Here's a quick tour of DuckDuckGo for Mac
DuckDuckGo browser for Mac was released in beta about a week ago. I got an invite after opting into the waitlist, and tested the browser. Here are my first impressions of the app.
You need to have the DuckDuckGo app installed on your iPhone or Android mobile, and opt-in to test the Mac browser. It takes a few days for the invite to arrive, when it does, you will see a notification on your phone. Tap it, and it will display an invite code. Download the DuckDuckGo browser for Mac from the official website. Install the app, run it and paste the invite code in it. You cannot use the browser without an invitation code, it sort of acts as a license, to unlock the app.
DuckDuckGo for Mac first impressions
When you run it for the first time, DuckDuckGo for Mac offers to import your bookmarks and passwords from other "less private browsers". You may also import logins from a CSV file from other password managers. Next, the app prompts you to set it as the default browser for the OS.
Try visiting a web page, and DuckDuckGo for Mac will display a message requesting your permission to manage cookie consent pop-ups. Enabling this option allows the browser to minimize the cookies from the site, to protect your privacy. All of these settings are optional.
The settings page in DuckDuckGo is pretty bare bones. It has two themes: Light and Dark, that you can choose between, or you may set it to follow the system's theme automatically. The browser can display the full website address in the URL bar, instead of just the name.
Note: The Dark theme made some elements on reddit unreadable for me, YMMV.
Sadly, the ad blocker is the biggest let down in the browser. DuckDuckGo for Mac blocks ads on websites, but does not hide the area where the banners appear, which makes web pages look weird.
It fails to prevent ads in other search engines, take a look at this example search on Google.
The browser does not block YouTube ads, so video ads are played and banners and pop-up banners that are shown during the stream, are not hidden automatically.
The app is still in early beta, so hopefully this is one area where it can improve.
DuckDuckGo has a built-in tracker blocker which protects your privacy by blocking the web requests before they are loaded. It uses Global Privacy Control (GPC) to prevent websites from sharing your personal data with trackers.
Click on the shield icon to the left edge of the address bar, to view the Tracker Protection for the current website. It displays some information about the site, lists the trackers that were found and blocked. Toggle the switch at the top of the panel to disable the protection for the website.
Fire button and Fireproof sites
If you have used the DuckDuckGo app on your phone, you will probably be aware of what the Fire button does. It clears all your browsing data in one go. You can whitelist sites to prevent being logged out of your account, by using the Fireproof option from the browser's menu or the tab bar context menu.
Manage the Fireproof Sites from the Privacy Section, it also has a toggle for disabling Cookie Consent Pop-ups. The Fire button lets you choose whether it should delete all data, or only the data for the current tab or window.
New Tab Page
Click the + button to open a new tab. It lists your favorite bookmarks, and displays a summary of the tracking attempts blocked on web pages that you opened. The sites are listed in reverse chronological order.
A customizable new tab page with a speed-dial, custom background would have been better, but that is a personal choice.
Click and drag tabs to rearrange their order, middle-click closes the tab. The tab bar's right-click menu does not have options to pin a tab or sort tabs by website or title.
The context menu has shortcuts to fireproof the page, close the tab, close tabs to the right, close other tabs, or move the tab to a new window. The DuckDuckGo browser for macOS does not support tab grouping, or lets you reopen closed tabs.
The browser's address bar lacks a Paste to go option. The context-menu in DuckDuckGo for Mac is quite similar to Safari, which is not surprising considering it is based on the WebKit rendering engine. But if you're coming to the app from Firefox, Chrome, etc., you'll definitely notice the lack of options in the menu. DuckDuckGo for Mac does not have a private browsing mode. There is no reader view for distraction-free reading, and no dark mode for web pages either.
The browser's bookmark manager is acceptable, you can't add new bookmarks to a folder directly. You'll have to bookmark a page, then access the management panel, and drag it to a folder you created. You can add webpages to your favorites by clicking the bookmark button, and then on the star button.
Password Management and Autofill
DuckDuckGo for Mac has a built-in password manager, that you can use to store your logins, credit card info, and addresses securely. The data is stored on your computer, and protected by your Mac's password, which you will need to input to unlock the vault.
As I mentioned earlier, the app can import your passwords from Apple Safari, Firefox, Chrome, LastPass, 1Password, etc. The browser will ask to save the username and password, addresses, and payment methods when you enter them on websites. You may add logins manually by accessing the Autofill panel from the app's menu.
When you visit a login page, click the key icon in the input field and the browser will autofill the username and password for you. The autofill option locks when the computer is idle for 15 minutes, though you can customize the timer.
The browser does not support password sync or bookmark sync across devices yet.
DuckDuckGo for Mac does not support extensions, but the company says it is investigating the possibility of adding support for add-ons. Given the limitations in Apple Safari's API, I'm not entirely sure what to expect. While I won't hold my breath for uBlock Origin, hopefully we can get to use the AdGuard for Safari extension.
Overall, DuckDuckGo for Mac seems like a decent browser for a product that's in beta. While the privacy-focused features are nice, it needs support for extensions to compete with other browsers. Above all else, it definitely needs a good ad-blocker. If you're using the DuckDuckGo extension in Firefox or Chrome, you are not missing much, except for the Fire button.
Have you tried DuckDuckGo for Mac?
And doesn’t have a home button ??
Will this browser make sure I will not be presented with any misinformative articles while I’m using it also?
It is made to protect privacy. You then have to choose by yourself which site you trust. It’s not DDG’s job
What a weird comment. Why would you expect this?
First contact is not that good. I expected more from Duckduckgo.
I am quite sure that nobody will change from Firefox to Duckduckgo right now. Maybe in the future when there will be add-on support, password sync, banner blocking, etc.
I will nobody advice to change right now to the Duckduckgo browser.
I just did
lol so, just like Android?
literally I tested their app because I heard how it had adblocker on and it didn’t even block an ad.
It is made by a con-artist company owned by a con-artist, who uses the “we care about privacy” even in 2005 or whatever he was selling info, made with a terrible idea to use the OS’s native technology web rendering viewer. (and for people not having Edge or installing it they will be forced to have it and update it)
I really don’t understand what people expected from this if Android version was garbage too, and I don’t see people mentioning it much, but because of a ‘feature’, every typed URL by users was sent to their servers.
And people talking about addons… who will even write addons for this? I mean, there are some popular addons who have a year to come with their manifestv3 version and they haven’t even really started that.
I understand why the article tested it and used the Browser, it’s their job… but can’t understand why people are so desperate to stop using whatever they were using before for a closed beta software that sucks as expected.
I mean, just use Firefox or Opera or Vivaldi or Brave or Librewolf or whatever, they will offer anything you need, so why try a con-artist’s browser using privacy as a marketing scheme, just like their whole search engine and everything?
DDG always sucked compared to others, so why do people think this is going to be different and they have to support this company? I mean, just the fact that many donations go to political propaganda machine organizations that care even less about privacy is a red flag and how they even hire based on gender and race instead of skills should be even more of a red flag because they will hire the worst even if that means they will fill the quota, which has been proven over and over again by technology companies.
People like to try something new, if there was no one trying Vivaldi or Brave or Librewolf or whatever at the start, there will not gain any userbase, I don’t understand why you don’t understand this.
Who will write addons for this? It can use all Chrome extensions just like the other Chromium browsers you listed above?
I care less about privacy. If a browser is good, I will use it. I like using DDG on Android because it’s really fast with barebones features compared to other bloated browsers. I used to like the Edge Chrome on Windows but nowadays Microsoft keeps bloating it. I’m hoping that DDG on Windows someday will be able to fulfill my needs.
Funny that you mention privacy but still list Opera in the same paragraph. Firefox is also not so privacy safe and Brave is very questionable with the Crypto shilling.
If you don’t understand why people using a product, it means you are not the target market.
You need to set settings properly to your needs, that’s supported. The real point is deals between one of the search-engine owners, msoft Edge and DDG: Edge results are disturbing timelost, but i would give a beta a chance. If on mobile vs, then i search ‘deepl’ and get a result list, a first 1/2 screen filled with a FORM from the msoft translator without(…) notice, that it’s msoft’s.
Moreover: the recent G Weinberg-decision to comply with censorship is a disaster. How much did they promise or give to Gabriel W to do that? Censorship is self destruction of internet. Not same as moderating. Also wondering which permissions msoft got in exchange for fonts.
The browser layout is at least mobile very good on choices of button locations, not that brutal closing in to unwanted clicks as in ‘popular’ browsers. And it’s required filtering in time works, against hits showing up without proper date.
Are the people posting comments Mac users?
I know this article and topic is about a browser (DuckDuckGo for Mac) that works only on macOS.
I get the feeling that they want to be as stingy (and complaint) as they want about the browser that DuckDuckGo has created (and is creating).
Incidentally, I am also a user of Apple products, although I use a Windows machine.
This “DuckDuckGo for Mac” has an affinity with Apple’s browser “Safari” and I don’t feel any different for Apple users.
In essence, it is just an additional option for Apple users, and it is up to the end user to decide whether to use it or not.