BitTorrent Sync: free plan folder limit lifted, new personal Pro pay-once plan

Martin Brinkmann
Sep 13, 2015
Updated • Aug 29, 2019
Internet
|
11

We have covered BitTorrent Sync several times before here on Ghacks as we have followed the file synchronization solution closely ever since the first alpha version was released back in 2013.

The main appeal of the product is its direct device to device synchronization capabilities. This is great for privacy as data is not parked or stored permanently in the cloud. While it means that both devices need to be online, it ensures that data is not stored on a server farm that you have no control over.

Functionality and pricing was introduced with the release of BitTorrent Sync 2.0 back in March 2015. The announcement caused quite the controversy as it limited the root folder count that you could sync with the software to ten. Since the limitation was not available previously, it looked as if the company wanted to get users to sign up for Pro accounts which were available for $39.99 per year at that time.

Update: BitTorrent Sync has been spun-off by BitTorrent Inc. The solution is called Resilio Sync now. A free plan is still available for Home users. End

BitTorrent Inc announced on Friday that it made the decision to change pricing and functionality for personal users.

bittorrent sync 2.2 changes pricing

Good news is that the free version remains, and that the ten folder limit has been lifted. This means that free users can once again add as many root folders to the application as they like without having to worry about reaching the artificial limit.

The new pricing table on the official website reveals another change: the company added a Pro version for individuals to the list of available plans.

Individuals who sign up for it pay a one-time fee of $39.99 instead of the yearly subscription fee that businesses pay that want to use the Pro functionality.

Differences between Free and Pro (individual), and Pro (individual) and Pro (business)

The two core differences between free and pro individual plans are that pro users get access to the selective sync feature (formerly known as sync all) which they can use to sync some but not all contents of a folder, and that they can change folder access permissions.

What individual pro users don't get are team management functionality and priority support, both of which are only available for business users who sign up for the pro subscription plan. This was not the case previously as all Pro customers received priority support.

The FAQ answers questions existing pro users may have. Individual Pro users may switch to the non-subscription license. Emails with instructions and information will be made available to all pro customers according to BitTorrent Inc.

It appears that individual Pro licenses won't provide lifetime upgrades, at least that's how I interpret the following Q and A.

Q: If I purchase a non-subscription license of Sync for personal use, will I be charged for major product updates in the future?

A: Non-subscription licenses will be subject to the standard product warranty but no Priority subscription support

Now You: Are you a BitTorrent Sync user? What's your take on the changes?

Summary
BitTorent Sync: free plan folder limit lifted, new personal Pro pay-once plan
Article Name
BitTorent Sync: free plan folder limit lifted, new personal Pro pay-once plan
Description
BitTorrent Sync free users can sync as many folders as they like once again with the most recent update. There is also a new pay-once individual Pro plan.
Author
Publisher
Ghacks Technology News
Logo
Advertisement

Tutorials & Tips


Previous Post: «
Next Post: «

Comments

  1. XenoSilvano said on September 14, 2015 at 11:48 pm
    Reply

    That is more like it(!)

    “Good news is that the free version remains, and that the ten folder limit has been lifted.” – The first thought that crossed my mind when I read this sentence was “ah *sigh* #### yes!”

    *kisses teeth* yearly subscription my ass(!)

    A yearly payment so that I can select what is downloaded and how many folders you get to sync over my own damn network(!?)
    Get the #### out of here! That #### should be free!

    I am still disappointed that I am not getting the speeds out of BitTorrent Sync that I am with TeamViewer’s File Transfer feature.

  2. Zon Dom said on September 14, 2015 at 2:21 pm
    Reply
    1. webfork said on September 16, 2015 at 8:38 pm
      Reply

      Martin’s highlighted this one: https://www.ghacks.net/2014/05/13/syncthing-open-source-bittorrent-sync-alternative/

      … I’m still not totally clear on it’s status as portable (i.e. run off a flash drive) but I definitely prefer an openly developed tool for backing up essential data.

    2. Teiji said on September 15, 2015 at 4:34 pm
      Reply

      So this is like BitTorrent Sync but open source?

      Do you know if it syncs even if the file is still open (ie. I save an excel but it is still open)? Dropbox does it, but BT Sync doesn’t do it, last I checked.

      1. webfork said on September 16, 2015 at 8:37 pm
        Reply

        I don’t know about SyncThing, but I’d look into something that does “shadow” copying like Cobian or several others (I recommend Bvckup highlighted here https://www.ghacks.net/2015/03/17/whats-the-best-free-file-synchronization-software-for-windows/).

    3. Kalama said on September 14, 2015 at 6:30 pm
      Reply

      Indeed. You said it.

  3. insanelyapple said on September 14, 2015 at 1:50 pm
    Reply

    I’m still not sure if it’s safe to use it.

  4. Rayr said on September 14, 2015 at 10:03 am
    Reply

    @DonGateley

    I might be wrond but I think the “Pro bundle” is a one time $40.

  5. DonGateley said on September 13, 2015 at 10:16 pm
    Reply

    Still a lousy deal IMHO. Without selective sync and folder permissions a sync app is useless to me and $40/yr is too much to pay.

    1. XenoSilvano said on September 14, 2015 at 11:53 pm
      Reply

      You get the pro version for a one time payment, however, you will BitTorrent might make you pay again for every updated version of the client, that is if my understanding is correct.

  6. Munchulax said on September 13, 2015 at 7:42 pm
    Reply

    “BitTorent” should be “BitTorrent” in the article name.

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

We love comments and welcome thoughtful and civilized discussion. Rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please stay on-topic.
Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.