CopyMastro is an open source application that supports multi-threaded copying, folder based copy modes, task verification and more

Backing up your files to an external drive or the cloud is a good way to be prepared for unforeseen PC crashes or other issues.
If you are like me, and copy a bunch of folders from the computer to a USB drive, you'll know the risks. Explorer can crash in the middle of a copy process, you may have been away from the computer, or even left the process to complete it overnight.
The problem is, you may not know if the copying process was successful, and if it had crashed, you can't tell which files had been copied unless you manually verify each one of them yourself. I usually check the properties of the source and destination folders to ensure the file sizes, and the number of files/folders match before deciding whether to delete the source or to start the whole process again.
A simple log of the task would prove to be useful in such scenarios. This is where file copying utilities excel, they give you a clear picture of the process, and provide other useful functions.
CopyMastro is one such program and uses multi-threaded copying to accelerate the file copy process. The application's interface has four tabs. The primary tab is New Task. The program does not replace the Windows Copier like TeraCopy can, you'll need to use it manually.
Paste the path of the directory from which the files will be copied in the first box, or use the button next to the box to browse and select the source folder. Similarly, select the destination folder.
There are three copy modes that the program supports:
- Folder - This option copies the source folder and all its sub-folders to the destination directory. The contents are stored in a folder that has the source folder's name. If you want a 1:1 backup, this is the best option.
- Content - It works similar to the "Folder" mode, but the parent folder's name isn't used to rename the destination directory.
- Collate - Copies the files from the source folder and its sub-folders, but places all the content into a single folder in the destination directory, i.e. it discards the sub-folder structure. This option is useful for collecting all files of the same type from various folders and place them together in a single folder, e.g. Documents, music, videos, pictures, etc.
You may enable the "Simulate" option to preview the results without running the task.
Hang on, what if you want to copy a single file? Drag and drop it onto the interface, select the output folder and it will be copied when you run the task. Unfortunately you cannot add multiple files using this method. As a workaround, create a new folder and place the files you want to copy inside it and add it to the task. The program is not ideal when it comes to the copying of individual files because of that.
CopyMastro has some additional options that you can toggle. Recursive enables copying of files in sub-folders. You may also enable copying of hidden files, Symbolic Links, empty folders and files. Define the rules for overwriting existing files from the "If file exists" section. The program can skip files, always overwrite them, only replace older or different files. If you'd rather preserve all the data use the auto-rename option, this is recommended while using "Collate".
You can add filters which are basically wildcards that are used to whitelist and blacklist files, i.e., to include them in the copying process or to exclude them. The next step is to select what CopyMastro will do with the files. The application's primary function is to Copy files, i.e. make a duplicate based on the source folder and store them in the destination.
The Fix Errors option is grayed out, and the tool-tip will only be usable in case a copying task has errors. The Check Files can be used to verify if the copy process was successful. In case of errors, e.g. if some files weren't copied, or if you deleted some files from the destination folder, you can click on Fix errors and it will run the task again to copy the missing files.
The Clone and Move options are disabled by default, and can be enabled from the preferences. The Clone option as the name suggests is used for syncing folders, and will reflect changes that were made, i.e. files that were deleted in the source folder will also be deleted in the destination folder. The Move option on the other hand, will directly move the contents from the source to the destination.
Switch to the Current task tab in CopyMastro to view the stats of the process which includes information about how many folders, files, were moved, skipped, overwritten, etc.
Head to the Report tab and use the options available on this screen to see if all files were copied, if any were deleted, unprocessed, etc. The Log tab lists the task's properties, i.e., the settings which were used for the copying process.
CopyMastro is an open source software. It is available in portable versions for 32-bit and 64-bit systems. The program is also available for Linux and macOS.
Note: CopyMastro's preferences has a donation option that will unlock more features that are listed in the "Supporter options" tab.
Closing Words
CopyMastro is a powerful copy software that supports several different tasks, e.g. for backing up data, syncing data, or merging data from multiple folders. Its main downside is that it needs to be run manually; a program like TeraCopy may be the better option for users who want improved copy processes on Windows when using File Explorer and other file managers.
Now You: Do you use a third-party copy program on your systems?
The full quote is:
“The content is not stored or seen by any human unless donated as part of the feedback mechanism.”
How much time before that data collection and processing become consentless, like Microsoft likes to do ?
“Another way you can help refine this feature is to donate your actual emails so we can analyze their contents and improve the quality of suggestions in the future.”
*Pukes*
Am I the only one that wishes that MS would instead focus on fixing some of the more glaring issues with their software before implementing silly new gimmicks like this?
Outlook still loves to hang for several seconds at a time if there’s any issue accessing a mailbox (particularly a problem if you have several mailboxes open, or if your VPN connection temporarily drops). Quite why the server processing seems to share the same thread as the UI is beyond me.
I’m also sick of the recent bug in Outlook that won’t let you attach a document to an e-mail if it is open in another window. Thus forcing me to close the spreadsheet, attach it, then re-open it again. Weirdly, if it is in the “recent” list, it will attach without complaint.
Add onto this the horrible, cluttered interface in Outlook these days (so much white space and other huge elements) that make e-mail navigation a pain on a small screen and I can’t help think that fixing basic issues like these and improving the accessibility of the programs should be a far higher priority than a feature which 99% of people will probably just disable.
I want them to fix Windows 95. Instead, they flounder along with “upgrades” until they realize … oh, look: that “evolved” into an unfixable mess … lets “move on” to make a new shiny OS, and leave another bit of debris and more abandoned users in our wake.
This article is about Open Office, which is not connected to Microsoft.
Open Office is connected to this article about LibreOffice .. unless its about how you shouldn’t use OO..
Good for people who can’t spell This feature could be very annoying.
I will be turning this feature off, when it comes out for Word. I have been typing for decades, and know what I want. Having predictions come up regularly is a real pain and distraction. So I turn them off in email and on my iPhone and iPad.
I agree with Matthew B – after the latest Windows update, Word started doing this and it’s incredibly annoying. I can touch-type so I don’t need the predictions – it creates errors and slows me down.
Thanks Martin. The suggestions were annoying and sometimes inappropriate. I told Microsoft about it. I wanted to disable the suggestions and now I have. Good information.
I see the option in Outlook web and it is turned on, but I see no evidence of it actually working as I type a new email.
and fix the issue of search. search has been about the worst thing MS ever did in Outlook & since moving to the title bar has not improved and the fact default searches now are FROM: is bonkers /rant
this new feature is sh*t; it’s like a rearview camera (actually, its way worse, but the analogy is coming): the machines are taking over our need for intelligent thought.
But honestly, MSFT really ought to run focus groups that include people who have ADHD or photosensitive epilepsy. For us, this attempt to help productivity only significantly decreases it.
(It feels like we are all being treated to a dose of that brainwashing technique you see on the SyFi channel that involves a lot of flashing lights and images)
the worst part about any of this: that our comments, reactions, suggestions, thoughts… are never actually heard or acknowledged by any of these tech companies who just shove new crap onto our corporate PCs and don’t think twice about end user experience.
sorry y’all, rant over. for now.
I absolutely hate this feature. Thank you so much for the how-to to turn it off. Now that you pointed it out, I will know to check the tiny bar in the left corner, but I spent time I shouldn’t have had to trying to turn this feature off before finding your post.
I think “features” like this should be opt-in, not opt out, or should be much easier to find to turn off. And I agree with the suggestions above – there are plenty of other issues Microsoft needs to fix before adding “helpers” like this. One that wasn’t mentioned above – terrible grammar in the suggested grammar fixes. As often as they’re right, they’re wrong. And the database programmers need to learn the use of apostrophes…. Thanks for the rant space. :)
Thank you for posting this where I could find it and use it after an MS Office update today.
Sadly, this nonsense is the same thing I see my company implementing and me coding for them: window-dressing trinkets that are this year’s Christmas toys that everyone needs to be told that they want, while data-integrity code defects go un-addressed because no salesperson can make a commission off of us publishing their correction.
Our society is evolving, and being run by a generation that learned to communicate in broken grammar on their smartphone while nursing a five-second attention span.
They _want_ the machine to think for them. It is so much easier than thinking for one’s self.
Abdication of personal responsibility.
Corporate America is only too willing to step in, for a modest fee and your privacy.
We aren’t going to get Microsoft or anybody else to stop. There’s far too much money to be made at it.
As above, thanks for the rant space.
We will survive this, somehow.
So, Microsoft wants to use what we type to improve AI while charging me a hefty annual price for Office 365 subscriptions. Then someday AI will tell me what to see, think and do and its happening already. Someone needs to get a hold of the monster and put it back in the pit.
How will they profit from improving AI?
Thanks for this article, this behavior started on my machine yesterday no doubt a sneaky effect of an update. It was easy to fix using your instructions, but I suspect Word and Outlook are still “phoning home” everything I type even though the predictive text is shut off.
They think we’re all stupid. They should be paying us.
Thank you for the resourceful article! I looked for the status bar entry, but I couldn’t find it in the web version of Microsoft Word. What I did find, however, was Editor (between Dictate and Designer) above the opened document, and the option to disable suggested text was in there. Scroll down to Text Predictions and click the item’s “button” to turn this annoying feature off. I think Off should be default. I hate when developers set defaults for items they think I need. Adobe is another company that does that when people want or need to download the free or pro version of its Acrobat PDF Reader. I often tell my students to uncheck the boxes next to the McAfee antivirus and Chrome extension options before downloading the reader because they likely do not need them. I think these options should be unchecked by default. Let the consumers make up their own minds.
Thanks so much for telling us how to disable this intrusive feature – predictive text! It’s like having a know-it-all teacher always looking over your shoulder. Very irritating!
I can appreciate why some people would love this feature, and in some cases it makes sense where time is more critical. But it should not be the default.
Unfortunately, it seems to me that the programmers job is made simpler when the human conversation is simpler. Predictive text, if used, limits the conversation to a box only as big as a programmers imagination and literary ambition. I know a lot of programmers. Imagination is not their strong suit – no offense to creative programmers intended. Broadly speaking, to predict the manner in which I prefer to speak would require far more resources than they would ever allocate.
If it were up to me they would go the opposite direction as a software company. I want a far simpler interface with basic editing function and attachments. Anything more than that is a distraction and I can honestly say, totally ignored and certainly a distraction making me wish I wasn’t on outlook.
In the end, I disable nearly every “improvement” Microsoft offers, and check “metered connection” to prevent it’s downloads from happening in the middle of mastering a single for a customer. Of course that is not supposed to happen but we all know how real life works.
Ill pay 5x what they are charging if they strip it down to an OS that works as a background product and doesn’t need the internet and isn’t of bloatware. That OS would be pure gold, worth every penny.
Grateful to have found out how to turn it off. If this is how good AI is supposed to be then we’re in worse trouble than I thought.
Microsoft, and they’re not the only ones guilty of this, need to stop “giving us nice things” without asking us *FIRST* whether we want it or not.
I am sick to death of finding some new app running on my machine that I didn’t see before, didn’t ask for, and didn’t authorize. Then I look up on the web and it’s 15 steps to get rid of it. Christ, it wasn’t hardly ANY steps to get it!!
A true annoyance. I couldn’t believe this feature when it appeared and after tolerating it for a few days I did a ‘net search for disabling it. I’m a writer by trade and living, and this is antithetical to creation, whether fiction or non. In my mind, it reflects the whole dumbing down of this generation – it can give someone the appearance of being articulate, only to discover that they are anything but upon first meeting (or interview). Beware.
Thanks for the tip on how to turn it off, was the first hit when I looked it up. I’m not really willing to slow down and check what suggestions they offer me as someone who can type 115 wpm ?
Predictive text has sprung up on the desktop version and this article does not address that version. There is no “Text Predictions” on the desktop version to turn on or off.
I finally figured out how to turn it back off!! when it starts to add the prediction hover the mouse over the prediction and it will take you to ‘text prediction’ and you can deselect it.
Why ANYONE would want this is a question that boggles the mind.
It is VERY clear to me that every time the programmers have some lovely little hack they like, they are convinced ALL of us would like them. Not. I’m with what Bill said last July – I would pay a HUGE amount for a version of Word that would just stay the same and do what I want and that doesn’t have a bunch of bells and whistles that aren’t necessary. Please!!!!
Thank you!! I looked in vain in the too-full and too-many “Options” screens for a way to turn off this annoyance.
I wish there was a Notepad-on-caffine mode — not the wannabe one-size-fits-all unstable multimedia-editor-on-crack mode that might change erratically from day to day.
There are too many bells and whistles in Word. Remember WordPerfect? It behaved like traditional software: Do this until I tell you to do otherwise — and the current settings were visible in an optional “codes” pane. Instead, Word buries formatting, styles and who knows what else in the paragraph marker. If I want to change the format of something, it may presume to change all similar items in both directions in the document. Feh!!!
Back to your excellent post: thank you for letting know how turn off this unwanted “help” from the presumptuous twenty-somethings at M$.
The status bar toggle removes the annoyance in the current document, but it may be baaaack in a new document.
There is perhaps a more permanent way to dispose of this annoyance:
In the “File” menu, choose “Options”
Then in “Advanced” pane (listed at the left of the options), navigate to the “Editing options” section.
In that long list of micro-text, uncheck the box “Show text predications while typing.”
My hope is that this will get rid of “just one of the intrusive PITAs.”
The navigation above is for Word in Microsoft 365 Apps running on a desktop machine.
YMMV in other versions, and these instructions may be broken when M$ spews another “upgrade” of the version I am using on this machine.
Just noticed this was turned on, presumably by business IT admin. It’s atrocious, not at all usable, like Google’s is. Instead of accepting my typed words, it refused to allow me to add a space between words as I typed, instead waiting for me to accept or reject the suggested words. So unintuitive it’s not funny. Turned it off immediately.
You need to *right* click on the thingy in the status bar; left click brings up the Options dialog, and if this predictive typing thing is on the options dlg, I sure can’t find it. Right click brings up a long, unorganized (afaict) list of options that you can check or un-check, and somewhere in that long list is predictive typing.
I’m not sure how you’d turn predictive completion back on if you decided you want it, but that’s someone else’s problem.
Now if they’d only fix automatic number, which has been broken in every version of Word I’ve ever used.
The abruptness of it popping up and diverting my attention from my flow of thoughts is very distracting. I tried it for a short while and quickly decided it was slowing me down, making me stutter in my thoughts, and just generally getting in my way. I type plenty fast on a PC. Now on current phones with screen typing that is slow and prone to typos, yeah, you might want some predictive stuff to survive there. But I still do not want anybody snooping my info, so there is that.
How are you suppose to read this article when the adds are constantly popping up where I am reading and no matter how many times I knock them down, they return with the same message. Most times with a video that is over what i was reading. I am certain this article was helpful but I will never know because I got fed up with the ads that were trying to pull me away. One just popped up here because I am telling you about it.
What’s up with this place? All I can see in the comment sections of new articles are VERY OLD (as in several years) comments.
And my comment, posted in one article, is posted in a completly different one…
Very strange. This is the second time this week where there is a disconnect between the article and its comments!
I have had LibreOffice 7.6 for over a week. The only fault that I can find is that the help function still does not work in Ubuntu. It tries to find a web page that does not exist. This occurs in both the menu function of help and pressing F1.
I found this in earlier versions of 7.x, and reported it, but was brushed off.
I think it works in Windows, but I am not sure.
Did you download and install the separate optional help package, that does not come with the base package ? If not, I wouldn’t wonder.
Interesting. Article about Libre Office, but comments on MS and Word, dating back to sometime in 2021. Who’s in charge here?
LibreOffice is great. Some of our customers are still using outdated MS Office versions. With there okay, we install it and set the saved file formats to MS, Writer font as Calibri. About 90% still use it years later. The ones that don’t typically require Microsoft 365 for work.
Notepad2 is all I find myself using these days.
Notepad ? Why don’t you use Vi ? (well or Vim if necessary)
Notepad as nearly as terrible and unnecessarily feature-bloated as Emacs.
But if you are truly hardcore, you’d use ed or edlin and nothing else.
No, not Notepad, Notepad2, which is a completely different application. On top of that Notepad2 is a Windows only application, so mentioning Linux text editors like Vi(m), Emacs, ed and edlin does not really make sense.
In the past I didn’t like LibreIffice but after they improved a few things in 7.4 and 7.5 I actually like it and use it. Mostly Writer. In terms of features it is much better than any other software of this kind except MS Office. In terms of customization it seems the best. Guys who prefer minimalism may use OnlyOffice, but work is way more comfortable and productive in LibreOffice. As for questionable improvements, Libre gets them but as long as I can turn new features off I don’t really mind.
Comments are broken or something. Oldest is from February 22, 2021. :S
And the MAIN PROBLEM is that the software is not working, my intention was that I would download a video from a specific website and it worked, but when I tried to get another video, it stoppend to work and it is not working at all, Would you have any idea, what a mistake I am doing . Thanks