Must Microsoft Offer a Direct Upgrade Path from XP to Windows 8?

Mike Halsey MVP
Apr 13, 2011
Updated • Apr 13, 2011
Microsoft, Windows, Windows 8, Windows XP

Microsoft came under heavy fire with the launch of Windows 7 for not offering a direct migration path from XP. The older operating system, which is now ten years old, is something Microsoft and many other technology firms are keen to move users away from because of its inherent problems with security.

There were perfectly legitimate technical reasons for not offering a direct upgrade path. The underlying technologies in Windows XP and Windows 7 are very different and it was clear to testers early on that many software packages would need to be reinstalled. This didn't help Microsoft however as all copies of Windows, and they're still doing this for reasons I can't fathom, store the user's files and folders on the same partition or physical hard disk as the copy of Windows. These 'shell user folders' have become significantly easier to move in recent years but even so most users would never be aware of how they can do this.

Thus, the vast majority of Windows users are left with their files and folders sitting in the same physical location as Windows and then facing, potentially, the cost of an external hard disk to move them. That is of course assuming they even know how to perform an operation such as this.

The Windows Easy Transfer program supplied on the Windows 7 installation DVD could perform this task for you, but even that wasn't obvious to find for most users and thus the upgrade path from XP to Windows 7 was problematic at best.

Windows XP is ten years old now and will be even older by the time Windows 8 arrives. It could easily be argued that any computer running Windows XP would need to be replaced by now. There are three problems with this. The first assumes that XP is running on a ten year old computer. New computers that were on sale in 2009 were still being shipped with XP and this hardware would be more than capable of running the new OS when it arrives. The second is the assumption that older hardware still won't be able to run the new OS. We've yet to see any real-world performance information but we have now seen a copy of Windows running on an ARM processor at only 1GHz. That's not more than half the processor speed of the earliest netbook. It's reasonable to assume then that Windows 8 will run happily, if perhaps a bit slowly, on ageing hardware and that an upgrade to Windows 8 should work for some people.

The last point with this is that we have just been through a worldwide economic downturn and it's entirely possible that many people will have bought cheap new computers without an operating system and simply had their existing copy of XP moved over to it. These computers would be more than capable of running Windows 7 or Windows 8, but the cost of moving to Windows 7 might have been too much for some people. Let's not forget that XP has always been fairly forgiving when moving a licence from one computer to another.

So already we have a multitude of scenarios in which people might still be happily running Windows XP by the time Windows 8 is released late next year. So what do we expect Microsoft to do to support these people?

One interesting snippet came from a Windows 8 installer leak where the OS is seen to offer to keep the users files and, optionally, programs, during the install. Now I've already said that it would be difficult if not impossible to transfer existing installed programs to a new copy of Windows 8, but the ability to retain a users files would significantly ease the pain for many XP users. This scenario has not been tested yet though and isn't feature complete anyway, so we'll have to wait and see.

There is another alternative though and it's one that I'm keen to see Microsoft try. There has long been speculation that XP Mode, which is an optional virtual machine running a fully-licenced copy of XP for Windows 7 Professional and above, would be built into the next version of Windows. The reasons and benefits for this are many. The operating system is smaller and lighter (Windows 8 can install apparently in as little as ten minutes) and more secure requiring fewer patches. Most patches and updates are for older legacy components. Stripping these out would make the OS much more secure.

There will be people then who perhaps either don't have the original installers for some software, or that have software that won't run on editions of Windows newer than XP. If XP Mode then can install a clean VM copy of Windows XP on your computer, and is built on the old Microsoft Virtual PC technology, could the Windows 8 installer create a virtual machine of an existing Windows XP setup and allow the user access to this through the in-built VM?

We'll have some time to wait before we get an answer to this and, sadly, that answer could very well be that Microsoft won't even bother. The company made clear with Windows 7 that upgrading from XP simply wasn't possible. At the time Windows 7 launched however you still needed a processor that would support virtual machines in order to get XP Mode to work. Not long after Windows 7 shipped Microsoft made changes to the XP Mode program that allowed it to run on any processor. It's not too much of a stretch then to believe that such a feature could work and be built into the Windows 8 installer, if Microsoft felt so inclined as to be helpful.

Personally I'm not too hopeful that any of this will actually happen, which is a pity because the world desperately needs to move people away from the insecure Windows XP and all the problems that come with it, such as people still using Internet Explorer 6, which is a security nightmare. None of us, regardless of what operating system we use, can rest safe from botnet and other virus attacks for as long as so many vulnerable computers still exist in the world. For many then, Microsoft taking the lead and properly helping people to move away simply can't come soon enough.


Tutorials & Tips

Previous Post: «
Next Post: «


  1. Some Dude said on March 19, 2023 at 11:42 am

    Are these articles AI generated?

    Now the duplicates are more obvious.

    1. boris said on March 19, 2023 at 11:48 pm

      This is below AI generated crap. It is copy of Microsoft Help website article without any relevant supporting text. Anyway you can find this information on many pages.

  2. Paul(us) said on March 20, 2023 at 1:32 am

    Yes, but why post the exact same article under a different title twice on the same day (19 march 2023), by two different writers?
    1.) Excel Keyboard Shortcuts by Trevor Monteiro.
    2.) 70+ Excel Keyboard Shortcuts for Windows by Priyanka Monteiro

    Why oh why?

    1. Clairvaux said on September 6, 2023 at 11:30 am

      Yeah. Tell me more about “Priyanka Monteiro”. I’m dying to know. Indian-Portuguese bot ?

  3. John G. said on August 18, 2023 at 4:36 pm

    Probably they will announce that the taskbar will be placed at top, right or left, at your will.

    Special event by they is a special crap for us.

  4. yanta said on August 18, 2023 at 11:59 pm

    If it’s Microsoft, don’t buy it.
    Better brands at better prices elsewhere.

  5. John G. said on August 20, 2023 at 4:22 am

    All new articles have zero count comments. :S

  6. Anonymous said on September 5, 2023 at 7:48 am

    WTF? So, If I add one photo to 5 albums, will it count 5x on my storage?
    It does not make any sense… on google photos, we can add photo to multiple albums, and it does not generate any additional space usage

    I have O365 until end of this year, mostly for onedrive and probably will jump into google one

  7. St Albans Digital Printing Inc said on September 5, 2023 at 11:53 am

    Photo storage must be kept free because customers chose gadgets just for photos and photos only.

  8. Anonymous said on September 5, 2023 at 12:47 pm

    What a nonsense. Does it mean that albums are de facto folders with copies of our pictures?

    1. GG said on September 6, 2023 at 8:24 am

      Sounds exactly like the poor coding Microsoft is known for in non-critical areas i.e. non Windows Core/Office Core.

      I imagine a manager gave an employee the task to create the album feature with hardly any time so they just copied the folder feature with some cosmetic changes.

      And now that they discovered what poor management results in do they go back and do the album feature properly?

      Nope, just charge the customer twice.

      Sounds like a go-getter that needs to be promoted for increasing sales and managing underlings “efficiently”, said the next layer of middle management.

  9. d3x said on September 5, 2023 at 7:33 pm

    When will those comments get fixed? Was every editor here replaced by AI and no one even works on this site?

  10. Scroogled said on September 5, 2023 at 10:47 pm

    Instead of a software company, Microsoft is now a fraud company.

  11. ard said on September 7, 2023 at 4:59 pm

    For me this is proof that Microsoft has a back-door option into all accounts in their cloud.
    quote “…… as the MSA key allowed the hacker group access to virtually any cloud account at Microsoft…..”

    so this MSA key which is available to MS officers can give access to all accounts in MS cloud.This is the backdoor that MS has into the cloud accounts. Lucky I never got any relevant files of mine in their (MS) cloud.

  12. Andy Prough said on September 7, 2023 at 6:52 pm

    >”Now You: what is your theory?”

    That someone handed an employee a briefcase full of cash and the employee allowed them access to all their accounts and systems.

    Anything that requires 5-10 different coincidences to happen is highly unlikely. Occam’s razor.

  13. TelV said on September 8, 2023 at 12:04 pm

    Good reason to never login to your precious machine with a Microsoft a/c a.k.a. as the cloud.

  14. Anonymous said on September 18, 2023 at 1:23 pm

    The GAFAM are always very careless about our software automatically sending to them telemetry and crash dumps in our backs. It’s a reminder not to send them anything when it’s possible to opt out, and not to opt in, considering what they may contain. And there is irony in this carelessness biting them back, even if in that case they show that they are much more cautious when it’s their own data that is at stake.

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

We love comments and welcome thoughtful and civilized discussion. Rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please stay on-topic.
Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.