I have not done any tests lately that would reveal the speed of each of the new upcoming browsers. The latest official builds have been tested, they are at the time of the test: Opera 9.5 build 9815/1834, Firefox 3 Gran Paradiso beta 4 and Internet Explorer 8 beta 1. I have been using the Webwait application for this test which monitors page loading times of pages that you select.
All browsers were already in memory and the following pages were each loaded once to avoid cache issues: Digg, CNN, Ghacks and Facebook. The results were pretty astonishing and I’m still thinking that some of the slow loading times might have been caused by a server hickup or a short prob with my Internet connection although I did not see any signs for that on my part. Another possible cause could be add-ons that have are already working in Firefox.
The most astonishing values are two page loading times of Firefox 3. It tool 13.17 seconds to load Digg while Opera needed 5.59 seconds and Internet Explorer 8 only 5.28 seconds. The second huge difference was encountered on Facebook where Opera 9.5 was the fastest browser with a loading time of 1.95 seconds.
Internet Explorer 8 followed with 2.83 seconds and Firefox 3 needed 22.60 seconds to load the page. Firefox on the other hand was the fastest browser when loading my site with 1.9 seconds followed by Opera with 2.38 and Internet Explorer with 4.83 seconds.
The same can be said for the loading time of CNN where Firefox needed 2.94 seocnds, Opera 3.38 seconds and Internet Explorer 8 4.58 seconds.
The only two values that stick out are the Firefox loading times of Facebook and Digg. Anyone here who would like to test the speeds on their connection and post the results in this thread ?
Related posts:
Opera 9.5 Alpha releasedGran Paradiso rocks the web
Test Your Browser’s JavaScript Performance
Opera 10 Alpha Passes Acid 3 Test
Firefox vs. Opera vs. Internet Explorer
30 Responses to “Speed Test: Firefox 3 vs. IE 8 vs Opera 9.5”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
-
[...] While Firefox 3 will come with a plethora of bux fixes and minor updates, but the biggest change this time around comes with what some have called the “Awesome Bar”. The new address bar takes the few characterstyped within it and gives the user a number of options for sites pertaining to it, consisting of sites already visited as well as those that have been already bookmarked. Also good news is that the new Firefox will be far less of a memory hog than its predecessors, having already proven itself well in speed tests. [...]
When I loaded Digg (which I never visit) into FF3b4 over a pretty loaded corporate network with a 100Mbit feed (no, it’s not a direct pipe, theres QoS policies and a firewall in the way), it loaded in 7.96sec, the next load took only 2.56sec.
-2.22 for facebook
-22.93 for digg
Hi,
Great Blog,
My results using Firefox 2.0.0.12 and a 512kbps Broadband Connection were
Digg – 14.09
Facebook – 19.11 (That’s Gotta Be A Record)
GHacks – 23.88 (But Wait, It Gets Better)
CNN – 60.86 (That just can’t be right)
Anyway, Make what you like of those
Facebook and Digg both use forms of browser detection that look for ‘Firefox’ in the browser’s user-agent string. The problem you’re seeing is because pre-release verions of Firefox 3 announce themselves as ‘Minefield’ instead.
While any form of browser detection is a bad idea, sites that have to do it should actually look in the user-agent string for ‘Gecko’, the underlying engine used by Firefox and an increasing number of other browsers
FF 2
digg 9.52
ghacks 2.71
facebook 3.87
cnn 13.55
FF 3
digg 10.84
ghacks 2.91
facebook 5.02
cnn 12.39
FF 4
digg 10.22
ghacks 2.83
facebook 4.51
cnn 12.17
IE 8
digg 13.53
ghacks 9.98
facebook 5.39
cnn 20.27
Opera 9.5 (could not test with webwait)
digg
ghacks
facebook
cnn
(sorry for the terrible format of results, was in great hurry :) )
I got different results:
Facebook, with Firefox 3 : 11.28 seconds
Facebook, with Opera 9: 29.84 seconds
Digg.com got stuck in both Firefox and Opera, with the statusbar in FF reading ‘Transferring data from y.digg.com’ which turns out to be a Hitbox counter
I think it is still too early to judge firefox, Im sure they will deal with speed optimization before they release. They are doing major overhaul changes every build.
its because digg sucks
Also check out other benchmarks,
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=8203
Firefox has capabilities that have not be really unleashed. If you want check out my results with firefox 3b4
Applying the following tweaks:
Quick and Dirty Settings
Fast Computer Fast Connection
Common to all configurations
http://www.tweakfactor.com/articles/tweaks/firefoxtweak/4.html
and the results are:
http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/156/firefoxhr4.jpg
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/1240/firefox2zf0.jpg
As you can see I got a 2.03 Second benchmark result for facebook. I would love to write detailed guide on how to do it without all the hassle of going through all the old outdated guides.
ok… uhmm… i’m running ff3b4, here’s my results:
http://www.digg.com/ –> 6.22s
http://www.cnn.com/ –> 8.38s
http://www.ghacks.net/ –> 2.98s
http://www.facebook.com/ –> 6.60s
just installed opera Version 9.25 Build 687
same order:
16.62s
14.86s
4.90s
2.42s
not sure i really want to send this as i know it’s very useless :D
These results are really confusing, is there some benchmark for these tests and results
Yeah! they indeed are looking confusing. I also wonder if someone can come with a standardized way to test these big websites loading time to gauge the performance. Although theoretically ajax intensive websites should load/render very fast in Firefox 3.0 b4 because of the enhancements that they have made. Unfortunately personally I can’t test it very authentically because I am on a very slow connection(for now).
Actually, for digg.com at least, I find that if I just prematurely kill the loading once the website looks loaded (I have no idea why the digg page takes so long to load when most of it loads within three seconds, is it hanging on some image or something?). Nothing big happens, it’s just annoying. I hope they get this fixed before final release.
Have anyone tried the new Beta 5?
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
CNN.com: 14 seconds with FF3B4
FF 3beta5
Digg-7.39s
CNN 9.45s
Facebook 5.17s
weird everyone must have slow connections all my pages load instantly on each browser opera has been the fasted and so hase firfox 3, safari is ok but lags, and ie 8 vista lags some too so far i like firefox 3 dont have 2 on mine cuz for some reason it lags ALOT
Trying FF3RC2 for first time. Latest IE8 release is still B1. My results:
FF3RC2 CNN=2.99 Digg=5.84 Facebook=1.31 GHacks=3.28
IE8B1 CNN=7.70 Digg=6.23 Facebook=7.09 GHacks=6.08
I am on a residential cable line, shared with 3 other computers on a 2 year old computer. This was the first time I visited any of those 4 sites on these browsers (or this computer for that matter) so I don’t think caching played a part.
Personally, I just installed FF3RC2 today and was immediately surprised at the speed on pages I frequent regularly. Probably 3x faster over what I was seeing with FF2 for some sites.
There are so many variables that you will never get a valid speed test. Everything from your systems mem/cpu load at the time of browsing, your router, your carriers exchange, your isp, the web route to the website, the bandwidth available to the website, the number of users on any of the above, the number of downloads/bandwidth to or from any one of the above, the time of day (carriers share/donate their capacity to other carriers under load) etc, etc. It aint never going to show you the relative speed of one browser versus another. Just select a browser based on features you need/like and on how much security does/doesnt matter to you.
I tested Firefox 3 Final.
My bandwith is 1 Mbs
Facebook: 4,8 sek
Digg: 15,2 sek
You are testing Webwait, not the browsers.
And the conclusion is : Webwait returns random results and should be removed from your PCs :-)
I tested firefox3 Final w/ black aero theme.
5 meg cable connection.
Digg 2.8 sec
Facebook 2.9 sec
ghacks 2.9 sec
p.s. The aero theme actually feels a hair slower than the default ffox theme
p.s.s I used a stopwatch, not webwait
p.s.s.s the only siete that was cached was facebook
digg took 6 seconds
facebook took 2 seconds
google took under 1 second
youtube took under 2 seconds
Hello guys, i used opera for 5 years, since opera 7 was releasd
OK, I test Google Mail
by the way I’m leaving in iran and my internet speed is ~40kbps
Opera 9.5 ~21 s Gmail(older version) ~28 s
IE 7 ~ 35 s (older version) ~ 43 s
FF 3 ~ 23 s (older version) ~ 27 s
Just test Opera 9.52 for 1 time, I know you will love it
for me opera is the best i mean very little against firefox aqnd for me is more firendly user (pretty lol) so ill stick with opera
Firefox 3 is by far the fastest browser in the market. Firefox Loading problems with the above mentioned pages is due to firwall settings. I tested IE 7 Opera 9.64 and Firefox 3.0.7. All 3 with the same firewall settings used in KIS 2008. Firefox was 40% fastest than the other 2. With Opera and IE to be very close. If you use Firefox 3.0.7 and you have KIS 2008 you have to modify your firewall not to monitor the network traffic of firefox. This will have as an effect many ads and banners. However, by putting adblockplus the problems get solved. This is due to the fact that KIS 2008 has default settings for ONLY 2 Browsers, Opera and IE. So, if you use firefox the KIS 2008 will assign settings automatically as internet browser type “IE and Opera”. But this will cause certainly a problem with accessing pages since firefox has totally different code than IE and Opera. Hence, change the firewall settings.
I forgot to tell you that if you are lacking memory, do not use firefox, just use opera. Otherwise the fox is unbeatable.
I get around 3 seconds for Facebook and same with Digg.