Windows Explorer Alternative Snowbird - gHacks Tech News

Windows Explorer Alternative Snowbird

microsoft windowsSnowbird is a lightweight Windows Explorer alternative that offers its users some extended functionality. The portable software program is compatible with Windows XP and above and comes with a tiny size of 468 Kilobytes unpacked.

The interface of the computer program has been divided into three areas. The header area containing menus and the breadcrumb navigation, the left sidebar that contains a list of all local and network drives including their folders and the main area that displays the files and folders that are located in the current directory level.

Some might say that this does not sound exciting enough to give it a try. Snowbird comes with an advanced feature set that might entice some users to give it a try though.

windows explorer snowbird

The Windows Explorer alternative offers a search form right in the interface which can search for files, folders and even file contents. It is furthermore possible to navigate with mouse gestures which can speed up folder navigation quite a bit.

The overall speed of Snowbird is fast, faster than that of Windows Explorer especially when navigating in network shares and large local folders. There is however one aspect that is not well designed. The only way to copy or move files is to mark them, right-click and select the appropriate option from the menu. In other words: Drag and drop is not supported.

We need your help

Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.

We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.

If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:

Comments

  1. Rarst said on June 20, 2009 at 7:11 pm
    Reply

    Very impressive operation speed but startup feels really slow. It probably indexes directory tree ahead or something.

    As for network shares it failed to open password protected network disk. Explorer ask for password but Snowbird failed with error.

  2. libeco said on June 20, 2009 at 7:56 pm
    Reply

    Very fast it is and it also has a shortcut to create a new folder (Ctrl + N) which is a very good thing, however there’re some drawbacks:
    – like you mentioned, no drag and drop
    – I miss my windows explorer XP statusbar
    – no extra columns to display (I always ‘use last opened at’)
    – lack of options, although that can be explained by the fastness of the app
    – mouse gestures with the middle mouse button don’t work comfortly as mouse gestures with the right mouse button (try Maxthon 2)

    And I’m still looking for a windows explorer replacement which lets me have tags used in a convenient way.

    So I guess it’s trusty old Windows Explorer XP which wins for me again… too bad I still can’t find a better file manager…

  3. Rarst said on June 20, 2009 at 8:05 pm
    Reply

    @libeco

    If you like native Explorer try Q-Dir. It’s like few Explorer windows packed together and enhanced with additional nifty features.

  4. libeco said on June 20, 2009 at 10:21 pm
    Reply

    @ Rarst
    I’ve tried it before and threw it away again, didn’t really feel like an improvement. I’ve just installed it again, I’ll just give it a try again, see how I like it.

    I wish there was a filemanager though that had these features:
    – Interface like Windows Explorer XP
    – Tagging files and filtering
    – Dropstack like CubicExplorer
    – Shortcuts (at least for a new folder, but preferably create own shortcuts)
    –> And if all these features could be accomplished, I probably wouldn’t mind an app which is just a tad slower than Windows Explorer XP…

  5. Permana said on June 21, 2009 at 5:17 am
    Reply

    This tool is very useful for me. Very impresive speed and fits my needs.

  6. kev said on June 21, 2009 at 2:01 pm
    Reply

    While this looks good, I prefer the more feature packed explorer replacements.
    I used Qdir untill recently. I now use Freecommander – most of the features Q-dir had, plus the very useful built in folder compare/sync and built in folder size display (I still have the “foldersize” shell installed for windows explorer.)

    Although comming from an opera user, mouse gestures in my explorer program would be welcomed.

  7. Adrian said on June 21, 2009 at 5:00 pm
    Reply

    Libeco

    That’ll be xplorer2 lite (The “2” is squared). I use it instead of Win Explorer, and it’s working perfectly. Also, any add-on for Win Explorer can be installed on Xplorer2 lite. There is a paid version, but the free version is good enough. Martin, thanks for writing about SongBird, and Rarst, thanks for suggesting q-Dir, which is also quite good.

    Adrian

  8. libeco said on June 21, 2009 at 6:33 pm
    Reply

    @ Adrian
    I have also tried it before and it did resemble the Windows Explorer XP look and feel, but again there were thingds that I didn’t like. Sorry, I’m very picky, even with freeware… :-)

    I just installed it again and found these two thing:
    – I can’t remove the breadcrumb above my regular view. I’m sure people use it, but I don’t but I don’t know how to get rid of it.
    – No tag support.

    What would be really nice is an Adobe Bridge like approach of keywords, collections and smart collections.

    Brdige is a very nice program for pictures, but I’m afraid for everyday use for files it’s just too slow…

  9. po134 said on June 23, 2009 at 3:51 pm
    Reply

    does anyone know of a explorer replacement that display folder size (and works on vista+ ) ?

  10. David said on June 24, 2009 at 8:40 pm
    Reply

    I’m interested in a replacement for Windows Explorer, there are lots out there that look very interesting, but I use Winkey+E to open it and I don’t want to lose this. I haven’t found a way to change the program it links to – anyone know?

    1. Rick said on November 8, 2009 at 3:20 pm
      Reply

      @David: Did you ever find a way to change Win+E to open an explorer replacement?

      1. David said on November 8, 2009 at 5:08 pm
        Reply

        @Rick: I wish. I believe it is possible with AutoHotKey but it’s not something I’ve looked into as yet.

      2. Rick said on November 8, 2009 at 8:04 pm
        Reply

        @David:
        I have been trying dozens of Explorer replacements and one claimed to replace Explorer for Win-E but it didn’t work. There may be a registry setting that we could use. Others do replace Explorer easily for opening folders and shortcuts to folders.

        I’ve been thinking I’ll just find a small, lightweight, portable hotkey program and associate Win-W (W being right next to E and such)…or maybe there’s a hotkey program that can override Windows built-in hotkeys.

      3. Rick said on November 9, 2009 at 12:10 am
        Reply

        @David:
        UltraExplorer has it built-in (Tools -> Shell Extension -> Win-E Hook) but it didn’t work for me. That must have been the one I forgot to make specific notes about earlier. It would probably work better if I installed it instead of extracting its setup.exe file using 7zip….

        I ran Sysinternals Process Monitor to see what it’s doing when I enable Win-E Hook and it’s just running its own program, basically a hotkey watcher whose only job is to watch for Win-E.

  11. Naşul said on June 28, 2009 at 5:03 pm
    Reply

    I think that total commander is better ;)

  12. Chadabox125 said on June 30, 2009 at 11:52 am
    Reply

    This a good way to explore files even if it doesn’t have a lot features…
    Also that the speed is really fast than Windows Explorer itself…
    It’s fast because it doesn’t put so much features for itself to load…

    Recommendation: If you like speed and don’t want to wait for a file to be moved from one folder to another, try this out!!

    Other recommendations:
    Good speed and features [XYPlorer] (http://www.xyplorer.com/)
    Good features but not as fast as XYPlorer [FreeCommander] (http://www.freecommander.com)

  13. Rob said on July 6, 2009 at 2:19 pm
    Reply

    Sounds good, but drat… I’m a fan of drag and drop.

  14. Jan den Ouden said on November 29, 2009 at 11:20 pm
    Reply

    I like the speed of Snowbird, and don’t care about some missing options compared to Windows Explorer, but I do have 1 serious problem: I cannot see my Windows 2003 and 2008 server shares. Windows NT4 and Windows 2000 server shares are OK.
    My PC is Windows XP SP3, logged in on a Windows 2003 domain.

  15. dhaval said on May 21, 2010 at 9:18 am
    Reply

    I don’t agree that it is fast because it is not displaying few detail information, this is faster than DOS commands like “dir”, even if you perform it on network mapped drive.

    Any Idea how such performance can be achieved..?

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.