<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; writer</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/writer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:53:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Check Which Famous Writer You Write Like</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/19/check-which-famous-writer-you-write-like/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/19/check-which-famous-writer-you-write-like/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:12:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Online Services]]></category> <category><![CDATA[famous writer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[i write like]]></category> <category><![CDATA[text analysis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[writer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[writing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=28396</guid> <description><![CDATA[I write like who? That was the first thing coming to my mind after pasting in my first text into a form on the I Write Like website, but more on that later. I Write Like is a web service that analyses text pasted into a web form, to come up with a famous writer [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write like who? That was the first thing coming to my mind after pasting in my first text into a form on the I Write Like website, but more on that later. I Write Like is a web service that analyses text pasted into a web form, to come up with a famous writer who writes like that.</p><p>Here is how it works in detail. Copy a few paragraphs of a text you have written, and paste it into the form on the I Write Like website.</p><p><span
id="more-28396"></span><div
id="attachment_28397" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/i-write-like.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/i-write-like-300x300.png" alt="i write like" title="i write like" width="300" height="300" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-28397" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">i write like</p></div></p><p>Click the Analyze button afterwards to start the text analysis. I Write Like displays the name of a famous writer on the next page. The page unfortunately does not list information about the writer, just a link to books on Amazon.</p><div
id="attachment_28399" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/famous-writer.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/famous-writer-300x300.png" alt="famous writer" title="famous writer" width="300" height="300" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-28399" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">famous writer</p></div><p>I apparently write like Stephen King, Cory Doctorow or James Joyce, depending on the paragraphs pasted into the form. Mostly Cory Doctorow though, whom I have never heard about before. <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cory_Doctorow">Wikipedia</a> tells me that Cory is a Canadian blogger and writer, good to know.</p><p>The You Write Like result&#8217;s page contains badges to embed the information on a website. Links to post to Twitter, Facebook, Google Buzz and Tumblr are also provided.</p><p>The developer recently revealed in a blog post how the service determines the famous writer.</p><blockquote><p>“Actually, the algorithm is not a rocket science, and you can find it on every computer today. It’s a Bayesian classifier, which is widely used to fight spam on the Internet. Take for example the “Mark as spam” button in Gmail or Outlook. When you receive a message that you think is spam, you click this button, and the internal database gets trained to recognize future messages similar to this one as spam. This is basically how “I Write Like” works on my side: I feed it with “Frankenstein” and tell it, “This is Mary Shelley. Recognize works similar to this as Mary Shelley.” Of course, the algorithm is slightly different from the one used to detect spam, because it takes into account more stylistic features of the text, such as the number of words in sentences, the number of commas, semicolons, and whether the sentence is a direct speech or a quotation.”</p></blockquote><p>So, <a
href="http://iwl.me/">who do you write</a> like?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/19/check-which-famous-writer-you-write-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>10</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Minimalistic Text Editor Crea Writer</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/03/04/minimalistic-text-editor-crea-writer/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/03/04/minimalistic-text-editor-crea-writer/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:47:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[crea writer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[text]]></category> <category><![CDATA[text editor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[writer]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=23486</guid> <description><![CDATA[Distractions can slow down the work flow tremendously. That&#8217;s true for almost every profession. Crea Writer is an application for the Windows operating system that provides writers with a minimalistic distraction free interface so that they can solely concentrate on the writing task. It is not the first application to provide users with these options, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Distractions can slow down the work flow tremendously. That&#8217;s true for almost every profession. Crea Writer is an application for the Windows operating system that provides writers with a minimalistic distraction free interface so that they can solely concentrate on the writing task.</p><p>It is not the first application to provide users with these options, we have reviewed several programs like <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/02/distraction-free-writing-with-pyroom/">PyRoom for Linux</a> or <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/14/full-screen-writer-write-monkey/">Write Monkey</a> for the Windows operating system.</p><p>Crea Writer launches as a full screen application that can either display a selected background image or a white background. Users who donate can change the background colors and other settings of the program (for instance reversing the colors to a black background and white text color).</p><p><span
id="more-23486"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/crea_writer-500x281.gif" alt="" title="crea writer" width="500" height="281" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-23487" /></p><p>The controls are not shown in full screen mode unless the mouse is moved to either side of the screen. All controls are then displayed in a left and right sidebar with the left bar containing text formatting controls and the right file operations and options.</p><p>The standard version is limited compared to the version that users get when they donate. It for instance lacks hotkeys, auto saves, some text formatting controls, the break timer or the configurable display colors.</p><p>The background image can either be disabled, set to be transparent or exchanged with another image. The text component is not nearly as complex as that offered by Word or other word processors. It lacks some features that one would expect from text editors like the ability to create chapters or to include images.</p><p>It should be sufficient for users who only want to write text in a minimalistic distraction free environment. But then again, using Notepad in full screen mode has nearly the same effect.</p><p><a
href="http://www.creawriter.com/">Crea Writer</a> can be downloaded from the developer&#8217;s website. It works with most Windows operating systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/03/04/minimalistic-text-editor-crea-writer/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>GNOME Office: Is it a viable office suite?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/11/gnome-office-is-it-a-viable-office-suite/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/11/gnome-office-is-it-a-viable-office-suite/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Jack Wallen</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Desktop Manager]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Calc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[excel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[MS Office]]></category> <category><![CDATA[office]]></category> <category><![CDATA[office suite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[powerpoint]]></category> <category><![CDATA[presents]]></category> <category><![CDATA[word]]></category> <category><![CDATA[writer]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=18403</guid> <description><![CDATA[When you think about office suites, two names come to mind: Microsoft Office and OpenOffice. There is a good reason for that &#8211; they are the two powerhouses in the field. Of course there are alternatives. For Windows there is Softmaker Office and Lotus Symphony. For the Mac there is iWork. For Linux there is [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you think about office suites, two names come to mind: Microsoft Office and OpenOffice. There is a good reason for that &#8211; they are the two powerhouses in the field. Of course there are alternatives. For Windows there is Softmaker Office and Lotus Symphony. For the Mac there is iWork. For Linux there is Softmaker Office, Lotus Symphony, KOffice and GNOME Office. Although the vast majority of Linux users depend upon OpenOffice for their office needs, the alternatives should not be overlooked.</p><p>But is GNOME office and alternative that you should overlook? More than likely most readers didn&#8217;t even know there was a <a
title="GNOME Office" href="http://live.gnome.org/GnomeOffice" target="_blank">GNOME office</a>. And of those that have heard rumors of this suite, many probably didn&#8217;t even know it was ready for installation. It is. But the big question&#8230;is it worth try? In this article I will highlight the tools that make up GNOME Office and help you to decide if this suite is worth your time.</p><p><span
id="more-18403"></span></p><p><strong>Installation</strong></p><p>The first thing I should bring up is the installation. Previous incarnations of GNOME Office required the user to install the pieces separately. That has changed and now you can open up the GNOME Software Center and follow these steps:</p><ol><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Search for &#8216;gnome office&#8221;.</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Select GNOME Office.</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Click the right-pointing arrow.</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Click the Install button.</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Enter your password.</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Sit back and watch the installation happen.</span></li></ol><p>What GNOME office installs is the following (some may already be installed):</p><ul><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Abiword: Word processor</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Gnumeric: Spreadsheet</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Evolution: Email, contacts, calendar</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Planner: Project manager</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Inkscape: Vector graphics</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">XSane: Scanning</span></li></ul><p>There are other tools that are supposed to be included with GNOME Office, but are not installed:</p><ul><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Gnucash: Finances.</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">gLables: Label designer</span></li><li><span
style="background-color: #ffffff">Glom: Database designer.</span></li></ul><p>Why the above tools are listed on the GNOME Office official site and not installed I have no clue.  Of course those are simple enough to install, just by going to the Software Center and going through the same steps above.</p><p><strong>Value of the applications</strong></p><p>Instead of taking each piece apart and showing you how they work, I want to spend a little time on whether or not each application is a worthy usurper of your current tool. And since I do not know the tool you are using, the usurper is going to have to be pretty good.</p><p><strong>Abiword</strong>: I have always wanted to like Abiword. And, in some instances I do. But the problem is that Abiword really stinks at document exchange. Abiword&#8217;s idea of formatting doesn&#8217;t always gel with another Office Suite&#8217;s idea. But I will say that Abiword has come a long, long way. And if you are just needing a simple word processor that is lightweight and fast, Abiword is a great alternative. Does it match the skills of OpenOffice? Not so much.</p><p><strong>Gnumeric:</strong> Another tool that I have always wanted to like, but have been prevented from doing so because of its poor ability to work with other tools. Any spreadsheet that uses complex formulas or formatting will most likely wind up a bit of a mess in Gnumeric. But for basic spreadsheet use, Gnumeric will get the job done.</p><p><strong>Evolution: </strong>If you are looking for a groupware suite to take the place of MS Outlook, this is where you need to go. Evolution is, without question, the best groupware suite available for Linux. It&#8217;s power, easy to use, reliable, and includes everything you need for a groupware suite. This is, by far, the best tool of the GNOME Office suite.</p><p><strong>Planner</strong>: Because most office suites do not generally include a project management tool, planner is a surprising addition to the suite. Not only does planner bring a much needed tool to the office suite, it does so with aplomb.</p><p><strong>Inkscape: </strong>There is only one office suite that includes a vector graphics application &#8211; OpenOffice. Inkscape brings to GNOME Office one tool that the competition can not touch. Inkscape is the best vector graphics tool for the Linux operating system. There is, however, a rather steep learning curve that comes with using Inkscape. So don&#8217;t expect to just jump into this tool without any idea of what you are doing.</p><p><strong>XSane: </strong>You can read my article on Xscane (&#8220;<a
title="Scanning in Linux with iScan and XSane" href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/01/scanning-in-linux-with-iscan-and-xsane/" target="_blank">Scanning in Linux with iScan and XSane</a>.&#8221;) I think most readers will agree that XSane is an overly complex tool for a simple task. However, XSane can be made simple by simply closing all of the unnecessary windows.</p><p><strong>The verdict</strong></p><p>Although GNOME Office makes a valiant a<span
style="background-color: #ffffff">ttempt at replacing your current office suite, it fails in too many categories to actually usurp the big dogs in this space. Now, if are in a situation where you are not having to trade documents with others and you do not need the power features of tools like Excel or Calc, and you don&#8217;t need a tool for presentations then GNOME Office might be your go-to suite of tools. Otherwise, stick with OpenOffice or MS Office.</span></p><p>What do you think? Is GNOME Office a worthy entry in the office suite category?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/11/11/gnome-office-is-it-a-viable-office-suite/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>12</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Full Screen Writer Write Monkey</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/14/full-screen-writer-write-monkey/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/14/full-screen-writer-write-monkey/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:25:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[portable software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[text]]></category> <category><![CDATA[text editing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[text editor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[word processor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[writer]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=12008</guid> <description><![CDATA[Write Monkey is a text editor that offers several unique features to stand out of the masses of other writers and editors. The first and probably most noticeable feature is the full screen mode which displays a black screen without any text editing buttons and toolbars except for the main menu bar. The light green [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/writer.jpg" alt="writer" title="writer" width="118" height="110" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-12006" />Write Monkey is a text editor that offers several unique features to stand out of the masses of other writers and editors. The first and probably most noticeable feature is the full screen mode which displays a black screen without any text editing buttons and toolbars except for the main menu bar. The light green text is perfectly readable on the background. A right-click in the interface will open a menu that lists all the available options that are at the writers disposal including switching between full and window mode, switching between text and repository or enabling so called jumps.</p><p>Jumps display bookmarks, paragraphs and headings of the text in a separate always on top window which makes it convenient and comfortable to navigate the text. The colors and pretty much any design parameter can be changed in the program&#8217;s option to allow the user to select his own fonts, colors and page layout.</p><p>The repository which was mentioned earlier is not part of the original text but is connected to it. It can be filled with ideas and text that is not yet ready to be included in the real text document. Texts can be saved in text format only with the option to export markup &#8211; like bold or italic text &#8211; so that it can be viewed correctly in web browsers and word processors.</p><p><span
id="more-12008"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/text_writer-499x238.jpg" alt="text_writer" title="text_writer" width="499" height="238" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-12007" /></p><p>Another interesting feature is the progress bar which can be used to define a text length which is often required when writing journalistic texts or essays. The very same menu contains countless statistics about the text that has been written so far and a function called sprint writing which will limit the writing time. Both the text progress and the time limit can be displayed in the main interface.</p><p>Additional features:</p><ul><li>Customizable Printing</li><li>Spell Checker</li><li>Multi Monitor Support</li><li>Firefox Integration</li><li>Auto Backups, History</li><li>Replacements (add predefined text by writing shortcuts)</li><li>Bookmarks</li></ul><p>The main problem that many writers will face is that the document can only be saved in text format which might require a few additional steps in another word processor to save the document in another format or to beautify it before publishing it or sending it in.</p><p><a
href="http://writemonkey.com/index.php">Write Monkey</a> (via <a
href="http://www.techyard.net/fullscreen-distraction-free-writer-write-monkey/">Tech Yard</a>) is a portable application for the Windows operating system that requires the Microsoft .net Framework 2.0 or higher</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/14/full-screen-writer-write-monkey/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>16</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows Live Writer Preview</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/03/windows-live-writer-preview/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/03/windows-live-writer-preview/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:29:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category> <category><![CDATA[blog]]></category> <category><![CDATA[editor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[live]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[writer]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4739</guid> <description><![CDATA[The newest version of Windows Live Writer has been released as a technical preview, primarily to showcase changes to the SDK. That isn’t to say this build is simply internal changes, you’ll find a number of new features and even some UI modifications. In fact I think once you have a bit of a poke [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newest version of <a
href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/0/9/809604cd-bd08-42c8-b590-49c332059e64/writer.msi">Windows Live Writer</a> has been released as a technical preview, primarily to showcase changes to the SDK. That isn’t to say this build is simply internal changes, you’ll find a number of new features and even some UI modifications.</p><p>In fact I think once you have a bit of a poke around you’ll discover quite a few changes which really improve the program.</p><p><b>Changes to the UI:</b></p><ul><li>The addition of tabs along the bottom of the screen which switch views between normal, preview and HTML. It doesn’t look quite as attractive but it’s certainly more usable</li><li>Toolbar revised and Weblogs menu moved to the top right</li><li>Search through your categories</li></ul><p><b>New Features:</b></p><ul><li>Video Publishing was possible through a plug-in, but now it has been incorporated into the program.</li><li>Image editing, now you can add 5 more borders to your images and rotate, adjust contrast, tilt and crop. The addition of crop is particularly useful.</li><li>Word Count! Boy I’m sure glad this was included&#8230; I would say that out of all these changes it’s the feature I most wanted, even though you could get it through a plugin.</li><li>Support for.gif, Lightbox and other image previewing effects</li><li>Addition of ‘check for updates’ in the help context menu</li><li>Images can now be centred from the properties panel</li><li>Automatic linking to specified terms. (example: I could specify a frequently used word such as <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/">gHacks</a> to be auto-linked)</li></ul><p><span
id="more-4739"></span><p><b>SDK changes</b></p><p>These are quite significant changes, but I think I can foresee some issues coming in the future. The SDK now allows for two new plugin types:</p><p>Code can now be executed before or after a blog post is published. Two example have been included with the preview for Twitter and Digg. This means blog posts can now be automatically submitted to Digg or your Twitter stream or a myriad other services. While this is handy it does mean some people will abuse the system.</p><p>Digg isn’t about submitting every blog posts you write, it’s about submitting a page that is actually <em>good</em>. That was the whole purpose, filter out the crap. Otherwise how does Digg become different then simply having your blog indexed by Google?</p><p>Plugins can also now be created to insert content into your headers or footers plugins can insert content as you publish your blog post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/03/windows-live-writer-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
