WinPrivacy review: new program of WinPatrol maker - gHacks Tech News

WinPrivacy review: new program of WinPatrol maker

WinPrivacy is a new program by the maker of the popular WinPatrol application that has been released as a beta version today.

The program, just like WinPatrol, is not free but commercial. It has been designed to improve user privacy on the Internet in numerous ways.

While you could assume that it is a CCleaner type of application, it is in fact complementary to the program as it concentrates on other privacy related issues.

WinPrivacy runs in the background as a service while you are using the computer. It monitors the system and informs you about the following in its dashboard:

  1. Which programs connect to the Internet.
  2. Which domains that you have accessed have used fingerprinting.
  3. Third-party Flash cookies that got saved to your system (not in Beta yet).

Those are the three core features currently. It goes beyond notifications though which you will notice once you click your way through the interface.


The program displays core information in a dashboard on start which highlight allowed and blocked connections and programs, as well as how many sites you encountered that used Canvas Fingerprinting.

Internet programs

winprivacy connections

The software lists all programs that have created connections to the Internet while it was running in the background.

It lists the program's name and path, the number of connections of the session and the total number of connections, and time and date of the last and initial connection.

A history is provided which you can access to see detailed information about each connection that include the remote IP and port, bytes in and out, and time and date.


You can block any application from accessing the Internet with two clicks. This blocks all Internet traffic of the selected program.

All blocked programs are listed by WinPrivacy so that you can unblock them at any given time.

There is also an option in the program settings to block new programs that try to connect to the Internet automatically from doing so.

A notification is displayed when programs get blocked so that you know that this happened. You can then visit the blocked programs listing in WinPrivacy to unblock them if the need arises.


WinPrivacy detects Canvas Fingerprinting attempts and notifies you about them. This works similar to how Internet connections of programs are noticed.

The software lists all clean domains and those that use Canvas Fingerprinting in its interface with options to block fingerprinting attempts automatically in the settings.

It is furthermore possible to block all communication with domains that use fingerprinting.

This feature did not work correctly during tests. I ran the HTML5 Canvas Fingerprinting test on BrowserLeaks and WinPrivacy did not notify me about it or block the test from being run.

Flash Cookies

The third major feature of the application. It is currently not integrated in the beta. It enables you to clear Flash cookies on the system using WinPrivacy.

It appears that there won't be options to block the creation of these cookies in first place though.


WinPrivacy is in no way as comprehensive as WinPatrol but that is understandable considering that the latter has been in development for a long time.

The feature to block Internet connections from new programs automatically is helpful, as is the blocking of Canvas Fingerprinting or options to delete Flash Cookies.

I can see this program grow over time to become a privacy powerhouse but for now it is lacking features that I would like to see in it including options to manage cookies, support for blocklists and options to look up additional information about visited domains.


software image
Author Rating
5 based on 1 votes
Software Name
Operating System
Landing Page

  • We need your help

    Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.

    We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats (video ads) or subscription fees.

    If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:


    1. G456 said on December 22, 2014 at 10:41 am

      Compare the logo displayed on the screenshots above with that displayed on the ones uploaded on WinPrivacy’s official website.

      1. Martin Brinkmann said on December 22, 2014 at 11:07 am

        This is likely the case because I reduced the size of the interface.

    2. Dwight Stegall said on December 22, 2014 at 2:56 pm

      I don’t believe they can really block all of the browser fingerprinting. There is just too much data in your browser and too many sneaky ways too mine it all. Run WinPrivacy then run these fingerprinting tests.

      1. Martin Brinkmann said on December 22, 2014 at 3:15 pm

        It is focusing on Canvas Fingerprinting currently.

      2. enchilada said on December 22, 2014 at 8:40 pm

        I agree. Unless a watchdog provides a component which is installed as a browser extension, it cannot “see” when a canvas-related scripted operation has occurred. If such does occur, when the data gleaned via canvas fingerprinting (or other mechanism) is transmitted via TLS/https… watchdog would need to be an SSL-enabled MITM in order to inspect the details of the traffic.

        I wonder: as websockets (ws:// and wss://) usage becomes increasingly common, how will watchdogs cope with attempting to monitor those “connections”? They won’t necessarily exhibit connections to just remote posts 80/443. Similarly, I wonder how watchdogs will (necessarily) evolve, to cope with the changing nature of connections. With SPDY increasingly in the mix, isn’t a watchdog relegated to monitoring/counting in terms of “sessions” rather than “connections”?

        The bar graphs on the “dashboard” are lame, and the inch-tall logo emblazoned across the UI screams (to me) “glitz, glitz, glitz — we’re selling the sizzle, not the steak”.

    3. Purplemaizenjm said on December 23, 2014 at 9:31 pm

      What happen to “Do Not Track Me” and all the other crap that people dont want paper and cookie trails. At the end of each time I make sure my history, cache, cookies, etc on all browsers and computers are wiped clean. I even clean out the harddrives hidden cache.

    4. GovZ said on July 2, 2015 at 4:25 am

      Hello Martin, Everyone,

      I hope all is well on everyone’s end.
      I am an engineer for both WinPatrol and WinPrivacy.
      I work alongside Bret in developing both products.

      I was looking for some useful notes about winprivacy and found your review.
      Thank you very much for taking time to review us.
      Purplemaizenjm has a really great feature at hand here. And I’m taking notes.
      We will surely add it in our backlog.

      Please check out the latest version of WinPrivacy and Winpatrol.
      We have updated as much as we can on both the server side and the product side.

      Thank you so very much for supporting our products.
      We hope you continue to support small companies like ourselves.

      Thank you

    Leave a Reply