How to watch Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 of NBA Playoffs 2023 from anywhere in the world

Onur Demirkol
May 12, 2023
Updated • May 12, 2023

The Warriors vs. Lakers matchup in the Western Conference is one of the most exciting matchups of this year's NBA Playoffs 2023 action. Despite having the advantage after the fourth game, Los Angeles Lakers failed to finish the job and gave the Warriors another chance. Today's game is very important for both sides, and if you are an NBA fan, you must watch it. Here is how to watch Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 of NBA Playoffs 2023 from anywhere in the world!

For Game 6, the series will return to Los Angeles. Golden State finished 11-30 on the road in the regular season and is 0-2 in this series at Arena, but as Curry demonstrated in Game 7 of the first round, the team is the defending NBA champion for a reason.

Protect your computer with NordVPN.

Detect malware during downloads and block trackers and intrusive ads. Stay safe online with the leading VPN service.
Try NordVPN today

The Lakers are very close to the Conference Finals

In Game 5, Anthony Davis took a hit in the face and had to leave the arena in a wheelchair due to a concussion. LeBron said that "the medical team said he’s doing better,” but he may miss the game.

On Monday, Game 4 seemed like Stephen Curry vs the world, and while he finished with a 31-point triple-double, he was not himself, hitting 3-of-14 from 3-point range and with little support. The Warriors won 121-106 in a must-win Game 5 at Chase Center on Wednesday night, trailing the series 3-1. Steph Curry led the Warriors with 27 points and eight assists, while Andrew Wiggins and Draymond Green all had 20-point games.

Curry has gone cold on 3-pointers, which is unusual for a guy who sometimes goes full halves without missing. Curry is currently 6-for-25 in his past two games and shooting 35.8% on 3-pointers for the series and 37.1% overall in the 2023 playoffs after another lackluster performance (3-for-11) on Wednesday. Both figures are below average for him, as he has never shot less than 37.7% on 3-pointers in any playoffs (2018-19).

When is the Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 of the NBA Playoffs 2023?

The Warriors vs. LAkers Game 6 is on Friday, May 12, at 10:00 p.m. ET. As both teams are on the western side of the country and there are NBA fans all around the world waiting for this game, we have also listed a couple more starting times for different time zones. Check them out below:

  • Los Angeles: 7:00 p.m.
  • Mexico City: 8:00 p.m.
  • London: 3:00 a.m. (May 13)
  • Madrid: 4:00 a.m (May 13)
  • New Delhi: 7:30 a.m. (May 13)
  • Tokyo: 11:00 a.m. (May 13)
  • Sydney: 12:00 a.m. (May 13)

How to watch Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 of NBA Playoffs 2023?

The Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 will be aired live on ESPN. You can open the channel on your TV either before the game to watch the pre-game show or at the starting time mentioned above. Remember that the shows will continue after the game, and you will have the option of listening to some of the biggest NBA legends commenting on the game.

A second method is to watch the Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 live stream. ESPN has its own service named "ESPN+," and if you are subscribed to it, you can watch the game, including the pre and post-game shows. Other live stream services that will air the game are fubo and Sling TV.

How to watch Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6

How to access Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 live stream?

You may face issues if you are trying to connect to these services outside of certain countries, including the United States. It doesn't mean that you won't be able to watch the Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 live stream, as VPNs will help you overcome any issues! Regardless of geographical restrictions, you may watch the game live using VPNs.

VPN services like NordVPN, ExpressVPN, and Surfshark may be used to bypass geographical restrictions and watch the game from anywhere in the world. NordVPN is currently offering a 63% discount and an additional three months if you subscribe to a year-long contract for just $88.83! You may also use other VPNs, such as ExpressVPN or Surfshark, to watch the Warriors vs. Lakers Game 6 live stream from anywhere in the world.

Warriors vs. Lakers NBA Playoffs 2023: Results and Schedule

Currently, the Lakers are leading the series 3-2, and the competition might either end today or the Warriors can also force another game to keep their hopes alive. If the Lakers win today, there won't be another game. You can find the whole results and schedule below:

Game 1: Warriors | 112 - 117 | Lakers

Game 2: Warriors | 127 - 100 | Lakers

Game 3: Lakers | 127 - 97 | Warriors

Game 4: Lakers | 104 - 101 | Warriors

Game 5:  Warriors | 121 - 106 | Lakers

Game 6: Warriors at Lakers, May 12, 10:00 p.m. ET.

Game 7*: Lakers at Warriors, May 15, 8:00 p.m. ET.


Disclaimer: Some of the links added in the article are part of affiliate campaigns and may represent benefits for gHacks.



Tutorials & Tips

Previous Post: «
Next Post: «


  1. Seeprime said on September 8, 2023 at 4:12 pm

    Missing from the “story”: Ukraine’s agreement to never use Starlink for military purposes. This is why.

    Ghacks quality is AI driven and very poor these days since AI is really artificial stupidity.

    1. Karl said on September 12, 2023 at 9:10 pm

      “Elon Musk biographer Walter Isaacson forced to ‘clarify’ book’s account of Starlink incident in Ukraine War

      “To clarify on the Starlink issue: the Ukrainians THOUGHT coverage was enabled all the way to Crimea, but it was not. They asked Musk to enable it for their drone sub attack on the Russian fleet. Musk did not enable it, because he thought, probably correctly, that would cause a major war.”

      1. Karl said on September 14, 2023 at 5:58 pm

        I posted above comment to:

        Not to the following article about Geforce where I currently also can see it published:

  2. Anonymous said on September 11, 2023 at 10:09 pm

    Well, using Brave, I can see Llama 2 being decent, but it is still not great?
    All these AI stuff seems more like a ‘toy’ than anything special, I mean, it is good for some stuff like translations or asking quick questions but not for asking anything important.

    The problem is Brave made it mostly for summarizing websites and all that, but all these Big tech controlled stuff, won’t summarize articles it doesn’t agree with, so it is also useless in many situations where you just want it to give you a quick summarization, and then it starts throwing you little ‘speeches’ about how it doesn’t agree with it and then it never summarizes anything, but give you all the 30 paragraphs reasons why the article is wrong, like if I am asking it what it thinks.

    SO all this AI is mostly a toy, but Facebook with all the power they have will be able to get so much data from people, it can ‘train’ or better say, write algorithms that will get better with time.

    But It is not intelligence, it is really not intelligence all these AI technology.

  3. Tom Hawack said on September 14, 2023 at 2:11 pm

    Article Title: Tech leaders meet to discuss regulation of AI
    Article URL: []

    The eternal problematic of regulating, here applied to AI. Should regulations (interventionism) have interfered in the course of mankind ever since Adam and Eve where would we be now? Should spirituality, morality, ethics never have interfered where would we be now? I truly have always believed that the only possible consensus between ethics and freedom is that of individuals’ own consciousness.

    Off-topic : Musk’s beard looks like a wound, AI-Human hand-shake is a quite nice pic :)

    1. Karl said on September 14, 2023 at 5:55 pm

      Haha, oh dear, Tom.
      I thought that the comments system issue where comments shows up under a totally different article was fixed. But seeing your comment here, the “error” is clearly still active. Hopefully it is sorted as soon as possible.

      1. Tom Hawack said on September 14, 2023 at 6:40 pm

        Article Title: Tech leaders meet to discuss regulation of AI
        Article URL: []

        Hi Karl :) Well, let’s remain positive and see the good sides : one’s comment appearing within different articles (the one it was written form and for, another unrelated one) brings ubiquity to that comment : say it once and it’s published twice, double your pleasure and double your fun (“with double-mint, double-mint gum” and old ad!). Let’s forget the complications and inherited misunderstandings it leads to. Not sure the fun is worth the complications though. Which is why, with a few others here, I include Article Title & URL with comment, to ease a bit the pain.

        This said, I’m trying to find a logic key which would explain the mic-mac. One thing is sure : comments appearing twice keep the same comment number.

        For instance my comment to which you replied just above is originally :


        It then got duplicated to :


        Same comment number, which let’s me imagine comments are defined by their number as before but now dissociated in a way from their full path : that’s where something is broken, as i see it.

        First amused me, then bothered, annoyed (I took some holidays to lower the pressure), then triggered curiosity.
        I’m putting our best detectives on the affair, stay tuned.

      2. Karl said on September 16, 2023 at 8:58 am

        Hehe, yes indeed, staying positive is what we should do. Good comes for those who wait, as the old saying goes. Hopefully true for this as well.

        Interesting that the comments number stays the same, I noted that one thing is added to the duplicated comment in the URL, an error code, the following: “error-code-0x0003”.

        Not useful for us, but hopefully for the developers (if there are any?), that perhaps will be able to sort this comments error out. Or our detectives, I hope they work hard on this as we speak ;).

        Cheers and have a great weekend!

      3. Karl said on September 16, 2023 at 9:18 am

        Whoops, my bad. I just now realized that the error I saw in your example URL (error-code-0x0003) was part of the linked article title and generated by Geforce! Oh dear! Why did I try to make it more confusing than it already is lol!

        Original comment:


      4. Tom Hawack said on September 16, 2023 at 9:20 am

        Article Title: Tech leaders meet to discuss regulation of AI
        Article URL: []

        @Karl, you write,

        “I noted that one thing is added to the duplicated comment in the URL, an error code, the following: “error-code-0x0003”.”

        I haven’t noticed that up to now but indeed brings an element to those who are actually trying to resolve the issue.
        I do hope that Softonic engineers are working on fixing this issue, which may be more complicated than we can imagine. Anything to do with databases can become a nightmare, especially when the database remains accessed while being repaired, so to say.

        P.S. My comment about remaining positive was, in this context, sarcastic. Your literal interpretation could mean you are, factually, more inclined to positiveness than I am myself : maybe a lesson of life for me :)

        Have a nice, happy, sunny weekend as well :)

      5. 💾 said on September 16, 2023 at 12:35 pm

        Correct: AI is certainly overhyped, it’s also advertised by some shady individuals. It’s can also be misused to write poor quality articles or fake your homework.

        16 September 2023, this website is still experiencing issues with posts erroneously appearing in the wrong threads. There are even duplicates of the exact same post ID within the same page in some places.

      6. 💾 said on September 16, 2023 at 8:41 pm

        Clerical error “[It] can also be misused …” you just can’t get the staff nowadays.

        Obviously [#comment-4573795] was originally posted within [/2023/09/14/artificial-intelligence-regulation-tech-leaders/]. However, it has appeared misplaced within several threads.

        Including the following:

  4. Anonymous said on September 14, 2023 at 3:39 pm

    “How much radiation is dangerous?
    Ionizing radiation, such as X-rays and gamma rays, is more energetic and potentially harmful. Exposure to doses greater than 1,000 millisieverts (mSv) in a short period can increase the risk of immediate health effects.
    Above about 100 mSv, the risk of long-term health effects, such as cancer, increases with the dose.”

    This ban is about NON-ionizing radiation limits, because there is too much radio wave power from the iphone. This has nothing to do with the much more dangerous ionizing radiations like X-rays, that are obviously not emitted at all by mobile phones. I invite you to correct your article.

  5. Anonymous said on September 17, 2023 at 5:03 pm

    “ makes history as the first official UFO website”

    I wonder if it’s just smelly crowdsourcing for the spotting of chinese balloons or whatever paranoia they’re trying to instigate, or if they are also intentionally trying to look stupid enough to look for alien spaceships, for whatever reason. Maybe trying to look cute, instead of among the worst butchers of history ?

  6. Anonymous said on September 17, 2023 at 9:12 pm

    “The tech titan’s defense”
    “Whether he provides a clear explanation or justifies his actions”
    “the moral compass”

    You take it for granted that this company should agree being a military communications provider on a war zone, and so directly so that his network would be used to control armed drones charged with explosives rushing to their targets.

    You don’t need to repeat here everything you read in the mainstream press without thinking twice about it. You’re not just pointing interestingly that his company is more involved in the war that one may think at first and that this power is worrying, you’re also declaring your own support for a side in an imperialist killfest, blaming him for not participating enough in the bloodshed.

    Now your article is unclear on how this company could be aware that its network is used for such military actions at a given time, which has implications of its own.

    Reading other sources on that quickly, it seems that the company was: explicitly asked ; to extend its network geographically ; for a military attack ; at a time when there was no war but with the purpose of triggering it, if I understood well. You have to be joking if you’re crying about that not happening at that time. But today you have your war, be happy.

  7. Anonymous said on September 30, 2023 at 1:21 am

    comments and article dont match

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

We love comments and welcome thoughtful and civilized discussion. Rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please stay on-topic.
Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.