Should you Try Virtual or Dedicated Hosting?
Some businesses host their own web site on their own server (or servers) while other businesses hire a web hosting provider or buy hosting services through an Internet service provider. Once you know the differences between virtual and dedicated web hosting, you will have an easier time evaluating cost, risk, and flexibility in order to decide which type of hosting is right for you.
You can think of web hosting as being divided into two types: virtual web hosting and dedicated web hosting. Virtual web hosting is often favored by small businesses because of its cost effectiveness. With virtual web hosting, you rent space alongside many other businesses on a server. While it sounds as if all the businesses are jumbled up on one piece of hardware, what is actually the case is that each client in a virtual web hosting environment has its own server resources blocked off from everybody elseâ€™s, including processor, memory, and disk space. This works well for businesses that donâ€™t need a lot of disk space or bandwidth to operate their web site. It is also a great choice for clients who want to manage a number of separate web sites at a low cost.
The reason that this type of web hosting is so cost effective is that despite their unique functions, the web hosting requirements are very similar among small businesses. Hosting vendors who can offer nearly identical services to a large number of customers efficiently are able to multiply small profits by large numbers of customers.
Dedicated hosting is an option that midsize and large businesses may consider if they need the control and flexibility of having a server (or servers) dedicated to their website. This type of web hosting is expensive, but allows greater control over security, support, and maintenance. Web hosting vendors who offer dedicated hosting have redundant resources in their data center that can nearly eliminate downtime.
Dedicated hosting often means that your business can write and run custom scripts and applications, or just manage the web site and leave the upkeep of the network and hardware to the hosting company. You can buy a server and host the site yourself, but this is an expensive option and means you have to either know how to manage the hardware, software, and connectivity or you have to hire someone who does. Some businesses already have a dedicated IT staff and data center, and if this is the case, then it probably makes sense to buy and operate another server.
However, for companies without their own IT department and budget, renting a dedicated server from a hosting provider is the most cost effective option. There are many web hosting vendors who offer dedicated server packages. Once you know how much of a hands-on approach youâ€™re willing to take, you can examine the offerings of several hosting vendors and see if their operations complement yours. Some vendors provide tools for creating and managing your site by providing a web based control panel that you can use to tweak your site. Some vendors let you use your own HTML authoring program and upload pages as you make them.
Web hosting vendors know they have to compete for your business, and most try to make your choice easy by offering services that are popular and packaging them together into specific web hosting plans. Most of the plans out there have you pay an upfront set-up fee, and then a monthly fee for your plan and any additional a la carte options (like extra storage or extra email accounts) you purchase.
There are so many web hosting vendors around that it can be overwhelming for a business to choose who they want to host their website. If you know your requirements, or can broadly estimate them, you can almost certainly find a web hosting vendor with a hosting package that is right for you and allows for your site to grow along with your business.
I vote for dedicated with RAID, for developers VPS can be great answer
There are actually three types of hosting, and your article kind of blurs them into two.
First, there is shared hosting. Shared hosting has each clients’ (client is the person purchasing shared hosting) sites “jailed” into their own hosting environment. This environment can’t affect the software configuration of other clients, but it shares the CPU and memory resources with the all of other clients hosting on that server. This is the cheapest option
Second, there is virtual hosting. Virtual hosting takes a large, high-end physical server (host server) and splits it into multiple virtual private servers. Each virtual private server(VPS) has its own CPU allocation, memory allocation, and disk space in its own environment. No VPS (if the hosting company has allocated correctly) can impact any other VPS on the host server. You pay by the CPU and memory allocation, typically. Disk space isn’t that expensive. An example of this type of hosting is http://www.slicehost.com and no, I’m not affiliated in any way.
Third, there is the dedicated server, which as it sounds is a complete physical server with all resources dedicated to the client.
VPS and dedicated hosting typically both require the client to have good knowledge of how a web server is configured, run and diagnosed(in the event of a problem). Most VPS and dedicated hosting packages include the nuclear option of a reset to defaults switch that resets the server to the way it was originally.
That was an excellent post with some great information. We published some information on this topic too.
VPSâ€™s are a wicked platform for low to mid load servers. with the different platforms they can run on, I would suggest virtuozzo as the recent developments with HyperVM render it exploitable