IPVanish vs. NordVPN Comparison: which VPN provider is better?
IPVanish and NordVPN are two virtual private network (VPN) service providers, which we have reviewed here on this site recently. This comparison of the two providers may assist Internet users in selecting the right provider for their use cases. You may be astonished that the products differ in a lot of areas, including price, features and also privacy.
Here is what the comparison covers:
- Jurisdiction and privacy -- do the providers keep their privacy promises, e.g. that nothing is logged?
- Application and protocol support -- which apps are provided and which VPN protocols are supported?
- Features -- which VPN provider offers the better features?
- Media Streaming -- how good is the streaming support, e.g. can customers watch Netflix, Disney+ or Amazon Prime?
- Speed tests -- how good are the servers?
- Support -- which company has the best support options?
- Price -- which of the two providers offers the best value?
IPVanish vs. NordVPN at a glance
|Servers||More than 1900 servers in 75 locations||More than 5181 in 60 countries|
|Performance||Very Good||Very Good|
|Support||Email, chat support||Email, chat support|
|Privacy||No IP leaks|
No DNS leaks
|No IP leaks
No DNS leaks
|Price||$10.99 per month|
$4 per month for the first 2 years.
$89.99 for each consecutive year
|$11.95 per month
$4.92 for 12 months ($59 per year)
$3.30 per month for 24 months ($89 per year) plus 3 extra months
IPVanish vs. NordVPN jurisdiction
NordVPN is headquartered in Panama, which is not a member of the 14-Eyes countries.
IPVanish is headquartered in the United States. The company was acquired by J2 Global, which in the meantime split into the company's Ziff Davis and Consensus. Ziff Davis owns other VPN companies and file storing services, such as StrongVPN, Encrypt.me and Sugarsync, and also own popular media sources such as PCMag and Mashable, shopping and coupon site RetailMeNot, and finally gaming sites Humble Bundle and IGN, just to name some popular brands.
Panama is not a 14-eyes country. The United States is.
Server Comparison between NordVPN and IPVanish
NordVPN operates 5181 VPN servers in 60 countries. IPVanish operates more than 1900 servers in 75 locations. NordVPN's server fleet twice as large as the server fleet of IPVanish.
Most IPVanish servers are located in North America and Europe (almost 1800 servers). The provider operates 83 servers in Asia, 31 servers in South America, 11 in Africa, and 73 in Oceania. NordVPN does not list exact server numbers by region, but the company does operate servers on all continents as well.
IPVanish does not operate special servers, e.g. for streaming servers, P2P or obfuscation. NordVPN does offer some, including special servers for P2P and so-called Double-VPN servers which tunnel traffic through two VPN servers in different countries. NordVPN operates Onion over VPN servers, and supports obfuscated servers, which are designed for users from countries with high restrictions on the use of VPNs.
NordVPN controls its servers, which are co-hosted and run using RAM disks. It is unclear if IPVanish servers are rented, but it seems likely that this is the case.
VPN Apps supports
Both providers maintain applications for all major desktop and mobile operating systems. Clients are provider for the desktop operating systems Windows, Linux and Mac, and for the mobile operating systems Android and iOS. Instructions on setting up routers or connections manually are also provided on the websites.
The desktop applications enable customers to connect to a server quickly, or to select specific server locations. Both services display all supported protocols and extra options in the preferences. WireGuard is the default protocol but options are available to use a different protocol, which may be useful if WireGuard is not working properly.
The IPVanish client displays several security features in its interface under connection. You may enable the Kill Switch feature there, and enable the blocking of LAN traffic when the VPN disconnnects. Leak protections are enabled by default, as is the blocking of local network interfaces when connected to the VPN.
NordVPN lists several options that IPVanish does not support. Besides its content and malware blocking feature CyberSec, it is also supporting split tunneling, which enables customers to specify apps that should/should not use the VPN connection while connected to the VPN. Some apps, programs or sites may not work properly with VPNs.
IPVanish offers unlimited connections, while NordVPN restricts connections to 6 devices at the same time.
Winner: NordVPN's clients offer more features. Support for systems is equally good.
Encryption and Security: IPVanish vs NordVPN
IPVanish encrypts VPN traffic with an AES-256 cipher, 2048-bit key exchange and SHA-1 authentication. The service supports the protocols WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, L2TP and PPTP. The latter is considered insecure.
IPVanish does not reveal much about the technology that it uses for its server network. It describes the network as a Tier 1 network, but does not go into details. It is likely that servers are rented, and not operated by the company.
NordVPN encrypts traffic with an AES-256 cipher, a 4096 key exchange, and SHA256 authentication. These are stronger standards than those used by IPVanish. The company supports the protocols WireGuard (using its own implementation NordLynx), OpenVPN, IKEv2, and L2TP.
NordVPN is more open when it comes to its server network and the technology that it uses. Servers are run in RAM mode, which means that hard drives are not used and that there is no logging on the server. Additionally, NordVPN controls its server network using colocated servers that it owns. The claims have undergone an audit, which verified them.
IPVanish vs NordVPN logging
NordVPN's no-logging claim was verified by a third-party audit. IPVanish claims to be a no-logging provider as well, but the claim has not been verified by a third-party audit. Additionally, as Mike mentioned in his review, IPVanish had an incident in 2016, which caused doubt on the company's no-logging claim.
The previous owner of the company complied with a Department of Homeland Security request to provide information about a user, providing "numerous details that a company who claims not to log traffic would not have been able to provide". Nothing of this sort happened thereafter, but no third-party audit has confirmed the company's claims.
Streaming and P2P: IPVanish vs. NordVPN
Both providers support P2P traffic, but NordVPN operates special P2P servers that are optimized for the traffic. As far as streaming services support is concerned, both are not perfect. NordVPN supported more regional services during tests, e.g. more Netflix regions, and also other providers that IPVanish did not support at all, or not too well.
Mike's experience was not great:
Netflix and Amazon Prime were tested, and neither did very well. First, using a few Canadian IP addresses, both services detected the VPN. The same was when I started switching to American locations; I tried 10 different ones, two per state, and only one state and one server allowed me to access Netflix (I will not name the state or server however). So it should be noted that while the VPN has many many servers available, this could be a doubled edged sword; you may have to spend a long amount of time trying various servers out to get unblocked access to the streaming services that you want.
My NordVPN experience was better, but not perfect. Most servers worked to access services such as Netflix, BBC or Amazon Prime, but some were blocked, and some regional services could not be accessed at all. Mileage may depend on the server, as some may be blocked by streaming services.
IPVanish vs. NordVPN features
IPVanish offers the following features:
- Killswitch -- to block Internet connectivity if the VPN connection drops; this is a security precaution to avoid that the device's IP address leaks while the VPN connection is not available.
- OpenVPN Scrambling -- Deep-Packet Inspection is possible by ISP's and other agencies using advanced technologies; OpenVPN protocol with scrambling helps to protect against this and ensure privacy, including things such as the Great Firewall of China.
NordVPN has the following features:
- CyberSec – protects against known malicious sites and advertising by blocking these outright when enabled.
- Killswitch – blocks Internet traffic if the VPN connection drops. May also be used to terminate apps that you specify when the VPN connection is no longer available.
- Split Tunneling – Use some apps with a VPN connection and others without. Ideal for apps and services that block you if you are connected to a VPN.
- P2P servers – special servers optimized for torrent traffic.
- Obfuscated servers – designed to access the VPN service in countries that make VPN use difficult, e.g. China.
- Double-VPN servers – option to chain the connection so that it is routed through two VPN servers instead of just one.
- Tor-over-VPN – option to access Tor .onion sites using the VPN.
IPVanish's feature set is basic. The provider supports the WireGuard protocol, which is good. KillSwitch support is a must in these days, but many other providers, including NordVPN or Private Internet Access, have more to offer feature-wise.
NordVPN supports WireGuard as well, and it operates specialty servers for P2P or better protection online. Both providers lack specialized streaming servers though.
Both providers support leak protections and kill switches. NordVPN includes an application kill switch next to that, which terminates selected applications if the VPN connection is terminated.
IPVanish vs. NordVPN performance
IPVanish and NordVPN offered a good performance during tests. Mike, who reviewed IPVanish for the site, noted that IPVanish offered "very impressive speeds and very acceptable pings" when compared to the Internet connections raw performance. NordVPN offers excellent speeds and pings as well.
Connection performance depends on a lot of factors, including the user's Internet connection but also the selected VPN server. Mileage may vary, and it is a good idea to test performance by signing-up for a trial offer. All in all, both providers offered good performance values for the tested server connections.
IPVanish vs. NordVPN price comparison
IPVanish offers several different pricing options. A one month subscription is available for $10.99. Users who subscribe for a year or two pay $4 per month for the period. Afterwards, the price goes up to $89.99 per year, which comes down to 7.49 per month.
NordVPN's monthly price is higher, at $11.95. The 12 month subscription price is $4.92, and the 24 months subscription price is $3.30. The latter gets users 3 extra months on top. Pricing does not change after the periods.
IPVanish users may pay a bit extra ($0.89) to get 500 Gigabytes of secure cloud storage added to their account.
Most providers offer discounts every now and then. It is usually a good idea to wait until discounts become available to subscribe to one of the providers. The next discounts may be available during this year's Black Friday event.
Winner: NordVPN for the long run
Conclusion of our IPVanish vs. NordVPN comparison
NordVPN is the winner of the comparison. It offers more servers, better security and privacy, and is also better price-wise if you subscribe for two years. Additionally, NordVPN's claims and server network has been audited by an independent organization, which verified the company's claims.
Streaming support could be a bit better, especially when you compare it to CyberGhost, which operates servers for special streaming services.
IPVanish lacks many of the features of top of the class VPN providers. The service may still be an option for users, for instance when you can subscribe to it as a student or professor, as the price drops to $3.20 then. If you want to go online with a lot of devices at the same time, lot meaning more than six, then it is IPVanish that makes that possible.
Ghacks strives to be a trusted and unbiased website. In some specific cases, we may earn an affiliate commission or write a sponsored article, but an explicit disclaimer will always tell our readers when an advertiser or an affiliate partner is supporting one of our articles. If no disclaimer, it means that we work with total editorial independence.
Nobody beats Mullvad. Period
Except ProtonVPN ;)
You mean TesonetVPN? Don’t think so.
No, I indeed mean Swiss-based ProtonVPN. :)
I indeed meant them as well. I said what I said.
Adguard VPN best.
NordVPN has a long history of not being trust-wordy. Some leaks (hacks) NordVPN left for many years and upto today I am still wondering of there safe.
You still cant avoid an IPv6 Leak with NordVPN. Split tunneling is stil not realized.
A there are very strong rumors that NordVPN is not based in Panama.
NordVPN is boosting that there building new servers in Finland. When those Finnish servers are realized I am will research NordVPN again.
They only positive thing I can say about NordVPN is that NordVPN got its logs policy audited back in 2018 and again in 2020 by PWC.
I will not even consider to buy NordVPN before there based in Finland and there having a few more years under there beld, without new big scandals.
But they really question is why consider even NordVPN when there are cheaper and better VPN services, than NordVPN.
NordVPN is owned by Tesonet. ProtonVPN is also strongly associated with (or rather, highly likely owned by) Tesonet.
Tesonet has set up these honeypots very well. NordVPN is legally an entity in Panama (because in Panama the owner of a company does not have to be published – hehe), but they are actually operated from Lithuania. That they are legally a company in Panama means that they don’t HAVE TO log, but they are totally allowed to do it, if they want to. You can bet that Tesonet is logging seeing how it’s a data mining company. PWC conducted an audit, but as with any other VPN audit, they didn’t look at the entire network but rather only at select servers shown to them by Tesonet – their conclusions are irrelevant unless they were offered access to the entire network.
Thanks for the extra info Iron heart.
I will look into that.
I am already reading about the lawsuit which names NordVPN, Tesonet in a proxy data extraction scheme meta-thread.
A when i type in Tesonet and words like lawsuit, scandal, etc I have years of reading ahead of me.
The latest Windows client for NordVPN does now have a split tunneling feature and I can confirm it works. Also, they do have servers in Finland and I’ve tested that they work as well. As for claims of Nord’s ‘untrustworthiness’, it seems like there has been a lot of FUD that’s been spread around over the years. Telling FUD from Fact seems a difficult task at times. I’m open to hearing further information, though. ;-)
Tor Browser is gratis, more trustless, and not managed by shady companies like the typical VPN.
It was created by the US military and later funded by the CIA with, as claimed by the project itself, the purpose among other things to protect the safety of US military occupation forces in hostile countries and of undercover police agents when they infiltrate leftist or unwanted criminal organizations. So you can rest assured that only the US government and its allies will spy on you when using it.
Again, advertising is a comparison of a pair of services from one owner. :(
What’s the best Lowbox deal to use for creating one’s own VPN server?
If you ask me I prefer using Ivacy, and particularly their USA VPN (https://www.ivacy.com/vpn-servers/usa-vpn/). It has unthrottled speed and fast servers for superior experience.
What about expressvpn or maybe purevpn?