There has been a lot of controversy about the recent acquisition of uTorrent by Bram Cohen, the creator of the Bittorent protocol. Most users seem to be disturbed about the partnership between Bittorrent and the MPAA which started in fall 2005 with the agreement that illegal searches would be removed from its own Bittorrent search engine. The fear that the cooperation will affect the development of the popular uTorrent client seems to grow with every passing day.
"Following the acquisition, patented content delivery innovations made by BitTorrent, Inc. will be integrated in the µTorrent client in a manner that will remain seamless to the community of users. Ultimately, the integration of best-of-breed BitTorrent technology will result in an improved client and an enhanced user experience. It will also accelerate BitTorrent's plans to provide high-performance content delivery services that power websites seeking the most efficient platform for distributing large, high-quality files. Lastly, the incorporation of µTorrent's lightweight codebase strengthens the adoption of BitTorrent technology in embedded systems, including televisions, mobile phones and other non-PC platforms."
Utorrent on the other hand does not seem to be the only BitTorent client that is rumored to be affiliated with content creators and rights holders. Rumors emerged earlier this month that Azureus (VUZE) another popular client was transferring information about downloads and uploads to remote servers as well.
So what are some of the alternatives that you can use instead of uTorrent or Vuze? Below is a small list with options.
Alternatives:
Some users prefer to switch clients based on those rumors which is totally understandable. But which clients can be used except the most popular ones? Here is a list of alternatives.
Clients no longer in development:
Some clients come close to match uTorrent's functionality. If I had to pick one, I'd probably select qBittorrent from the list as it is fast and cross-platform.
AdvertisementAdvertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.
We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.
If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:
Please click on the following link to open the newsletter signup page: Ghacks Newsletter Sign up
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.
Re: Azureus – I doubt that there would be something fishy going on in there. It’s an open source client, so anyone can see the source. It would be blatantly obvious, and easy to figure out exactly what data is sent and when.
The article you linked to shows absolutely no proof for their claims – just unsubstantiated accusations. I don’t think there is any reason for concern regarding Azureus. I think that dude is simply fishing for diggs.
I agree that the claims are not backed up with sources but it should at least make you think about it. Here are some additional sources for Azureus:
http://www.slyck.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=341913
I think best program ever was uTorrent 1.3 without all that useless stuff and limits.
Anyway, on my dedicated server I use TorrentFlux – it’s torrent with web-interface and user management system. Very easy and convinient to use.
One way of handling with the new situation would be to turn of automatic updates in uTorrent to make sure it does not update itself automatically with “problematic features”.
anyone has a link to a previous version of utorrent dating back from like 2 weeks ago or more
so i can revert to an older version..
http://oldversion.com/program.php?n=utorrent
Even if you use older version of utorent, that won’t save you from being blocked from the network by peer guardian and other torrent clients… and I can see it coming soon…. http://phoenixlabs.org/2006/03/07/the-µtorrent-fiasco/
Arctic works good too..though no DHT support. It’s made by the guy who made PeerGuardian ;)
I never knew there was this issue… will continue following this thread.
Artic v1.2.3 seems to have VERY VERY low footprint and do what I need to do, although its featureless compared to utorrent, bitcomet, azureus etc.
P.S. Even if its about ~700kb(the executable file) which is more than utorrent it uses less memory and cpu than the utorrent in the same load!! Try it, just to test it.
Whatever you do, don’t go on the uTorrent forum and post a feature request or ask for help.
For a ‘legitimate’ software company they run their forum an awful lot like 4chan lite. My experience.