Google has redesigned the Google Play store and launched the new version yesterday to the public. Unlike in the past, where the shift happened gradually and not all at once, this time all users from all over the world got the new interface at the same time.
Some users may notice that the store is loading faster for them, while others may not notice a difference at all.
The core reason for this is that Google switched from using the png image format to the company's own WebP. The format provides lossless and lossy compression for web images, and in this particular case, the lossy variant is used.
The big issue here is that WebP is not supported by all browsers. While it is supported by Chrome and Opera, and Android 4.0 and up, it is not supported by Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer and other web browsers.
Good news is that Google decided to use the previous format, png, as fallback for browsers that do not support WebP. So, Firefox and Internet Explorer users load png images when the store is visited, while Chrome and Opera WebP images.
The problem here is that the png images are much larger in size because they have been saved with better quality settings (and because the format produces larger-sized images after all).
Here is a quick comparison of a couple of store images:
What's interesting is that Google is apparently using jpg images for at least some of the phone screenshots, while it is using png exclusively for larger screenshots. If you compare those two formats, you will notice that the size difference is not that large anymore. While WebP is still using a couple of Kilobytes less on average than images saved as jpg , it is usually just that and not that big of a deal, at least not for end-users.
Google on the other hand may save quite some bandwidth this way.
As far as png images are concerned, it is not clear why Google is not reducing the quality of those images as well to reduce them in size. A quick conversion of the png images of the table above reduced their size to about 40K each without sacrificing too much quality. While that is still nowhere near WebP sizes, it would mean faster page loading times for fallback users.
Improved page loading times are a good thing, even though only some users will benefit from them in the short run. Mozilla decided against implementing WebP in Firefox some time ago, but a second bug listing was opened several months ago that attempts to get the format supported in the browser after all. It is not really clear yet if it will be supported or rejected again.
On a personal note: I do not like the Play Store at all. I dislike its design and find it nearly unusable on desktop systems. It may work great on mobile devices, but the lack of a proper "new" releases listing means that it is impossible to browse the store for new releases. All it seems you get are spoon-fed "top" releases. Also, why is there no distinction between applications and games in the store?
What's your take on the new Google Play design? (via Android Police)Advertisement
Advertising revenue is falling fast across the Internet, and independently-run sites like Ghacks are hit hardest by it. The advertising model in its current form is coming to an end, and we have to find other ways to continue operating this site.
We are committed to keeping our content free and independent, which means no paywalls, no sponsored posts, no annoying ad formats or subscription fees.
If you like our content, and would like to help, please consider making a contribution:
Ghacks is a technology news blog that was founded in 2005 by Martin Brinkmann. It has since then become one of the most popular tech news sites on the Internet with five authors and regular contributions from freelance writers.