Samsung Unveils Revolutionary Technology for the Galaxy S23 Series
Samsung has confirmed that the next generation of Galaxies will be announced by the 1st of February. The S23 Series will come with Android 13 OS powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 with custom OneUI 5 skin. As I was doing my research, I discovered that the S23 would have three models, namely: Galaxy S23, the S23 Plus, and the S23 Ultra.
Based on the past, the S23 is usually the base model, and the Ultra usually packs all the extras, including extra cameras and the stylus. Here is a quick analysis of my discovery.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 and S23 Plus will both have an AMOLED panel that comes with FHD resolution and 120Hz refresh rate. Both phones will also come with 1750 nits, likely to be limited to HDR mode. According to the information received, both models will have high-class designs, something that galaxy models are famous for. The phones are also likely to be thinner in appearance than their predecessors. The S23 will come with a 6.1-inch screen, while the Plus will have a 6.6-inch one.
As if all these features weren't enough, the S23 comes in 4 amazing colors: botanic green, mystic lilac, cotton flower, and phantom black. The camera layout will remain the same with three individual circular camera cutouts: ultra wide angle, dedicated wide-angle, telephoto lens, and an improved selfie camera.
Both phones will also come with at least 8 GB of RAM and 256GB storage options, no SD card slot, and dual nano SIM card supporting a 5G network. The battery in the S23 will be 3900mAh, and the Plus will have a 4700mAh one. These are much bigger than the previous models, which means more battery life.
Moving onto the Ultra, the ultimate beast and Samsung’s secret weapon. it will come with a note-inspired design with a 6.8-inch curved AMOLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate and 2000 nits of peak brightness. It will come with a metal frame, glass finish, and a built-in S-Pen. The camera will come with a 200MP camera which is a first for a Samsung smartphone. The Ultra will have lowlight photography with a dedicated periscope zoom lens. The RAM will be at least 12GB with a minimum storage of 256GB.
Undoubtedly the new chipset and a 200MP Isocell HP2 image sensor. The 200MP camera on the Ultra model is the star feature of this show. If you’re looking for high speed, high-quality pictures, storage, and style, this is the phone you should go for.
Advertisement
Uhh, this has already been possible – I am not sure how but remember my brother telling me about it. I’m not a whatsapp user so not sure of the specifics, but something about sending the image as a file and somehow bypassing the default compression settings that are applied to inbound photos.
He has also used this to share movies to whatsapp groups, and files 1Gb+.
Like I said, I never used whatsapp, but I know 100% this isn’t a “brand new feature”, my brother literally showed me him doing it, like… 5 months ago?
Martin, what happened to those: 12 Comments (https://www.ghacks.net/chatgpt-gets-schooled-by-princeton-university/#comments). Is there a specific justifiable reason why they were deleted?
Hmm, it looks like the gHacks website database is faulty, and not populating threads with their relevant cosponsoring posts.
The page on ghacks this is on represents the best of why it has become so worthless, fill of click-bait junk that it’s about to be deleted from my ‘daily reads’.
It’s really like “Press Release as re-written by some d*ck for clicks…poorly.” And the subjects are laughable. Can’t wait for “How to search for files on Windows”.
> The page on ghacks this is on represents the best of why it has become so worthless, fill of click-bait junk…
Sadly, I have to agree.
Only Martin and Ashwin are worth subscribing to.
Especially Emre Çitak and Shaun are the worst ones.
If ghacks.net intended “Clickbait”, it would mark the end of Ghacks Technology News.
Ghacks doesn’t need crappy clickbaits. Clearly separate articles from newer authors (perhaps AIs and external sales person or external advertising man) as just “Advertisements”!
We, the subscribers of Ghacks, urge Martin to make a decision.
because nevermore wants to “monetize” on every aspect of human life…
“Threads” is like the Walmart of Social Media.
How hard can it be to clone a twitter version of that as well? They’re slow.
Yes, why not mention how large the HD files can be?
Why, not mention what version of WhatsApp is needed?
These omissions make the article feel so bare. If not complete.
Sorry posted on the wrong page.
such a long article for such a simple matter. Worthless article ! waste of time
I already do this by attaching them via the ‘Document’ option.
I don’t know what’s going on here at Ghacks but it’s obvious that something is broken, comments are being mixed whatever the article, I am unable to find some of my later posts neither. :S
Quoting the article,
“As users gain popularity, the value of their tokens may increase, allowing investors to reap rewards.”
Besides, beyond the thrill and privacy risks or not, the point is to know how you gain popularity, be it on social sites as everywhere in life. Is it by being authentic, by remaining faithful to ourselves or is it to have this particular skill which is to understand what a majority likes, just like politicians, those who’d deny to the maximum extent compatible with their ideological partnership, in order to grab as many of the voters they can?
I see the very concept of this Friend.tech as unhealthy, propagating what is already an increasing flaw : the quest for fame. I won’t be the only one to count himself out, definitely.
@John G. is right : my comment was posted on [https://www.ghacks.net/2023/08/23/what-is-friend-tech/] and it appears there but as well here at [https://www.ghacks.net/2023/07/08/how-to-follow-everyone-on-threads/]
This has been lasting for several days. Fix it or at least provide some explanations if you don’t mind.
> Google Chrome is following in Safari’s footsteps by introducing a new feature that allows users to move the Chrome address bar to the bottom of the screen, enhancing user accessibility and interaction.
Firefox did this long before Safari.
Basically they’ll do anything except fair royalties.