ADVERTISEMENT
Wikipedia is a great service to look up things you are interested in or want a deeper understanding of. While it may not be 100% accurate on everything, it does offer a solid starting point for research or getting an overview on many topics.
Wikipedia stays true to the encyclopedic nature of the site by throwing pages of texts and lots of links at you when you open an article. While you find an occasional picture as well thrown in, it is usually just text and links that it makes available.
That may not discourage users from using the site, but it does not mean that the layout, design and presentation could not be better.
That's the premise of the WikiWand project. It takes Wikipedia articles and modernizes to improve their readability by a mile.
Here is how it works:
You either visit the WikiWand website directly, type in a search term and select one of the results that it makes available to load the modernized design of the article, or you install the Chrome extension which redirects Wikipedia links automatically to WikiWand.
Here is an example, first the original Wikipedia article and then the modernized WikiWand version of the same article.
Here is a list of core changes that WikiWand introduces:
In addition to all of that, loading times are faster as well. According to the creators of WikiWand, up to three times as fast under certain circumstances. I did not really notice any speed improvements but that is likely because I'm using a fast Internet connection. If you are on a slower line, you may very well notice improvements in this regard.
WikiWand provides you with the means to switch to another language easily at the top of the screen. This needs to be done if you want to search the site (and thus Wikipedia) in a different language than the default language English).
Some options, such as printing the article, editing it or downloading it as a pdf file, are still available as well but link to Wikipedia when selected. You find them located under the dropdown menu at the top.
If you spend time on Wikipedia regularly you may like what WikiWand has to offer. It improves the readability of Wikipedia articles quite a bit without sacrificing any of the information in the process. Thumbs up.
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.
Bookmarklet Challenge: please someone ?
Came up with this one :
javascript:(function(){var%20wl=window.location,l=wl.host.split(‘.’)[0],h=wl.href.split(‘/’);window.location=’http://www.wikiwand.com/’+l+’/’+h[h.length-1];})();
(extracts the language part of the original wikipedia url, then the article part and rewrites the location towards a direct wikiwand url).
Excellent. Very well done N. you are a star. Thnx
Thumbs down from me. WikiWand looks far worse than Wikipedia- the Windows 8 looks and feel is abominable. I can download any Wikipedia article in different formats, I can convert it, I can customize its look using browser tools. Why should I tolerate the highly intrusive message to install WikiWand add-on? No, WikiWand’s flat look that totally ignores the articles’ structure is simply abominable. For me WikiWand is absolutely nauseating.
^^ +1
Personally I have my own userstyle to create a “dark” theme (more like darkish gray with pastel text for headers, various types of links in blue, pink or red), and to remove some elements for a cleaner look.
I do however like the idea of the contents in the sidebar :)
I’m using this, it’s called WikiEd to edit and write some articles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cacycle/wikEd
Nothing is perfect but works quite good for me and does what I want. :)
Mediawiki doesn’t need a frontend upgrade, it needs a backend one. It’s annoying to set up as most things you have to edit into config files, no addon manager etc. Just ancient compared to any other “cms” systems. Can’t even change the site logo through an admin menu for for christ’s sake.
Editing pages sucks out of the box too, infobox system is bonkers. Mediawiki needs tons of work but the frontend isn’t the problem.
There are hundreds of style for wikipedia on userstyles.org.
IMO, dozens are superior to this website in what they offer.
“It takes Wikipedia articles and modernizes to improve their readability by a mile.”
No it doesn’t. It makes it worse. There might be improvements, but the abominable giant header image is just a no go. Sure, it might look great, but isn’t wikipedia what you go to for information? So WikiWand is probably great for people who spend all their time on picture focused sites like pinterest, but for anyone else I can’t see how it is an improvement instead of several steps backwards.
As usual such an extension needs to access all your browser history and all websites you visit. Wasn’t it sufficient to know all wikipedia pages you visit?
Also as usual they sell your non personal data and give away your personal data “to affiliates that provide services to us with regards to our Website”
http://www.wikiwand.com/privacy
I hate Wikiwand. its fat,hard to read and helpful.
and worst of all there are no instructions on how to remove it.
FAIL!