I always asked myself what the main reason for DRM - digital rights media - really is. It - maybe - can be used to stop legit buyers from giving a song to their friends or relatives but it surely does not step the spreading of music at all.
Music pirates do get the music before any shop has them in their inventory which in turn means that anyone with a little bit of knowledge of P2P services can get their hands on the music for free and before legit customers can.
If it's not about preventing the music from being spread, what is it about then? That's the question. My thoughts are that someone sold DRM to the CEOs and Executives and that they, with their limited technical understanding thought that it would prevent music piracy. In the end, only the consumers who purchase music are screwed, as you can see in this fine example.
Sony decided to close down its Connect music store that tried to push a proprietary format that only works with supported devices. This miserably failed and that is probably the main reason for the closure. The problem for consumers however is that the music that was purchased from that store had DRM included in it.
Don't worry, the music will play just fine after the store closes down, that is, unless you happen to change your computer hardware. Because at this point, it will stop playing. Ain't that great ? You bought music thinking that you could enjoy it for the rest of your life only to find out that it won't play if you change computer hardware or use a new computer.
I'm not sure how you see this but I think that this is absolutely unacceptable. If they want to use DRM they have to make sure that music will play even if they decided to close down their store or change their policy or whatever. My advice: Don't buy music with DRM, ever.
Closing lines are from the Download Squad article, very fitting I think:
DRM does not prevent piracy. DRM merely shafts loyal, paying customers who choose to legitimately obtain their media online
Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.
We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats (video ads) or subscription fees.
If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.