Dropbox Transfer: new WeTransfer-like large file sharing service - gHacks Tech News

Dropbox Transfer: new WeTransfer-like large file sharing service

Dropbox unveiled a new product called Dropbox Transfer the other day. The new service is currently available to select customers only but will become available to all Dropbox users in the near future.

Dropbox Transfer attempts to address issues associated with the sharing of large files on the Internet. Email is not really an option for that due to its attachment limit and Dropbox itself is not the most elegant of solutions when it comes to sharing files quickly without having to worry about permissions and such.

Dropbox wants Transfer to close the gap in the company's portfolio. While not explicitly mentioned, it appears that a Dropbox account is required to create a new file share. Dropbox notes that users who download the files don't need an account though.

dropbox transfer

The maximum file size that Dropbox Transfer supports is 100 Gigabytes; files may come from the local system or may be picked directly from a user's Dropbox to speed up the sharing even further. Dropbox does not reveal if the file size will count against a user's quota on the size. Recipients download copies of the files so that originals remain untouched.

Dropbox Transfer supports a number of interesting options to customize the file sharing. File owners may set passwords to protect unauthorized access, and there is an option to set an expiration rate to limit availability.

Other features include notifications of downloads to get confirmation that shared files were downloaded, and options to access statistics to find out how often a link was accessed.

Business users may change the download widget next to that by adding background images to make the download pages look more professionally.

Closing Words

Not all the details are known at this point in time; interested users can join a waiting list to gain access to the service early.

There is certainly no shortage when it comes to file sharing services. There is WeTransfer, a service that does not require registration, is free, and good for up to 2 Gigabytes. Mozilla launched Firefox Send recently as well which does not require an account and supports file sizes of up to 2.5 Gigabytes (for logged in users).

Whisply, another file sharing service, used Dropbox and other online storage services for file transfers.

Dropbox Transfer pushes the file limit significantly but it is unclear if the uploaded files count against a customer's quota on the site. Another thing that is unclear at this point is whether downloads are limited automatically.

Now You: What is your first impression of the new service?

Dropbox Transfer: new WeTransfer-like large file sharing service
Article Name
Dropbox Transfer: new WeTransfer-like large file sharing service
Dropbox unveiled a new product called Dropbox Transfer the other day to share files up to 100 Gigabyte in size with others on the Internet.
Ghacks Technology News

We need your help

Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.

We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.

If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:

Previous Post: «
Next Post: »


  1. ShintoPlasm said on July 11, 2019 at 11:22 am

    Firefox Send sucks butt. I tried to ‘Send’ a 2+ GB file through it and somehow it managed to crash its own tab in Firefox, and drop the download three times both in FF and Chrome. Pathetic, half-baked buggy offering.

    1. Paul(us) said on July 11, 2019 at 1:26 pm

      I agree with ShitoPlasm that I am also not satisfied at all with the Firefox send application.

      More than that I’ve tried the multiple times with other formats, but always it was going wrong.
      Hopefully Firefox will improve on this not only because I am not used that Mozilla products are not function well, but also because I grant them a well-functioning product as well.

  2. Jeff said on July 11, 2019 at 6:32 pm

    Just use BitTorrent Sync, or Telegram. Or create a torrent and any torrent client? What’s wrong with that – they all added encryption ages ago. Why even bother to register accounts and bother with expirations – so outdated.

    1. Yuliya said on July 11, 2019 at 6:57 pm

      This. I usually host the file myself on my PC. Never user sharing services to share a file with someone I know/trust, and on the upside is that the person I’m sharing with does not have to wait for the file host to get my file. Plus most file hosting services are slow as hell,

    2. Apparition said on July 11, 2019 at 7:00 pm

      Telegram requires a telephone number, (and a non-VoIP one at that). Never used Torrent. Seemed like too much of a PITA to bother to learn when most of the legal reasons to use torrents also provided downloadables on websites and FTP servers.

      1. Jeff said on July 11, 2019 at 8:17 pm

        If privacy is the concern, with BitTorrent Sync, you don’t even need to create a torrent file. Just set up a read-only or read-write folder to share and dump everything you wanna share in that folder. Look for an older version of BitTorrent Sync (1.3). That was a GEM.

      2. Peterc said on July 14, 2019 at 12:29 am

        Is the successor to BitTorrent Sync (“Resilio”?) functionally a “downgrade” in some way? I’m genuinely curious. I briefly looked into BitTorrent Sync when exploring file-syncing solutions, but as I was more interested in syncing between local drives, I didn’t follow through. It *could* be used for syncing files across different computers on a local-area network, though, right? And I seem to recall that it does delta-syncing, which is a BIG deal when you’re dealing with BIG files! (Well … provided it works flawlessly.)

  3. Richard Steven Hack said on July 12, 2019 at 12:45 am

    “Dropbox does not reveal if the file size will count against a user’s quota on the size.”

    Seriously? Is it not obvious that the point of this service is to cause existing Dropbox users to exceed their current limit or motivate them to increase their limit so more revenue goes to Dropbox.

    Not to mention: what ordinary consumer user has an Internet service which allows symmetric upload speeds sufficient to upload 100GB in less than, oh, a year? Only businesses might have such capability.

    If Dropbox had a service similar to some services where you can rent an actual hard drive, load it with data and send it to Dropbox to be made available over their service than that would make sense.

    But even then, you’d be paying Dropbox rates for that much data. Dropbox can’t begin to compete with Amazon or Google or Mega with their large, cheap limits.

    Uploading massive amounts of data – over a few gigabytes – to the cloud simply doesn’t work for most people.

  4. Peterc said on July 14, 2019 at 12:33 am

    So … does Condi Rice copy and analyze each transferred file *personally*, or does she delegate that work to interns on detached assignment from the alphabet agencies? ;-)

  5. Lara said on July 14, 2019 at 2:04 am

    Email do not allow to send large files. But you can use specialized programs like Binfer to bypass this limitation. With Binfer you can send large files of any size. You can drag and drop entire folders with hundreds to pictures. Check it out: https://www.binfer.com/solutions/tasks/secure-file-sharing/

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.

Be polite: we do not allow comments that threaten or harass, or are personal attacks. Please leave politics and religion out of discussions!