LibreOffice 6.2 with optional Tabbed Ribbon-like interface - gHacks Tech News

LibreOffice 6.2 with optional Tabbed Ribbon-like interface

LibreOffice 6.2, a new version of the popular open source Office suite, has been released in February 2019. The new version of the cross-platform program introduces lots of new features, among them the final version of the tabbed user interface that is comparable to the Ribbon user interface that Microsoft Office uses.

The developers of LibreOffice started the integration of the then-called Notebookbar with the release of LibreOffice 5.3 in 2017.

The user interface is not enabled by default; LibreOffice users who dislike the ribbon interface can ignore it and continue using the classic LibreOffice interface.

Tip: check out our review of the major version LibreOffice 6.0 here.

libreoffice 6.2 tabbed ui ribbon

Another user interface has been moved from experimental to final in LibreOffice 6.2 The Goupedbar Compact user interface is available for selection as well in the new version.

libreoffice groupedbar ui

Select View > User Interface to select one of the available interfaces in Writer, Calc, Impress, or Draw.

LibreOffice 6.2.0 is available as a direct download for all supported operating systems on the official project website. The download is offered as a web download and torrent download. It can be installed over an existing LibreOffice installation.

The new version introduces changes to Mac and Linux compatibility. The minimum required version of Mac OS X to run LibreOffice 6.2.0 is Mac Os X 10.9; the next release of LibreOffice will require Mac OS X 10.10.

The development team announced that 32-bit binaries for Linux will be demoted. LibreOffice 6.2.0 is the last version with x86 builds produced by The Document Foundation.

Check out the changelog on the official site for a full list of changes. Below is a selection of changes:

  • Writer: spreadsheet data can be copied and pasted natively in Writer (Word) now. The new functionality allows you to paste directly into tables (opposed to creating a new table whenever you paste spreadsheet data as was the case in previous versions).
  • Writer: documents with many tracked changes don't suffer from major performance issues anymore thanks to the ability to hide tracked changes.
  • Calc: Support for signature lines.
  • Calc: Support for custom formulas for data validation.
  • Calc: Regression tool supports multivariate regression analysis.
  • Calc: Regex support to match text against a regular expression and optionally replace.
  • Core: Sign signature lines with an image of your handwritten signature.
  • Core: Source Serif Pro font added and Liberation font updated.
  • Filters: EMF+ vector image import support improved (used in Microsoft Office formats)
  • Filters: OOXML, PPTX import/export, PPT import/export filter improvements.
  • Personalization: Personalization dialog is "much faster, efficient and stable".
  • Performance: improvements across the board, e.g. latency reduction, unnecessary animations have been removed.

Closing Words

LibreOffice 6.2 is a good upgrade to the popular Office application. The integration of new user interface layouts won't impact users who prefer to use the classic interface; those who like ribbon UIs can switch to the new interfaces easily using the View menu.

Now You: which Office application do you use, and why?

software image
Author Rating
5 based on 4 votes
Software Name
LibreOffice 6.2
Software Category
Landing Page

We need your help

Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.

We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.

If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:

Previous Post: «
Next Post: »


  1. ilev said on February 10, 2019 at 10:11 am

    Waiting for the portable version.

  2. anonC said on February 10, 2019 at 10:12 am

    “Mac OS X to run LibreOffice 6.2.0 is Mac Os X 10.9; the next release of LibreOffice will require LibreOffice 10.10”

    should read

    “macOS to run LibreOffice 6.2 is macOS 10.9; the next release of LibreOffice will require macOS 10.10”

    1. Martin Brinkmann said on February 10, 2019 at 10:32 am

      Thank You!

      1. CKing123 said on February 10, 2019 at 7:54 pm

        Even better would be that “LibreOffice 6.2 is the last version to support macOS 10.9 (Mavericks). Future releases require macOS 10.10 (Yosemite) or greater.”

      2. cripee said on February 11, 2019 at 11:42 am

        Nobody care about MacOS because nobody use it.

  3. pat said on February 10, 2019 at 12:42 pm

    Now You: which Office application do you use, and why?

    I chose onlyoffice, (snap version for linux), which I find better for .docx files and generally simpler for the little I ask for. Tabbed interface.

    1. MikeFromMarkham said on February 11, 2019 at 9:16 am

      I’d never heard of ONLYOFFICE until I saw your comment last night.

      I’ve since downloaded and installed the Desktop Editors on my Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 x64 computer, and have begun testing it. Apart from a little slowness in opening some documents (probably due to the age of the computer), I’m having no issues with compatibility with opening/reading/saving LibreOffice or Microsoft Office documents so far.

      I’ll be further testing it on a Windows 8.1 PRO x64 desktop, a Windows 10 Home x64 laptop, and a Linux Mint 19 x64 laptop in the next few days, but so far I’m very impressed with what I see, and am seriously thinking of making it my go to office suite.

      Thanks so much for the tip!

    2. JohnS said on February 11, 2019 at 11:08 am

      I use the onlyoffice snap too. I also use the WPS snap. Both snaps work very good and the good thing with snaps is that they don’t leave leftovers on my ubuntu system. I like them a lot.

    3. Pedro said on February 11, 2019 at 12:29 pm

      OnlyOffice is a really nice open-source office suite, however it’s much more barebones than LibreOffice.
      I would say it is more of a GDocs competitor.

    4. Peterc said on February 11, 2019 at 9:25 pm

      ONLYOFFICE doesn’t support keyboard layouts with dead keys (e.g., US International, Brazilian Portuguese), so if you use a dead-key layout, don’t bother. But it’s open-source, so if you use a *non*-dead-key layout and don’t need the fancier bells and whistles found in other office suites, go for it.

      1. Clairvaux said on February 12, 2019 at 8:56 am


        Are you positive about that ? Only Office is published by a Latvian company, a small country by any measure. It would be a major failing if they hadn’t designed their program to be adaptable to any language in the world.

      2. Peterc said on February 12, 2019 at 9:52 am

        I installed OnlyOffice around a week ago, in Windows, and gave it a spin. I couldn’t type apostrophes or quotation marks, because in the US International layout those are dead keys for the acute accent and the dieresis (umlaut), respectively. In any other program, I type apostrophe+spacebar and quotation-mark+spacebar and get an apostrophe and a quotation mark, but in OnlyOffice I got nothing.

        I also read a post from someone who uses the Brazilian Portuguese keyboard layout (which apparently has dead keys), and *he* complained that it didn’t work. Someone from OnlyOffice responded saying that this was a known, upstream problem with a Chromium component that OnlyOffice uses.

        Anyway, regardless of where the problem lies, it makes OnlyOffice unusable for me, so I uninstalled it.

  4. George said on February 10, 2019 at 12:45 pm

    In the case of LibreOffice, I think the “Enterprise” version (currently 6.1.5) is usually preferable to use for stability reasons:

  5. Jody Thornton said on February 10, 2019 at 8:20 pm

    So I take it LiberOffice stems from OpenOffice. The latter used to be Gawd-Awful slow (especially since it required Java). Is that still the case? Is there another reason to use either OpenOffice vs LibreOffice?

    1. Anonymous said on February 11, 2019 at 4:00 am

      LiberOffice was forked from OpenOffice long time ago. Is there any reason why you hate Java? It’s much better than those Electron apps

      1. Jody Thornton said on February 11, 2019 at 1:28 pm


        Insecure, and I find Java applets runs slow. I’ve never needed it in the last decade.
        Besides, why support another dead technology. It would be like singing up for Yahoo! Groups.

      2. John Fenderson said on February 11, 2019 at 5:07 pm

        @Anonymous: “It’s much better than those Electron apps”

        Talk about damning with faint praise!

    2. Apparition said on February 11, 2019 at 4:23 am

      Développement on stopped a couple of years ago. LibreOffice essentially replaced it. Java is only required if you use the database. I don’t have Java installed and have been using LibreOffice just fine for years.

      1. Pedro said on February 11, 2019 at 10:50 am

        Even for the database is not required since they migrated to Firebird.

      2. Chris said on February 12, 2019 at 4:25 am

        “Apparition” is mistaken. is still under active development. As a matter of fact, they just recently issued a new release.

    3. Peterc said on February 11, 2019 at 8:20 pm

      @Judy Thornton:

      When I used OpenOffice in PCLinuxOS 11 or 12 years ago, I wasn’t very happy with how unrefined it was compared to MS Office. (Maybe not “Gawd Awful,” but definitely not “Gawd DAYum, this is good!”) I seem to recall that LibreOffice forked off after Oracle acquired OpenOffice from Sun and at some point later on looked set to reduce or pull support for it. (I think maybe Oracle fired a bunch of OpenOffice developers and maintainers or something, but I just don’t remember the details.) Regardless, LibreOffice has been *very* actively developed since then and (in my opinion) has improved dramatically.

      I don’t use Base or pay much attention to news about it, but to my knowledge LibreOffice Base still requires Java for certain features. However, there is an active project underway to migrate completely away from Java:


      When will the next version no longer use Java? – Ask LibreOffice

      “Current version does not require Java to use most of [its] functions. Only some masters, non-linear solvers, and embedded database in Base requires Java (so, Base is actually usable without Java, too; just not its masters and embedded mode).

      “Currently, a tender by [The Document Foundation] is ~finished to create a conversion module from HSQLDB to Firebird (which is the new, Java-free, component used to embed DB in Base) – currently conversion is being polished, to allow removal of HSQL completely.”


      [HSQLDB runs in Java and Firebird runs in C++.] But again, I don’t pay close attention to news about Base, and it’s possible that Pedro is correct and that the very most recent versions of Base don’t require Java for *anything*. (I just didn’t find anything that explicitly said so in a quick Google search.)

  6. Q said on February 10, 2019 at 8:58 pm

    LibreOffice programs look and may work nice once using them, but they seem terribly inefficient in terms of resource use.

    On a computer running Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 3:
    –Microsoft Word 2000 with SP3 takes about a second to start and uses about 25 MB running.
    –LibreOffice Writer takes about 10 seconds to start and uses about 211 to 306 MB running.

    1. Jody Thornton said on February 11, 2019 at 12:02 am

      Hey Q:

      Hmmmmm ….. Me thinks I’ll stick with Softmaker Office.

      1. Q said on February 11, 2019 at 2:43 am

        Hello Jody,

        I had not seen you post above, prior to myself posting.

        If I remember correctly had an increasing dependency on Java. LibreOffice also has functionality that relies on Java, but it can be used fine without Java.

        I have LibreOffice installed myself as a backup office suite to handle something should Microsoft Office 2000 be unable to. I rarely have to use it. I do not have Java installed.

        I have not used more recent versions of the SoftMaker Office suites, but the older ones did run well and were usable. It, however, did not focus on imitation of UI and functionality of Microsoft Office; it was not a Microsoft Office clone. It had its own way of implementing things. The SoftMaker Office start time for a program is quick and the resource management is rather decent (at least this was the case for SoftMaker Office 2008).

    2. evidentalism said on February 11, 2019 at 2:20 am

      That brings back the day. Win 95 running Office 2000. 64 mb hard drive. Floppy disk. Pin connectors. Hard to believe ain’t it.

    3. Apparition said on February 11, 2019 at 4:25 am

      Why are you still using Windows XP and Microsoft Office 2000 in 2019? You are just opening yourself up to a whole host of security issues.

      1. ShintoPlasm said on February 11, 2019 at 8:21 am

        I guess for similar reasons to people still using Opera 12…?

    4. Pedro said on February 11, 2019 at 10:52 am

      LibreOffice does not support Windows XP. Windows XP is an unsupported OS even by Microsoft.
      Why should they worry about performance on it?
      Consider using modern software please.

      1. SpywareFan said on February 11, 2019 at 3:47 pm

        I see the same performance difference between Libre and Office 2003 installed on a W7Pro I7-6700 machine, on the same machine only Office 2016 is slow like Libre (maybe because of blocked telemetry?).
        Maybe the day that Libre will be able to run some complex macros I will accept its slowness and dump the M$ spyware, overall Libre is a good SW for those without special needs.

      2. Clairvaux said on February 11, 2019 at 6:03 pm

        One of the remarkable qualities of old Microsoft Office (2003 here) is indeed its launch speed. You’d think it never closes. I guess they knew how to write tight code in those days, and Microsoft took advantage of its ability to deeply integrate Office into Windows.

  7. chesscanoe said on February 10, 2019 at 9:45 pm

    I chose to upgrade from LO to to take advantage of its stability and feature set which is all I need as a limited user of the fine product.
    Running under Windows Home x64 [Version 10.0.17763.292]

  8. OldNavyGuy said on February 11, 2019 at 1:17 am

    There are two branches…

    6.2 – Fresh

    6.15 – Still

  9. ilev said on February 11, 2019 at 11:12 am

    This is Fresh Branch version aka beta.

  10. Mark Hazard said on February 11, 2019 at 3:10 pm

    People should hold off converting their data to Firebird format. I was one of the first to convert when version 6 of LibreOffice appeared. The conversion mangled my data so badly that I couldn’t upload it to the bug fixers when I reported the error. Being trusting, and stupid, I failed to make a backup of the data, so I had to manually recreate the data from printed records in the old format( the data wasn’t critical).

    Today I received a email from a user reporting in Bugzilla reporting that Firebird was still corrupting numeric data, so I will hold off converting, and upgrading to LibreOffice 6.2, where I believe that Firebird conversion is mandatory. I do have data backups now.

  11. Clairvaux said on February 11, 2019 at 5:56 pm

    Does anyone know whether this last version of Libre Office is (at last) fully high DPI aware ? Icons included ? I’m referring to this :

    This developer designed a special set of icons, which is less bad than the embedded alternatives, but it’s still not great. He explains the problem.

    I don’t understand how such an old piece of software, which has so many users, developers and fans, it still stuck with those horrible, childish and ugly sets of icons. Especially when it’s installed on configurations which are sensitive to high DPI issues, where they don’t render well at all.

    I want my software to be beautiful. At the very least, not ugly. Ugliness is a deal-breaker. It hinders usability.

    This developer has also some criticism of the original icon system :

    Here is an interesting comparison of OOXML (Microsoft) and ODF (Libre Office) formats, by Only Office :

    1. Pedro said on February 11, 2019 at 6:59 pm

      That developer made an svg version of the Breeze icon theme. That’s why there’s that issue with High DPI systems.
      In 6.2 there’s already experimental svg support and icon sets, but it still needs work.

      1. Clairvaux said on February 11, 2019 at 8:02 pm

        You mean he developed that because there was that high DPI issue, not the other way round ?

    2. John Fenderson said on February 11, 2019 at 8:54 pm

      @Clairvaux: “I don’t understand how such an old piece of software, which has so many users, developers and fans, it still stuck with those horrible, childish and ugly sets of icons”

      I’ve never noticed any problems with the icons at all, personally.

      1. Clairvaux said on February 12, 2019 at 8:09 am

        @ John Fenderson

        I’ve prepared a little interface comparative for you.

        Note that this is specific to how those programs display on my configuration. This might be different on other people’s.

        I am on Windows 7 64-bit, with a 24″ 1920 x 1200 monitor, and (that’s the tricky part), in Control/Display/Set Custom Size DPI, Display is set at 150 % and XP-Style DPI Scaling is set at Yes.

        I need this, because of my failing eyesight, and how different programs I use a lot react to those settings.

        However, this combination makes my PC react as if it were high DPI (which it’s not), therefore programs which are not perfectly high DPI-aware (and there are many, big and small) don’t display perfectly.

        Sometimes it’s a minor difference from normal, sometimes it makes the program completely unusable.

        Libre Office is not fully high DPI-aware, it’s a known problem, and it shows in the interface and icons.

        This is added to the fact that the different icon sets for Libre Office are bad, irrespective of that high DPI problem.

        The proof they are bad is there are several sets from which you can choose, embedded in the program. This is almost always a sure sign that the graphic designer(s) is (are) bad, so they throw several options at you in order to hide that.

        Of course, all of them are bad. If you’re bad at designing icons, then throwing one more set at the wall won’t make it stick.

        Note how several of these sets look almost the same. That’s a classic defect of such software offering those false choices of “styles” or “templates”.

        The Tango (default), Elementary and Galaxy sets are almost the same. The graphic designer couldn’t make his mind, so he “gave power to the people” and made users do his job in his place. Such moves are always the sign of a bad worker.

        Those sets are childish, too colourful, tacky, not elegant, and they have a crushed and blurry aspect to them that probably comes from non high DPI awareness.

        In a similar vein, Sifr and Breeze are almost the same : almost no colours, black, sinister, with nothing to catch the eye in order to separate the features and swiftly direct the mind to the one that’s needed.

        The one I have installed right now it Breeze HiDPI Winaero. It’s that special hacked, third-party set of icons I linked to before. The developer tried to address the non-scalable quality that comes from not being high DPI aware.

        That’s the best combination I could find for my PC, however you can see it’s far from perfect. The size is not right, the icons are too big and there’s not enough white space to separate them.

        I’ve added the menu and toolbars of two other programs to show you what a good interface looks like.

        The first one is Text Maker from the Soft Maker Office suite, with the Classic UI option. I regret the light blue background, I think it would be better with a light grey, but still, this is much more efficient and professional that the Libre Office interface.

        From a graphic standpoint, I prefer the Ribbon interface option of Soft Maker Office, but I did not want to compare apples and oranges, so I displayed the Classic UI.

        And finally we have PDF X-Change Editor with the Classic UI (there’s also a Ribbon UI you can change into, without even relaunching the software). That’s one of the best menu / toolbar / icon / interface jobs I’ve seen lately.

        Note that neither Soft Maker Office nor PDF X-Change give you a “choice” of “styles” or “templates”. They took their responsibility and did their job. They tried to deliver the best, and the best has no options, of course. Because anything else would be worse.

        The choices they can and do offer are justified : ribbon interface or classic interface is a fundamentally different way to work, different people have different preferences in that regard, so it’s good to be able to choose between them.

        Soft Maker Office and PDF X-Change also give you the choice between “Mouse” and “Touch” interface. Also justified, because those are two different ways of interacting with the screen. I’ve also found that the Touch option can be useful to use with the mouse, when like me, you need slightly larger interface items to be really comfortable.

        Soft Maker Office has a choice between a light theme and a dark theme, and there again, that’s a fundamental choice which is justified. Some people really, really want (and need) dark screens, for the sake of their eyes.

        And finally, Soft Maker Office and PDF X-Change toolbars (just as in Libre Office) can be completely customised by the user, taking away some icons, adding some, grouping them differently, and that’s a major advantage for power users, because each one of them has different needs.

        Note how Soft Maker Office and PDF X-Change Editor are paid-for programs, developed by big, bad capitalist companies, which are out to make a profit (despite the fact they offer free versions of their programs, which are very generous feature-wise).

        Libre Office is open source and free and leftist and caring and politically correct as hell, and, as a result, it’s bad.

        In that respect. I don’t mean obviously it’s a complete steaming pile of horseshit, useless to anybody. I’m just saying this leftist mindset often produces such results, as is exemplified by Firefox and do-gooder Mozilla.

      2. Pedro said on February 12, 2019 at 10:50 am

        Clairvaux, there’s work being done to improve svg support so that LO can better support High DPI resolutions and also Light/Dark themes. This may take 6 months to 1 year depending on the work load.

        You really don’t know what the fuck you are saying though, since Tango and Galaxy were discontinued and are not present in LO since version 6.1.

        The designers working on those icons do know what they want, and the reasoning to have multiple icon sets is to make LO look at home in the different OS/DEs that it is used on. This is because LO offers freedom of choice.
        You have the following icon sets that are being actively developed each for its specific reason:

        Breeze – this icon set was developed by designers that belonged to the Visual Design Group of Plasma/KDE. It’s the default icon theme for Plasma DE and MacOS (however this will change).

        Elementary – this icon set was first developed by Elementary OS designers. It’s been further improved and superseded Tango. Currently it is the default icon set for Gnome DEs.

        Colibre – This icon set was developed by the LO designers to make LO look native in Windows 8/10 following the Metro guidelines and drawing inspiration from Microsoft Office icons. Default in Windows.

        Karasa Jaga – this was an icon set that one of the new designers worked on based on the old Oxygen icon set. It is a very polished and complete icon set even if it might look a bit outdated. Hence why it was included in LO, even if it’s not the default in any OS.

        Sifr – The high contrast theme was discontinued. Sifr is the new high contrast theme. It is now receiving many improvements for 6.3.

        For 6.3 there will be a new icon set named Sukapura to make LO look native in MacOS. It uses the Mac color palette and is an adaptation from Colibre.

        LO has releases every 6 months. It’s no released “when it’s ready”. This means that it will always feel like a Beta in some aspects. It’s still a useful tool to have.

      3. Clairvaux said on February 12, 2019 at 11:39 am

        @ Pedro

        That’s a nice illustration of my point : libre software has a tendency to attract uncouth individuals, whose lofty, alleged ideals serve mainly to hide their anti-social and sectarian nature. To wit :

        “You really don’t know what the fuck you are saying though, since Tango and Galaxy were discontinued and are not present in LO since version 6.1.”

        I really know what THE FUCK I’m saying, and I’v just proven it to you. You don’t even try to address the problems I exposed.

        I don’t care that Tango or Galaxy were discontinued or not one second ago. I don’t spend my life feeding my computer and updating Libre Office. I’ve just shown you that Tango, Galaxy (and the others that you didn’t mention, because supposedly they are still there), are shit.

        And I explained why they are shit. I seriously doubt this shitness has suddenly gone away from Libre Office. Even Libre Office fanatics, which I linked to, recognise and regret that shitness.

        You don’t even begin to debate the argument. You say :

        “The designers working on those icons do know what they want.”

        Well, that’s the problem. What is important is not what they want. What is important is what I want. That’s a weird concept you’ve apparently never heard about : the customer.

        That concept usually takes form when people are forced to rely on customers to pay their bills. That’s what separates free from for-profit. I’m not saying open source and free is never good — it often is. It just has a knack to attract unpleasant, self-centered individuals with an attitude.

        You say :

        “The reasoning to have multiple icon sets is to make LO look at home in the different OS/DEs that it is used on.”

        Well, yes. That’s the reasoning. But there’s reasoning, and there are facts. I’ve just shown to you that to this Windows user, Libre Office does not look at home at all. Windows 7 is not a small operating system.

        When facts disprove reasoning, sane people change their reasoning. Sectarians stick to their reasoning and pretend that theory has precedence over facts.

        Then you go on name-dropping about development bureaucracy details only nerds care about. Nobody cares if icon set X was first developed by Elementary OS designers.

        Several icon sets you mention are not even included in my version of Libre Office, and it’s quite a current one. It’s probably n – 1.

        If icon sets are designed to be OS-specific, then why is a choice even offered ? That’s my whole point. It’s a false choice. Soft Maker Office and PDF X-Change Editor, which don’t offer that “choice”, have much better interfaces. As I have shown.

        But you don’t even care to discuss competing software. Nothing exists apart from Libre Office. That’s the mindset that’s so deplorable in some sections of the open source movement.

      4. Peterc said on February 12, 2019 at 9:11 pm


        I appreciate well-designed icons, too, but the only things I really *require* of them is that they be readily identifiable, readily distinguishable, and not unduly distracting. And while I have never looked at LibreOffice’s toolbar-icon sets and thought to myself, “Damn! Them are some *good-lookin’* icons!”, I’ve never had a problem with them, either (even though I scale *my* display up because of *my* poor eyesight). I occasionally cycle through LibreOffice’s toolbar-icon sets to see which one I like best, but that’s the extent of my preoccupation with them. I look forward to future improvements, but I’m not losing sleep over the fact that they’re not here yet.

        I care a lot more about functionality. I use LibreOffice Writer and Calc and I *like* them, but I find the Macro Recorder (still an “experimental” feature) woefully inadequate. I frequently can’t get even straightforward sequences of commands to run properly without first manually editing the recorded macro — which is a challenge for someone who knows absolutely nothing about UNO, LibreOffice Basic, or coding in general.

        I used to bitch about how Writer’s character spacing was *horrendously* amateurish. I’ve since learned that recent versions of Writer have professional-typesetting-class character spacing … but that it requires modern hardware support that my computers don’t have. (Maybe it’s limited to certain classes of fonts, too. I don’t remember.) I guess I’ll find out when I get a fancy new computer someday.

        Finally, it’s unfortunate that you inject personal ideological inferences into your opinion of open-source software and its advocates. All sorts of people use, develop, and contribute to open-source projects, including the US Army, the US Navy, the French Gendarmerie nationale, the French Parliament … and the hard-nosed, very-much-for-profit American tech company my brother works at. Plenty of “right-wing, free-market types” use open-source software simply because they don’t want to be at the mercy of one proprietary-software vendor’s future whims and dictates. At any rate, being left-wing, right-wing, pro-gay-marriage, anti-gay-marriage, politically correct, politically incorrect, or whatnot just doesn’t have a whole lot to do with how *good* a software package is and what the pros and cons of using it are. In conclusion, “Workers of the world, unite!” (Just yanking your chain! ;-)

      5. Clairvaux said on February 13, 2019 at 4:36 am

        @ Peterc

        I have a similar question for you : do those Libre Office icons look that way on your computer ?

        As for the political side of it :

        “It’s unfortunate that you inject personal ideological inferences into your opinion of open-source software and its advocates.”

        Why ? Injecting personal inferences into a discussion is called freedom of thought and expression. Economics and politics is a major part of our lives, and they have great influence over our well-being.

        The tech products and services we’re discussing in this blog would never have seen the light of day if the economy and politics of their place of birth had not been arranged in a certain way. Indeed, you can notice that such products and services never see the light of day in some countries whose economics and politics are arranged differently.

        What you’re pulling there is a typical left-wing stunt : one is not allowed to make political statements unless they are left-wing. It’s fine and dandy if you say open-source software is saintly and godly because of all its marvelous left-wing qualities (who wants to be “closed” ? who doesn’t like “free” ?). That’s not being political. It’s just being neutral and fair and truthful.

        Just show that some of the open-source apologists say one thing and practice another, just show that their purported love of freedom and humanity is sometimes the very opposite, just bring some facts to the table that prove that some ingrained defects of open source software stem right from the vicious left-wing mindset of their apologists, and bingo ! You “inject personal ideological inferences into your opinion of open-source software and its advocates”.

        Because of course, that’s something that open-source advocates never do.

        The quasi-religious fervor with which they talk of “libre software” (and bark at you if you beg to differ) bears no hint of ideology. Richard Stallman is just a hard-nosed engineer.

      6. Peterc said on February 13, 2019 at 7:27 am


        No, my LibreOffice toolbars don’t look the same as yours. I’m running LibreOffice 6.2. I applied the presupplied “sand” theme (which provides a beige/tan background color for the menubar, toolbars, searchbar, and statusbar) because it’s easy on the eyes and makes the difference between the GUI and the document a little clearer. I changed the icon “style” from the default “Automatic (Colibre)” to Sifr because Sifr is a little heavier-weight and easier for me to see. (And even though Sifr isn’t offered in an SVG version, unlike several other icon sets that *are*, I can’t say that it’s blurry. But 125% is as high as I can scale on my relatively lo-res laptop. Maybe the Sifr icons would get blurry at 150%. I don’t know.) The meaning of the great majority of icons in Sifr is obvious to me at a glance, and the tiny handful that are unclear to me have tooltips (like all of the other icons). If I started to use them regularly, I’m sure I’d remember what they do just by looking at them. To be honest, though, I think most of the icon sets would work for me except for the ones intended for “dark” themes, which largely disappear on light backgrounds like “sand.” Finally, I’ve customized my toolbars quite a bit, removing default icons I never use and adding custom entries for 18 special-purpose macros I *frequently* use. So in short, my LibreOffice looks different from yours.

        As for the politics, if you were a radical Maoist-Leninist with a bug up your ass about the “vicious right-wing mindset” of proprietary-software apologists, I’d tell you the same thing: this isn’t the venue for venting about it. Of course politics affects tech to a considerable degree, and it necessarily comes into play to some degree here, but this is primarily a *tech* blog, where people come to learn about and discuss software, not to be harangued or insulted about their political ideology. If you want to vigorously debate tech politics, maybe a site like TechDirt or certain subreddits would be more up your alley.

      7. John Fenderson said on February 12, 2019 at 6:54 pm


        OK, side-by-side like that, I can see the difference. I guess that it’s just not something that would bother me, so I’m less likely to notice it in isolation.

      8. Clairvaux said on February 13, 2019 at 4:12 am

        @ John Fenderson

        I’d be very interested to know : is that how Libre Office looks on your computer ? Or is it specific to my configuration ?

      9. John Fenderson said on February 13, 2019 at 6:43 pm

        It is not how it looks on either my Linux machines (under KDE) or on my Windows 10 machine at work. On both of those, the icons are high quality for me.

      10. Clairvaux said on February 14, 2019 at 1:03 pm

        That’s what I thought. Thanks for the info.

      11. Clairvaux said on February 14, 2019 at 1:17 pm

        @ Peterc

        Thank you for the info on icons. That’s the primary reason why I don’t use Libre Office.

        Regarding politics, I don’t insult anyone. On the other hand, I have been insulted quite a bit by leftists here.

        The reason I write here, apart from learning and sharing about tech tools, is expressing what I think are relevant observations regarding this domain of interest. Politics and economics are very much relevant to tech. So establishing an artificial barrier over that, which would often be bypassed anyway because of the double standards of the left, is not conducive to the betterment of ideas and intelligence.

        I will respectfully submit to you that it is not for you to state what is and what is not out of bounds here. That’s for the blog author to do. For the time being, there’s no ban on discussing politics. Therefore, it’s a permitted subject.

        If Martin changes his mind, then I will reconsider. There are plenty of tech blog/forums where politics are explicitely forbidden. That’s the reason I left Ask Woody, the real reason being the double standards enforced over the ban. As is so often the case.

  12. wf4 said on February 12, 2019 at 9:43 am

    weirdly, it needed me to kill some vmware/virtualbox usb thing (or reboot) during installation.. .so it’s not just a ms office thing.

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.