Microsoft Surface Pro pricing information

Martin Brinkmann
Nov 6, 2012
Updated • Nov 6, 2012
Hardware, Microsoft, Windows 8

Microsoft is currently preparing to launch the Surface Pro in the next 1-2 months, after having shipped the Surface RT during the launch of the Windows 8 operating system at the end of October. The Surface Pro ships with Windows 8 Professional, a full desktop operating system that enables users to not only install Windows Store apps on the device but also desktop software. This, and better hardware, make it a viable solution for users who want to use the device in a professional work environment and situations where desktop software needs to be run.

Microsoft for some time now has been tight lipped about its product launches, so that essential information such as pricing or hardware are not revealed in advance. The company has not revealed Surface Pro pricing information yet, with estimates ranging from $599 to over $1000 for the device.

A German online shopping site has now listed both Surface Pro models including pricing information on its website. While not officially confirmed, it provides us with a first price range for both devices. According to the site, the Microsoft Surface Pro with 64 Gigabyte of storage will be available for €809 ($1033 or £646) while the larger 128 Gigabyte version for €909 ($1,161 or £726). In comparison, the Surface RT with 64 Gigabyte and touch-cover is available for €699 in the shop.

German pricing always includes the 19% VAT so that you may need to subtract the amount in the US to come up with a reasonable price. This would mean $836 for the Surface Pro with 64 Gigabyte, and $940 for the 128 Gigabyte Surface Pro model.

The site lists the following hardware specs:

  • 10.6" Full HD ClearType multi-touch display with a resolution of 1920x1080
  • Intel Core i5 3rd generation processor
  • 4 Gigabyte of RAM
  • 64 or 128 Gigabyte of storage
  • Intel HD 4000 graphics
  • Wireless LAN 802.11 a/b/g/n
  • Bluetooth 4.0
  • HD front and back camera with True Color and internal microphone
  • VaporMG case
  • Stylus
  • Weight: 900 mg

It is not clear if the device will ship with a touch or type cover, or if the covers need to be ordered separately. The product image on the site displays the Surface tablet with cover, while the Surface RT cover shots are displayed without a cover which could indicate that it ships with a cover included.

microsoft surface pricing

Both devices are available for preorder on the site and deliverable in 3-4 weeks indicating a launch at the end of November or beginning of December.

What's your take on the pricing? Will you get a Surface Pro if the prices prove to be true, or do you think that it is too expensive for what it is offering?

The integrated video card is disappointing, especially for users who require a powerful video processing unit. Gamers too will almost certainly run into issues here. While older and less taxing games, as well as Windows Store games should work fine on the system, it is certain that new and taxing games won't run well or at all on the device. (via Softpedia)


Tutorials & Tips

Previous Post: «
Next Post: «


  1. Gonzo said on November 6, 2012 at 9:45 pm

    That’s too much for half a computer running Windows. I also don’t like how Intel is labeling a ~2Ghz dual core as a Core i5 in an attempt to justify the price. It’s performance will be on par with a Pentium and it’s price should reflect that.

    1. Ben said on November 7, 2012 at 8:26 am

      You are greatly mistaken comparing Core I5 performance to Pentium. There is much more to CPU performance than clock speed. Ivy bridge chips have a more advanced micro-architecture than Pentiums. Even at the same clock speed, the Ivy bridge chips have much more instruction throughput than Pentium chips, while also providing lower power consumption.

      1. Gonzo said on November 8, 2012 at 10:25 pm

        I have little doubt the Pentium B900 series or even the older P6000 series will outperform the “Core i5” included with the Surface Pro. Apples to Oranges comparison with regards to power management, I know. I simply brought it up to show just how much of a premium they’re asking for this “low power” design. It’s unreasonable imo.

    2. Martin Brinkmann said on November 6, 2012 at 11:08 pm

      While that’s surely disappointing, I still would like to get my hands on a test sample to try it out in the wild before I make a final conclusion.

      1. Gonzo said on November 7, 2012 at 2:47 am

        I too look forward to playing with one. It’s great to see Intel energized again by competition from ARM. They finally seem committed to producing low power chips. That being said, I think I’d be wise to wait for a 2nd gen Intel tablet (Haswell) before considering a purchase.

        I get the feeling Intel rushed Ivy Bridge out the door for Win 8. The improvements over Sandy Bridge were minimal. Haswell should be a marked improvement. Not to mention the price could drop significantly.

Leave a Reply

Check the box to consent to your data being stored in line with the guidelines set out in our privacy policy

We love comments and welcome thoughtful and civilized discussion. Rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please stay on-topic.
Please note that your comment may not appear immediately after you post it.