The majority of computer users use weak passwords when they register for online services, create Windows accounts and other activities that require them to pick a password. The only situation where a stronger password is selected is when a service forces them to do so. Most Internet services do not, probably because of fear that many users leave the account creation screen when they run into password creation troubles (12+ characters, 1+ number and special char).
There are two main reasons why weak passwords are selected by a lot of Internet users. The first is because it is easier to remember and there does not seem to be an immanent danger in doing so. The service would request a stronger password if it would not be secure, right? And they surely know best. The second, because they can.
Attackers use a couple of methods to decrypt passwords. The two most common methods are brute forcing and dictionary attacks. In brute forcing, all possible password combinations are tested starting with aaa or whatever the minimum required password is up to about eight characters tops. Why eight? Because afterwards, it takes years to get results if you use a home setup to crack the passwords.
Ars Technica ran a story yesterday about a 25-gpu cluster that cracks every standard Windows password of eight characters or less, in less than six hours. The machine, designed specifically for brute forcing algorithms can attack 45 other algorithms at speeds that were previously not in the realm of possibility for home usage.
The security researcher who build the machine tested its predecessor against the leaked LinkedIn password database. The result? 90% of all 6.5 million passwords were cracked by it by using a combination of brute forcing and a 500 million strong word list. With the help of the new machine, the attack would have lasted only a quarter of the time. While the old machine's 15.5 billion guesses are remarkable, the new one's 63 billion against Sha1 (the LinkedIn algorithm) are raising the ante once more.
While remarkable, it needs to be noted that this only applies to offline attacks, where a password database or file has been retrieved and is available locally. The speed depends a lot on the algorithm used. MD5 for instance maxes out at 180G/s while slower hashes like bcrypt (05) at 71k/s.
Adding additional characters to your passwords raise the game significantly as well. While the machine is capable of brute forcing eight or less character passwords using fast algorithms used by many sites on today's Internet, it will run into a brick wall when doing so for longer passwords. Two additional characters will increase the processing time to years for instance.
It needs to be noted that attackers usually use a combination of dictionary attacks and brute forcing. A dictionary attack tests a list of words against the database which is why one should never select dictionary words, e.g. "password", "computer" or "princess", or a modified dictionary word, e.g. "password1", "Micro$oft" or "princ3ss" to protect their accounts.
The only feasible approach is using a password manager to create strong unique passwords every time you sign up for a service. You can use an offline password manager like KeePass for that or an online manager like LastPass. For Windows and other operating systems, I'd suggest to encrypt the hard drive with a program like DiskCryptor to protect the data on the drive against attacks.
Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.
We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.
If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.