Windows EeePC 900 cheaper than Linux model - gHacks Tech News

Windows EeePC 900 cheaper than Linux model

Update: Bruno Miguel pointed out that the official Asus website for Australia lists different information. Both Windows and Linux EeePC 900 will have the same 20 Gigabyte storage capacity. The Windows model is listed with $799 Australian Dollars while the Linux edition with $649. The Linux edition would be $150 cheaper than the Windows edition of the Asus EeePC 900.

I already see signs of a public outcry in the Internet landscape. How can it be that a version for a free operating system, Linux, is more expensive than the version for Windows XP? If you know only these facts you might think that Microsoft is using its power to promote Windows on the EeePC 900 by either giving the version away for free or subsidizing it.

This may very well be a valid point but you have to know the following fact to come to a conclusion. The Windows version of the EeePC 900 will ship with a 12 Gigabyte Solid State Disk while the Linux version will have a 20 Gigabyte one. The price difference between the two versions is $50 Australian Dollars according to website apcmag.

So the reality is that Asus did cover the license cost of Windows and Works on the EeePC 900 by reducing the hard drive of that version. Which version will sell better when the EeePC 900 comes out?

I think it could be the Windows version. It's cheaper which is always a good selling point and it is Windows, something more users are used to work with. Casual users will have trouble finding out if 8 Gigabytes of additional hard drive space are worth the extra 50 bucks and the time it takes to feel comfortable working with a Linux system.

eeepc 900

A first short review was also included in the article:

The XP version of the Eee boots quite speedily for a Windows box, but is still notably slower than its Linux counterpart. Even Asus' press release promoting the product acknowledges that the Linux machine is faster to get started. "It provides a fast boot-up time, ideal for quick internet access while waiting for public transport or taking notes on-the-go," it breathlessly proclaims.

Apparently, "the Linux version is suited to users who desire an icon-driven and easy point-and-click interface – well suited for children or users with limited computer experience". We'll leave the reader to deduce what that implies about the XP interface.

Does this imply that the Windows XP version will be suitable to computer experts only? Every technology inclined user will obviously buy the Linux version and not the Windows one. Additional eight Gigabytes of space for $50 is well worth the extra cash.

Summary
Windows EeePC 900 cheaper than Linux model
Article Name
Windows EeePC 900 cheaper than Linux model
Description
How can it be that a version for a free operating system, Linux, is more expensive than the version for Windows XP?
Author
Publisher
Ghacks Technology News
Logo




  • We need your help

    Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.

    We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats (video ads) or subscription fees.

    If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:

    Comments

    1. Bruno Miguel said on May 9, 2008 at 11:27 pm
      Reply

      Actually, that’s not true, as you will see in Asus website: http://www.asusnotebook.com.au/eee-pc.php
      And even if the info wasn’t in Asus website, you can’t compare an inferior laptop with Windows with one with better specs like the GNU/Linux one.

      Please, correct your incorrect information.

    2. Bob said on May 10, 2008 at 1:38 am
      Reply

      I’d just like to point out that the linked site is not the official Asus site. It is run by on-line retailer PCMarket.

    3. Bruno Miguel said on May 10, 2008 at 2:05 am
      Reply

      You corrected (only the title, wich is misleading, missing). I congratulate you for that. Most people wouldn’t have corrected the unintentional error.

    4. yash said on May 10, 2008 at 5:17 am
      Reply

      typo end of 4th para. : trouble not troubles{martin that’s 2 times in 2 days! :) }

    5. kennfd said on June 9, 2008 at 12:26 am
      Reply

      >The Windows model is listed with $799 Australian >Dollars while the Linux edition with $649.

      The article and the headline do not match. How is $649 for Linux more than $799 for Windows?

    6. Martin said on June 9, 2008 at 9:16 am
      Reply

      Because the article was updated but the title cannot be changed

    Leave a Reply