The industry fights some unnecessary battles

Martin Brinkmann
Oct 5, 2006
Updated • May 15, 2013
Music and Video

I watched the movie Crank last Saturday in a cinema near my hometown. It was a great movie but something that happened before the film really annoyed the hell out of me. Why the hell are they showing clips that it is illegal to record the movie with cams and that you will face jail time for it before the movie starts? How likely is it that someone who has the intention to record the movie is actually in there? How much more likely is it that many visitors who paid lots of money to watch the movie are pretty annoyed by this message?

And don't you think that people who watch the movie with the intention to record the movie do not care about this warning? I pay money to watch the movie, not to see some crap that makes no sense at all. Another example, a friend recently bought a movie on DVD of a major label - again clips that say how evil piracy is and that it is illegal to copy the movie. He actually bought the movie and has to watch this? You can't even forward to the next chapter.

What the industry currently is doing is to criminalize their customers. Can't they see that this has one major effect? Customers are getting annoyed by this. If I buy something I don't want to be reminded that piracy is evil - I want to use it directly and without being forced to watch annoying messages.

Let us head over to DRM and see what they do there to make the live of their customers as miserable as possible. I don't want to reheat the discussion about Sony's attempt to plant rootkits on their customers computer systems to prevent them from copying the music; and I don't want to talk about all those customers who get sued by the RIAA because an IP address was sharing music with another which they traced back to the user. We all heard about RIAA suing the dead for instance, does not look like a fool proof system to me.

Let's say you bought some tunes from Apples iTunes store, or another store that uses DRM. It works fine, you are able to burn the songs on CD. Some years later you decided to buy the now top notch player from Microsoft which does not support Apples format. What would you do? Buy all songs again and hope that this time the next player you buy will support the format of the new songs? Will you illegally remove the DRM so that you can listen to songs that you purchased?

Some decades ago live was easier, you had records, you had tapes and later on compact discs. Nowadays you have a variety of competing systems which are incompatible with each other and make the customers life a living hell. In former times you could purchase music and was sure that it would run on devices that came out later in time. Today you can't be sure about that.

Windows Vista has the ability to lock out users who missed to activate the system in 30 days. Microsoft plans to make the users life miserable instead, surf for one hour only, no email checking and other features will work after  the 30 day period. This may help their sales but this surely has another effect that they probably did not think about. Users will either migrate to systems that do not impose such power over the user or become very annoyed by this measures.

Will all of this stop the commercial pirates? No it won't. Commercial pirates have the tools to make copies of movies and music even though the industry adds DRM and other measures to them.

So, who will is affected by this? Right, you and I, regular customers. Let me quite a nice analogy:

What could have been said is that DRM is like a toaster that only toasts Pepperidge Farm bread. You’ll pay full price for both the toaster and the bread, but they’ll sick the FBI on you if you figure out a way to toast a Thomas’ brand english muffin in the thing.

Here is a short list of things that you can do to show the industry that we, the users, are in power..

  • don't use services that sell DRM infested files, use services without drm instead.
  • switch to an operating system where you have control, not the company who sells it
  • don't buy CD's in retail stores that are copy protected
  • let your congressman know what you want
  • let your friends and family know about this and convince them to join the cause

More? Other suggestions? Let me know. Oh, one last thing, support EFF, they are doing a tremendous job.


Tutorials & Tips

Previous Post: «
Next Post: «


  1. Anonymous said on August 1, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    Why not make use of the mplayer.conf?

  2. Mike J said on August 1, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    Huh, I have never even seen this “font cache” pane; videos play at once for me, using VLC & XP SP3.

    1. Martin said on August 1, 2010 at 3:39 pm

      Mike, in theory this should have only been displayed once to you, at the very first video that you played with VLC. The time this window is displayed depends largely on the number of fonts in your font directory.

      1. Mike J said on August 2, 2010 at 2:30 pm

        huh, I lucked out for a change?? Amazing!!
        Apparently VLC keeps this info through version updates, but I didn’t see this message after a fresh OS install about 8 weeks ago, & a new VLC.

  3. myo said on August 1, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    yes, yes, i have the same problem. sometimes, VLC crashes when it is playing .mov file.

  4. Kishore said on August 13, 2010 at 2:55 pm

    Buidling font Cache pop-up


    Open VLC player.

    On Menu Bar:


    (at bottom – left side)
    Show settings — ALL

    Open: Video
    Click: Subtitles/OSD (This is now highlited, not opened)
    Text rendering module – change this to “Dummy font renderer function”


    Re-open – done.
    Progam will no longer look outside self for fonts

    Source –

    1. Martin said on August 13, 2010 at 3:10 pm

      Great tip, thanks a lot Kishore.

  5. javier said on August 14, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    @Kishore, I’ll try your tips, but does this mean it will no longer show subtitles either?
    I do use subtitles, but the fontcache dialog box pops up (almost) everytime I play a file.

    Could this be related to the fonts I have installed? Or if I add/remove fonts to my system?

    I’ll try to do a fresh install also, if your tips does no work. I’ll post back here later…


  6. Kishore said on August 15, 2010 at 12:38 pm

    @ Javier, The trick i posted will show up subtitles too. If not,

  7. Kishore said on August 15, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    @ Javier, The trick i posted will show up subtitles too. If not,Dont worry, VLC is currently sorting out this issue and the next version will be out soon.

    No probs @ Martin !! Its my pleasure

  8. Ted said on October 22, 2010 at 3:57 am

    Try running LC with administrator privileges. That seemed to fix it for me

  9. Evan said on December 8, 2013 at 1:48 am

    I am using SMplayer 0.8.6 (64-bit) (Portable Edition) on Windows 7 x64. Even with the -nofontconfig parameter in place SMplayer still scans the fonts. Also, I have enabled normal subtitles and it is still scanning fonts before playing a video. Also, it does this every time the player opens a video after a system restart (only the fist video played).

  10. Mike Williams said on September 6, 2023 at 1:26 pm

    Does that mean that only instrumental versions of songs will be available for non-paying users?

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

We love comments and welcome thoughtful and civilized discussion. Rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please stay on-topic.
Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.