ghacks Technology News

Chrome Gets Per-Site Permissions to Run Quicktime, Java Plugins

Big news today for the Google Chrome crowd. A post on the Google System blog outlines a recent change in the browser that affects the Java and Quicktime plugin, and maybe even other lesser known plugins. Probably the easiest way to demonstrate what has been changed is it show you a screenshot of Apple’s popular trailer website. As you may know, trailers on that site are working only if the Quicktime plugin is installed in the web browser.

If you visit a trailer like this one in Google Chrome you get a notification at the top of the browser. It reads: The QuickTime plug-in needs your permission to run. Options are to always run the plugin on the site, run the plugin this time, load a learn more page or close the notification.

plug-in needs your permission to run

A similar alert is shown when you open a website that requires Java to be installed on the system (The Java plug-in needs your permission to run).

java plug-in

The Silverlight plugin is on the other hand not affected by that change. The selection of Always run on this site enables the plugin for that site, so that the notification is not shown anymore if you open other pages or the very same page on that domain. Run this time on the other hand runs enables the plugin for this moment, but will display the very same notification if you reload the page or switch to another page of the domain that requires Java.

The concept is basically similar to that of the NoScript extension for Firefox, with the difference that NoScript does not allow or disallow plugins, but only scripts that utilize plugins.

The core reason for the change according to Google is to protect Chrome users from vulnerabilities discovered in plugins that the majority may not use at all. And since that majority seems to be indifferent or unaware of the risks, it was necessary to implement a safety mechanism to protect them.

Chrome users who are visiting websites regularly that require one of the plug-ins on the other hand need to enable the plugin for every website that they visit regularly. Depending on how many websites they visit that make use of those plugins, it may take quite some time to get everything up and running again.

There is no option or setting available to enable the plugin for all websites, which is a slap in the face of users who make sure their plugins are up to date.

The missing option to always enable the plugin is a serious issue for users who make use of those limited plugins.

What’s your take on the issue?

Related Articles:

Google Chrome Now Disables Outdated Plugins
Keep Your Chrome Plugins Up To Date with Plugin Updater
Why are Two Flash Player Plugins Running In Google Chrome?
Check and Remove Plugins in Firefox
Hide Additional Plugins are Required To Display Messages In Firefox

Enjoyed the article?: Then sign-up for our free newsletter or RSS feed to kick off your day with the latest technology news and tips, or share the article with your friends and contacts on Facebook, Twitter or Google+ using the icons below.



About the Author:Martin Brinkmann is a journalist from Germany who founded Ghacks Technology News Back in 2005. He is passionate about all things tech and knows the Internet and computers like the back of his hand. You can follow Martin on Facebook or Twitter.

Author: , Monday April 18, 2011 -
Tags:, , ,


Responses so far:

  1. DanTe says:

    Finally, Chrome is almost as safe as Firefox with NoScript. But with that Sandboxie software gHacks reviewed a while ago, one doesn’t need to worry as much with browsers anymore. As long as you don’t store your passwords in the browser, even Safari is safe with Sandboxie. Can you folks tell, I LOVE Sandboxie!!

    (No, I do not work for Sandboxie :)

  2. WebkitLaughableSecurity says:

    Chrome will never be safe as long as it uses inferior Webkit browser engine which is easily hacked, like taking candy from a baby..

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/safarimacbook-first-to-fall-at-pwn2own-2011/8358

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/charlie-miller-wins-pwn2own-again-with-iphone-4-exploit/8378

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/pwn2own-2011-blackberry-falls-to-webkit-browser-attack/8401

    • grendel11 says:

      Can it be that bad if no one is breaking it at Pwn2Own? Google tossed in an extra $20,000 to anyone who could hack it. No one even tried… http://browserland.com/google-chrome/pwn2own-chrome-is-the-most-secure-browser/?replytocom=4951

  3. David Hughes says:

    This is a load of shit! Means I won’t be using Chrome anymore, I won’t put up with constantly having to answer a permission question every time I load a website. Piss on you Chrome! You HAD something fairly good…..

    • Anonymous says:

      I totally agree. I love google chrome, and, am just getting used to using it. I love the passwords it keeps for me, and lots of other stuff. BUT, I am so blasted tired of clicking “allow”….I am considering changing. I don’t understand what changing involves, I don’t really understand computers that good. BUT, I will try!!

  4. Saro says:

    This is a serious problem that the chrome team overlooked. There should be a way to enable a plugin for all sites. Switiching to Safari until they do.

  5. Enrico65 says:

    ABSURD policy, to put it bluntly.
    It is simply incredible that I have to authorize Java on EVERY new site that I visit and that there is no way to permanently disable this warning!
    If they don’t fix it, I’ll move to other browsers.

  6. Bob J. says:

    I think this is a great move. I hate it when a site loads some annoying video or some crap when all I want is to get at the information.

    And to all the whiners: is it really that hard to click a button ONCE per SITE? it only takes a fraction of a second…talk about laziness.

  7. Enrico65 says:

    Fortunately, I found a way to disable once and forever this sheer nonsense:
    “[Google Chrome folder]\chrome.exe” –always-authorize-plugins

    It was quite time.

    • Marc says:

      And just where do I copy and paste this to? The JavaScript?

      • Enrico65 says:

        Marc, this must be added to the end of the string that you use to launch Chrome (right click the Chrome icon -> “Shortcut”. tab -> “Target”).

        This is what you should put there:

        “C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe” –disk-cache-size=1000 –allow-outdated-plugins

        As you can see, from the time of my first post, the text changed.

    • DC Clark says:

      This does not always work. I have been doing this for a long time and some days it works but most not

    • DC Clark says:

      This is another one that doesnt always work

  8. wang says:

    My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find almost all of your post’s to be exactly I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content available for you? I wouldn’t mind writing a post or elaborating on some of the subjects you write related to here. Again, awesome blog!

  9. wenwens says:

    I added your weblog to bookmarks. And i’ll read your articles much more often! Before this, it would be possible for the government to arrest you just based on whatever you were saying, if they didnt like it.

  10. No Towel Head says:

    See Google? You keep hiring towel heads and chinks who mess up everything they touch.

Leave a Reply   Follow Ghacks   Subscribe To Comment Rss

Subscribe without commenting

© 2005-2012 Ghacks.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy - About Us