Vreel Stage6 Clone further delayed

Martin Brinkmann
May 7, 2008
Updated • Dec 14, 2012
Music and Video

Vreel, which was shortly named Divxit, is a Stage6 clone that appeared back in April. The frontpage did not reveal a lot of information at first which changed after the name change. A Questions and Answers section was added which tried to answer several of the pressing questions that must have flooded the inboxes of the developers.

Today should have been the day where Vreel goes live but unfortunately though this is not going to happen. The date has changed from May 6th to May 2008 and they have added a temporary forum and added several new questions to the FAQ.

And the information there make me doubt that the service will last long enough to become a serious competitor. In the forum thread "Why aren't you launched yet" three answers are given why Vreel has not launched yet.

Firstly, our (previous) lead programmer liked to keep us guessing by vanishing for days at a time - making it near impossible to communicate any changes to him. I'm not sure if he's even aware that we've switched to Vreel.net. We're currently working with a highly regarded coder team, in order to avoid any further delays and disappointment.

So they switched from one coder to a coding team. It does look however make them look relatively amateurish.

Secondly, this thing has literally exploded since we started up - following the green light we got from DivX, we got a huge amount of attention - and a couple of servers based in the US just wasn't going to cut it anymore. Limelight Networks approached us with a contract with thousands of servers all over the world at 1.8TB/s+ connectivity - which we just couldn't turn down. This does add on a small workload, and will slightly lengthen the testing process - but we shouldn't be looking at any sort of dramatic time increase here.

That's an understandable reason. Adding new servers, or a cluster of servers from another network should take a while.

And finally, we're in the process of speaking with advertisement partners. As any videophile in the world can tell you, streaming HD video eats bandwidth like there's no tomorrow - and rather than collapse under our own debt within a month, we'd prefer to find a solution which will allow us to run freely, without having to shut down most of our servers, or forcing a paid subscription.

This reason is the one I'm worried about most. They do not have a monetization concept yet which should be one of the first concerns when planning a high definition video portal. The Divx creators were not able to monetize their portal properly and decided to shut it down because of bandwidth and maintenance costs. What makes you think they will succeed where a company with huge ties in the Industry could not ?


Tutorials & Tips

Previous Post: «
Next Post: «


  1. Martin said on May 7, 2008 at 5:10 pm

    Slugg I hope that they succeed, really but I have seen startups like this one fail many times in the past and the signs so far seem to suggest the same.

  2. Slugg said on May 7, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    I dont get why everyone is attacking these guys! They already said that it was a small project which quickly got out of hand, and now they’re trying to deliver on it. Delays are going to happen when something that big is being built.

    All we can do is wait and see, I think it will be worth it :)

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

We love comments and welcome thoughtful and civilized discussion. Rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please stay on-topic.
Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.