the setup, or load the system for the first time after unpacking it.

How would the EU suggest to keep web browsers up to date? They would lock out users without Internet connection if they would make the decision to download the web browser during installation.

If web browsers come bundled, these may need an update immediately after installation. Not all web browsers perform automatic update installations though and it is unclear how this would be handled.

Experienced users on the other hand will not benefit from this proposal as well. One of the first tasks of many after installing Windows on a computer is to download a different web browser to avoid having to use Internet Explorer.

If the EU forces Microsoft into doing this they should also force the developers of other operating systems to do the same. Force Apple to include Internet Explorer as an alternative, force Linux distributions to display other web browsers as an option.

But there is another thing that needs to be discussed. Why stop with web browsers? What about developers of calculators, media players, task managers or text editors? Should not they have the same right of inclusion if web browser companies get it?

It is without doubt true that Microsoft did use the power of their operating system to distribute Internet Explorer. Today, a new web browser is only a few clicks away and the success of the Firefox web browser shows that it is possible to be successful even without being distributed with an operating system.

I personally think something should have been done back in the last century when Microsoft began distributing Internet Explorer with Windows. What's your take on the issue?

Summary
Article Name
Multiple Browser Bundling With Windows Is Stupid
Description
An article published on the website of the Wall Street Journal suggests that EU officials are considering forcing Microsoft to include a bunch of web browsers in Windows.
Author
Publisher
Ghacks Technology News
Logo

We need your help

Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.

We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.

If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:

Comments

  1. Roman ShaRP said on May 31, 2009 at 1:45 pm
    Reply

    I agree, this bundling is stupid. I’m avoiding MS browser since 2000, and IE bundling in Windows never was big obstacle for me.

    AFAIK, Firefox popularity in some EU countries are around 40% and even higher. So, what they want?

  2. Paulus said on May 31, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    Reply

    I myself think that its a (ferry) great idea that the EU are ordering to stop Microsoft, to monopolize the (browser/player/o.s., etc.) market. And there (the EU) are now trying to find the best way to do it. Give the some credit (time) to find a perfect way to do it. I think a (small) book (.pdf) where there is a short explanation from what every browser, who is on the web, does, by a independent consumer organization is a ferry good idea. Next to that a short start up guide from that same brouwser would not take much effort.

  3. Sensaes said on May 31, 2009 at 2:36 pm
    Reply

    “Today a new web browser is only a few clicks away and the success of the Firefox web browser shows that it is possible to be successful even without being distributed with an operating system.”

    *Cough*Ubuntu*Cough*Xandros*Cough*

    *I personally think something should have been done back in the last century when Microsoft began distributing Internet Explorer with Windows.”

    *Cough*Windows95*Cough*Windows98*Cough* (The LAST times the EU tried to get Micro$oft to ‘unbundle’ IE from the OS.)

  4. Imran Hussain said on May 31, 2009 at 3:06 pm
    Reply

    Today, browsers. Tomorrow, media players. Than, Windows Explorer. They have alternatives for everything, so will the EU go after all of them to support competition? Ridiculous!

  5. Khan Furqan said on May 31, 2009 at 3:38 pm
    Reply

    Agree Ridiculous !!!

  6. Rarst said on May 31, 2009 at 4:58 pm
    Reply

    Political stuff that is neither close to real life or worth attention.

    There will always be users who use IE just because it comes with Windows. End of story. :)

  7. Salz` said on May 31, 2009 at 4:58 pm
    Reply

    “…I think a (small) book (.pdf) where there is a short explanation from what every browser…” Erm? Sorry? Are you suggesting an proprietary file format? Oh, and proprietary software from Adobe (didn’t they have an monopol on PDF?)? Sure, the reader is free right now.

    @Martin: you forget that Microsoft should remove cmd and allow alternatives like bash/zsh/etc.

  8. Xbot said on May 31, 2009 at 9:51 pm
    Reply

    Yeah but more stupid is people still using internet explorer we all know it’s the worst browser outhere.

  9. Robert Palmar said on May 31, 2009 at 10:07 pm
    Reply

    This is the nanny state run amok.
    Only a child is comforted by being treated like a child..

  10. anthony said on June 1, 2009 at 2:38 am
    Reply

    We do not force Ford to include the option of installing Dodge parts in a truck, why then should we force Microsoft to offer a competitor’s product with their own? Anyone who wants a new browser can get one for free off of the Internet.

  11. rruben said on June 1, 2009 at 12:00 pm
    Reply

    I doubt it helps. The average joe will choose Explorer anyway.

    The funny thing is that if one click on explorer and you give them the choice to choose a version: IE6, IE7 and IE8. A lot of people will probably choose IE6 because they also use that one on their work.

    If you then ask them why they made that decision they will say they don’t want a newer version because all the buttons are on a different place. It’s confusing, they don’t like that.

    It’s stupid, but that’s the sad reality. A lot of people like innovation, as long as they don’t have to deal with it.

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.