Gaze Tracking System is a creepy Google (Glass) patent

Martin Brinkmann
Aug 19, 2013
Updated • Aug 19, 2013
Google
|
10

If you do not have to pay for a service, it is usually your information that are used to create revenue for that service. Nowadays, even paid services or devices may come with advertisement. Microsoft's Xbox One will ship with dashboard ads, and it is likely that Google Glass will too.

I never really understood the craze about Google Glass in first place, but that is probably just me and a handful of others. If you look at early reviews, most reviewers like Google Glass. That is fueled by Google's excellent marketing division that is marketing Glass as the next big thing that you need to have, to be cool, or whatever.

Google Glass is a paid product that is not available yet. It is not clear how expensive it will be, but it is very likely that it will cost several hundred Dollars at the very least.

Google, depending mostly on advertising for revenue, has been granted a new patent that could find its way into Google Glass.

glass patent images

The Gaze Tracking System patent describes a technology implemented in head mounted devices, such as Google Glass, that is communicating with a (Google) server. The server receives captured images from the device that the user is viewing and also the gaze direction and other related information. This indicates what the user was looking at and how excited he was at that time. The server runs an image identification algorithm to identify items in that image and creates a log tracking those identified items.

Google basically knows what you are looking at when you are using a device that is using the Gaze tracking system, when you looked at it, where, for how long, and if you reacted emotionally to it.

The patent does not mention Google Glass in particular, but that is likely because it was filed back in May 2011, a time where the final name may not have been picked yet.

Part of the patent refers to tracking advertisement views by the user's gaze. It is interesting to note that this includes real-world ads a user may see on billboards for example, and not only virtual ads that are displayed next to contents downloaded from the Internet.

Advertisers may be charged if the user looks at the ad and the price may differ depending on how long users do so. Google may also sell the information it collects to advertisers as analytical data, including emotional responses it generated based on the pupil dilation.

Note that it is not clear if the technology described in the patent will land in Google Glass, or any other Google product for the matter.

Closing Words

It will be interesting to see if the technology lands in Google Glass. If it does, it is just another confirmation for me that Glass is not worth it, and that you will give up a lot of privacy when you are using it.

What's your take on the patent and technology it describes? (via Marketingland)

Advertisement

Tutorials & Tips


Previous Post: «
Next Post: «

Comments

  1. Ken Saunders said on August 19, 2013 at 8:25 pm
    Reply

    I’m ready for portable, mini EMP devices to combat all of this creepy crap.

  2. imu said on August 19, 2013 at 5:46 pm
    Reply

    WOW! I have 5 min to edit my post…thats new..well done Martin :)

  3. imu said on August 19, 2013 at 5:44 pm
    Reply

    There will be need for Anti-Glass to make google failed in recognizing and identifying me.

  4. Wayfarer said on August 19, 2013 at 5:37 pm
    Reply

    I don’t think the social and/or legal ramifications of this device have been even partially considered yet. The technology is already banned in principle in some countries. Quite apart from paranoid police and security services who already get their knickers in a twist over simple phone cams, I can certainly see local UK police forces treating this device as “likely to cause a breach of the peace.”

    Which it certainly will in spades – as with another poster, anyone pointing their googles glasses into my business will be risking having both the glasses broken and the bridge of the nose they rest upon.

    That said, I suspect within a few years they may become far too ubiquitous for anyone to do much about. Other perhaps than Prism/whatever who by then may have a backdoor (or at least the legal authority to confiscate and check), making unwitting surveillance tools of anyone without enough sense to see the danger of this ‘cool’ technology.

  5. anon said on August 19, 2013 at 3:42 pm
    Reply

    I wonder if I can sue anyone who look at me with google glass on…

  6. Nebulus said on August 19, 2013 at 11:40 am
    Reply

    Why would someone want to wear Google Glass is beyond me… It serves to no other purpose than to spy on others, and as a bonus, it sends data about it to Google as well.

  7. Dude said on August 19, 2013 at 9:50 am
    Reply

    I predict a lots of geeks with broken glasses and noses. When someone stares at you with those it is the same as if someone points the camera directly at you… so….

  8. Tanya said on August 19, 2013 at 9:12 am
    Reply
  9. Luc Schots said on August 19, 2013 at 8:46 am
    Reply

    Why am I thinking ‘Minority Report’, I wonder?

  10. Daniel @warmth Delgado said on August 19, 2013 at 7:54 am
    Reply

    “This indicates what the user was looking at and how EXCITED he was at that time.” #Typo

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

We love comments and welcome thoughtful and civilized discussion. Rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please stay on-topic.
Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.