YouTube Container for Firefox isolates YouTube in the browser - gHacks Tech News

YouTube Container for Firefox isolates YouTube in the browser

YouTube Container is a free extension for the Firefox web browser that isolates YouTube domains that you open in the web browser from the rest to improve privacy.

The extension is a fork of Facebook Containers, an official extension for Firefox by Mozilla that isolates Facebook from the rest of the browsing activity to improve user privacy and limit tracking.

Note: Just like Facebook Containers, YouTube Containers requests access to data for all websites even though it appears to be active only on select YouTube domains.

Firefox's container functionality is a relatively new feature of the browser. Containers isolate sites loaded in the container from the rest of the browser. Isolate means that Firefox separates storage for cookies, temporary Internet files and other data; this improves privacy as it limits tracking capabilities. Another benefit is that you can open a site multiple times in the browser and sign in using different accounts.

Youtube Container is a fork from facebook container that isolates your Youtube activity from the rest of your web activity in order to prevent Youtube from tracking you outside of the Youtube website via third party cookies.

YouTube Container

youtube container

YouTube Container loads youtube.com domains in a separate container. The container is started when you load YouTube for the first time or click on a link that leads to YouTube.

Firefox highlights the use of a container in the address bar and by underlining the tab.

The container isolates YouTube cookies and other data from the rest of the browser to limit tracking. Note that the container is used only when YouTube is opened directly in the web browser but not if YouTube content is embedded on third-party sites.

In other words, any YouTube video that is embedded on a third-party site is not loaded in the container.

Closing Words

I predict that we will see more specialized container extensions that keep a specific site isolated from the rest of the browser. This could get out of hand quickly considering that you'd like to isolate other sites, e.g. Google, Microsoft, Twitter, as well.

The Temporary Containers extension for Firefox may be an option for some as it can be used to assign URLs to the same or different containers. It is not an install and forget about it type of extension though as it requires manual configuration.

If you are particularly worried about YouTube (Google) tracking you, YouTube Containers may be an extension that you could use to limit that tracking.

Now You: How do you deal with tracking on the Internet?

Summary
software image
Author Rating
1star1star1stargraygray
3 based on 4 votes
Software Name
YouTube Container
Software Category
Browser
Landing Page

We need your help

Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.

We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.

If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:

Comments

  1. Grimauld said on April 11, 2018 at 10:26 am
    Reply

    Or you just use Temporary Containers what does this for ALL websites.
    You can configure it to open a new container for even subdomains (maps.google.com / google.com)
    and of course that it deletes every data after closing the last tab.

    This should be default for private browsing mode in Firefox

  2. Tom Hawack said on April 11, 2018 at 10:28 am
    Reply

    Facebook containers, now YouTube Container not to mention other domain-specific containers, some of which already available if I’m not mistaking. The trend is a container for each and every domain known to privacy invasive : the game has started and as it goes is not over.

    Why not forget containers and simply apply Firefox’s First Party Isolation? Even safer and far less cumbersome.

    1. Sophie said on April 11, 2018 at 12:06 pm
      Reply

      @Tom – you’re very right that the game has only just started. What is great – is that even if FB continues to swell in numbers, and the FB storm blows over, what is really great is that at last….privacy, and the importance of it, is at last on the agenda. Those that don’t care at all, still won’t care, but those that are curious, have been hopefully helped to learn a bit more about how their information is used.

      What was also disappointing, having watched a lot of it, was FB’s Zuckerberg questioning session yesterday….. the disappointment was not so much him (answers=to be expected), but the very poor quality of the people scrutinizing him.

      And Tom………. instead of containers, how about a VM? I swear by mine, and you barely need to containerize anything, once you have a VM.

      Enough talk about Zuck…..now where’s that glass of lovely French wine! I need a break from all this stuff!!

      1. Tom Hawack said on April 11, 2018 at 2:25 pm
        Reply

        @Sophie, I had replied to your comment when I had received it via email notification though not yet published here, and now I see your above comment but my answer isn’t available …

        Time, time, time is on my side! Only time, space less!

  3. Sebas said on April 11, 2018 at 11:51 am
    Reply

    Google Chrome multiple accounts, set up with a normal account and one account for all websites on which I log in. Works more intuitively for me although I suppose you cannot compare it one on one. Probably temporary solution while waiting on Brave 1.0. https://brave.com/development-plans-for-upcoming-release/

    Adguard for desktop, sometimes enabling stealth mode for sites as Youtube and the like.

  4. Tom Hawack said on April 11, 2018 at 2:11 pm
    Reply

    @Sophie, (I’ve received e-mail notification of your post but your comment isn’t yet published here) :

    When I mentioned the game I meant that of site-specific container extensions’ inflation, but your development on the raising awareness of privacy issues is far more interesting.

    I haven’t streamed Zuckerberg’s questioning sessions, only read articles and extracts of his highly formatted answers and less formatted — unless it be the result of the courses of humility he had been briefed with before — embarrassments. My belief — really: my supposition — is that the true sorrow is of having been caught rather than having caught users with illusions.

    What will be the impact, on Facebook’s future, on users’ awareness of privacy, social websites and FB in particular, I have no idea. Stock markets as always react hysterically and are relevant of nothing else than the subtle blend of fear and eagerness, those of wallets and nothing but wallets of course. Users? What proportion of 2 billion will have received the message 5/5 and will today, tomorrow or after-tomorrow close their FB account? Small, I’m afraid. Addiction is when thrill beats it all.

    > “Enough talk about Zuck…..now where’s that glass of lovely French wine! I need a break from all this stuff!!”

    Now that’s a delightful resolution! I’d love to share with you a bottle of ‘Château Lafite’ or a barrel (!) with us all here, accompanied with delicious, little “amuse-gueule” but that would be far too virtual to honor a good wine : hey! if it all works by the brains a first sensual touch is imperative!

    Speaking of virtual, you mention, Sophie, the VM approach as a solution for much of privacy issues. I’ve never deployed a VM for a very idiotic reason: I’m not fond of the concept of virtual. Stupid reason I guess and relevant of irrational choices sometimes. I have VM in mind for some time now, I may get on it seriously… one day or another (once the bottle emptied would mean soon so forget that reference!)

    Beat goes on.

    1. Sophie said on April 11, 2018 at 5:27 pm
      Reply

      @Tom – I enjoyed to read you! I will always read at least twice, looking for subtleties of language, and to check my self that I understood the first time. Thank you!

      I really do believe that privacy awareness has been done a big favour by the recent FB “scandal”. And I do fear that with such a vast user-base, the best we can hope for is not the end of FB, but at last….the realisation that abuses of privacy have been carried out, even if that was ‘always part of the deal’.

      I read the comments section in a UK newspaper (who’s title I am rather embarrassed to admit to), and there are indeed a lot of angry people on there, angry about FB, that is. Many, many of them are saying they are going to delete their accounts, or that they have done already…..but you are right, the pervasive nature of the medium, and the ‘addictive’ part will likely have them running back soon, when their friends might reject them. So little will change, which is why privacy-awareness is the best we can hope.

      I’ll always remember going to the local French markets and the “cooperative”, getting wine with moules, or other lovely delicacies. Nyons has a lovely market, and the handmade soaps are heaven! But who on Ghacks wishes to read that? Apologies therefore, to all you out there!! I could elaborate, but I don’t think its fair to a technical forum!

      And with the VM, Oracle VirtualBox has been faultless for me….both in its’ use, and in its implementation. It makes Windows System Restore look like a very “poor” alternative to the rolling-back side of things.

      It’s also free, and nothing to lose but a bit of time….and hard drive space.

      But then again, you did say, further up the page [Time, time, time is on my side! Only time, space less!]

      So if time really is on your side……..give it a go! And do not worry about “concepts”, these are fabrications of the mind, that need to be broken down and re-evaluated, just in case they are found to have been false all alone.

      And the beat goes on? That’s a great song! Nice to read you Tom.

      1. Sebas said on April 12, 2018 at 3:13 am
        Reply

        Well I or for one like your praise for France. Got there so many times and it is a magic country. A personality among the countries. OK since this is ghacks: they make a nice search engine: Qwant, especially Qwant lite, without javascript applied: https://lite.qwant.com/

      2. Sophie said on April 12, 2018 at 10:29 am
        Reply

        @Sebas – thanks for that!

        I just wanted to say, coming back to the Facebook issue, that one thing really stuck out just yesterday….and I quote:

        Questioner to Zuck: “Are you willing to change your business model?” (in respect to the advertising and spying and data collection) [my words in brackets]

        Zuck: “I’m not sure what that means…”

        I mean, really!!!! Zuck totally gets the question, and I cannot believe he was given such an easy ride, by the questioner immediately moving along.

        Let’s hope some decent people pin him down soon, very soon.

  5. TelV said on April 12, 2018 at 2:19 pm
    Reply

    Interesting article this morning on the Dutch NOS news site concerning Facebook trackers used by medical insurance companies to send (sensitive) user data to Facebook servers. Here’s the link to Google Translate for the English language version: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fnos.nl%2Fartikel%2F2226957-menzis-en-onvz-gebruiken-tracking-pixel-van-facebook-niet-meer.html&edit-text=&act=url

    Here’s the original Dutch link: https://nos.nl/artikel/2226957-menzis-en-onvz-gebruiken-tracking-pixel-van-facebook-niet-meer.html

    They also mention other news organisations doing the same thing.

  6. Mo said on April 13, 2018 at 3:33 pm
    Reply

    We need an Amazon container as well!

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.