<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; windows vulnerability</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Duqu Zero-Day Exploit Discovered, Removal Tool Released</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/11/02/duqu-zero-day-exploit-discovered-removal-tool-released/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/11/02/duqu-zero-day-exploit-discovered-removal-tool-released/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:38:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[duqu]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rootkit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=52230</guid> <description><![CDATA[If you have been following security news lately you may have already heard about the Duqu rootkit that combines the technology of the Stuxnet rootkit with a backdoor trojan and keylogger. Duqu has been discovered on October 18 and infection reports have started to come in soon thereafter. Not all security suites and products detect [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have been following security news lately you may have already heard about the Duqu rootkit that combines the technology of the Stuxnet rootkit with a backdoor trojan and keylogger. Duqu has been discovered on October 18 and infection reports have started to come in soon thereafter.<br
/> Not all security suites and products detect the Duqu rootkit right now which, in combination with the fact that it exploits a zero-day vulnerability in Windows, makes it a very dangerous threat. Microsoft is currently working on a patch to protect systems from the vulnerability (which would make further infections on patched PCs impossible)</p><p>Rootkit.Duqu.A is digitally signed (with a stolen and revoked certificate) which means that it targets not only 32-bit Windows systems but also 64-bit editions of the Microsoft Windows operating system. According to information posted by <a
href="http://www.duquremoval.com/en.html?country=in">Bitdefender</a>, Duqu runs for 36 days on a computer collecting information entered via the keyboard. This may include passwords, emails, conversations, logins on popular sites and even banking and credit card information.</p><p><a
href="http://www.symantec.com/connect/w32-duqu_status-updates_installer-zero-day-exploit">Symantec</a> has posted additional information about Duqu&#8217;s installer. According to Symantec&#8217;s information, Duqu is spread as a Microsoft Word document that exploits a Windows kernel vulnerability that allows code execution. When a user opens the Word document the malicious code is executed and Duqu is installed on the system.</p><p>Duqu infections have already been confirmed in countries such as France, Switzerland, India, the United Kingdom, Austria and the Netherlands.</p><p>Symantec has <a
href="http://www.symantec.com/content/en/us/enterprise/media/security_response/whitepapers/w32_duqu_the_precursor_to_the_next_stuxnet.pdf">released</a> a whitepaper in pdf format that contains all known details up to this point.</p><p>Windows users who want to make sure that their system is clean and not infected by the Duqu rootkit can use Bitdefender&#8217;s Removal Tool to scan the system and if necessary disinfect it.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/duqu-rootkit-removal.jpg"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/duqu-rootkit-removal.jpg" alt="duqu rootkit removal" title="duqu rootkit removal" width="484" height="466" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-52231" /></a></p><p>The portable rootkit remover can be downloaded from an official Bitdefender website. All that Windows users need to do is to click on the Scan button to start the scan. The program will list any files that have been identified to be part of the Duqu rootkit. Please note that the program may require elevated rights on some machines.</p><p>Is there a way to protect your computer in the meantime? Yes, do not open Word documents locally. Use an online document viewer like Google Docs or Docs.com for that. (<a
href="http://techdows.com/2011/10/duqu-removal-tool.html">via</a>)</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/11/02/duqu-zero-day-exploit-discovered-removal-tool-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>14</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows 0-Day Vulnerability Workaround</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/01/29/windows-0-day-vulnerability-workaround/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/01/29/windows-0-day-vulnerability-workaround/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:25:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mhtml]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=39397</guid> <description><![CDATA[A new 0-day vulnerability has been confirmed yesterday. The vulnerability affects all client and server versions of Microsoft Windows up to and including Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2. Security Advisory 2501696 reveals that the &#8220;vulnerability exists due to the way MHTML interprets MIME-formatted requests for content blocks within a document&#8221; and that it [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new 0-day vulnerability has been confirmed yesterday. The vulnerability affects all client and server versions of Microsoft Windows up to and including Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2.</p><p>Security Advisory <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/2501696.mspx">2501696</a> reveals that the &#8220;vulnerability exists due to the way MHTML interprets MIME-formatted requests for content blocks within a document&#8221; and that it &#8220;could allow an attacker to cause a victim to run malicious scripts when visiting various Web sites, resulting in information disclosure&#8221;.</p><blockquote><p>The vulnerability exists due to the way MHTML interprets MIME-formatted requests for content blocks within a document. It is possible under certain conditions for this vulnerability to allow an attacker to inject a client-side script in the response of a Web request run in the context of the victim&#8217;s Internet Explorer. The script could spoof content, disclose information, or take any action that the user could take on the affected Web site on behalf of the targeted user.</p></blockquote><p>An example of a possible attack is given by Angela Gunn at the <a
href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2011/01/28/microsoft-releases-security-advisory-2501696.aspx">MSRC</a> blog:</p><blockquote><p>For instance, an attacker could construct an HTML link designed to trigger a malicious script and somehow convince the targeted user to click it. When the user clicked that link, the malicious script would run on the user&#8217;s computer for the rest of the current Internet Explorer session.  Such a script might collect user information (eg., email), spoof content displayed in the browser, or otherwise interfere with the user&#8217;s experience.</p></blockquote><p>Microsoft admits that proof-of-concept code has been published but mentions that they are not aware of active exploitations of the issue.</p><p>A workaround has been posted on the Security Advisory page. It basically locks down the MHTML protocol to protect the Windows operating system from possible exploits. Users need to modify the Windows Registry if they follow the suggested actions on the Security Advisory page. Administrators find information on how to apply it across domains by using Group Policy there as well.</p><p>Another option is to change the Internet Explorer security settings to high to block ActiveX Controls and Active Scripting. This may have an impact on websites and services that make use of the technologies.</p><p>A <a
href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2501696">Fix-It</a> solution has been created as well which makes the patching more comfortable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/01/29/windows-0-day-vulnerability-workaround/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Microsoft Releases Out Of Band Security Patch</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/28/microsoft-releases-out-of-band-security-patch/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/28/microsoft-releases-out-of-band-security-patch/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:29:10 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows server]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows server update]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-update]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=35362</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft today released a new out of band security bulletin addressing a vulnerability in ASP.NET that affects all versions of the Microsoft .Net Framework when used on Windows Server operating systems, or on client systems that run a web server from their computer. While that excludes the majority of desktop users, it may still affect [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft today released a new out of band security bulletin addressing a vulnerability in ASP.NET that affects all versions of the Microsoft .Net Framework when used on Windows Server operating systems, or on client systems that run a web server from their computer.</p><p>While that excludes the majority of desktop users, it may still affect some that run web servers on their desktop systems. Those users are asked to update immediately once the patch is released.</p><p>About the release: Microsoft will make the security patch available on Microsoft Download first, before it will be distributed via Windows Update.  Dave Forstrom, Director, Trustworthy Computing said it will take approximately a few days before the update is released on Windows Update and Windows Server Update as well.</p><p>For now, Windows Server users and Windows client users running a web server should <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/default.aspx">monitor</a> Microsoft&#8217;s Download Center for the patch, which will be made available there later today.</p><p>Admins who want additional information can take a closer look at the Microsoft Security Bulletin, which lists the affected operating systems, the maximum security impact and additional information about the vulnerability.</p><blockquote><p>This security update resolves a publicly disclosed vulnerability in ASP.NET. The vulnerability could allow information disclosure. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could read data, such as the view state, which was encrypted by the server. This vulnerability can also be used for data tampering, which, if successfully exploited, could be used to decrypt and tamper with the data encrypted by the server. Microsoft .NET Framework versions prior to Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 are not affected by the file content disclosure portion of this vulnerability.</p><p>This security update is rated Important for all supported editions of ASP.NET except Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 Service Pack 3. For more information, see the subsection, Affected and Non-Affected Software, in this section.<br
/> The security update addresses the vulnerability by additionally signing all data that is encrypted by ASP.NET. For more information about the vulnerability, see the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) subsection for the specific vulnerability entry under the next section, Vulnerability Information.</p></blockquote><p>Windows client users who are not running a web server are not affected by the vulnerability. Some may want to consider installing the update nevertheless.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/28/microsoft-releases-out-of-band-security-patch/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows DLL Hijack Vulnerability Affects Exe Files As Well</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/11/windows-dll-hijack-vulnerability-affects-exe-files-as-well/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/11/windows-dll-hijack-vulnerability-affects-exe-files-as-well/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:37:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dll hijack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[webdav]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=34155</guid> <description><![CDATA[The recently discovered DLL hijack vulnerability in Windows appears to be more critical than thought. Up until now it was confirmed that Windows would load dlls from the current working directory if they cannot be found in directories with a higher search priority. This in turn meant that attackers had to use a dll unknown [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recently discovered DLL hijack vulnerability in Windows appears to be more critical than thought. Up until now it was confirmed that Windows would load dlls from the current working directory if they cannot be found in directories with a higher search priority. This in turn meant that attackers had to use a dll unknown on the system to exploit the vulnerability. Users who want a confirmed list of Windows programs that are affected by the DLL vulnerability can visit <a
href="http://secunia.com/advisories/windows_insecure_library_loading/">Secunia</a> for that. At the time of writing, a total of 123 different applications by 47 vendors are affected.</p><p>The problem with executable files is that the search priority list changes. According to a blog post at the <a
href="http://blog.acrossecurity.com/2010/09/binary-planting-goes-exe.html">Acros Security</a> blog, exe files are either loaded with the highest or second highest priority in Windows.</p><p>This means for instance that a command to launch a new process will look into the current working directory prior to looking into the Windows directories or directories in the path environment.</p><p>An attacker could exploit this by placing executables of the same name in the working directory, e.g. a malicious explorer.exe that is launched by the application executed by the user of the system.</p><p>What does it mean? It means that the situation is highly critical as the available workarounds to protect a system from the DLL hijacking vulnerability are not working to protect it against the exe hijacking.</p><blockquote><p>[CreateProcess] Apparently the current working directory is in the second place, which means that when an application tries to launch the Windows Calculator by calling something like CreateProcess(NULL,&#8221;calc.exe&#8221;,&#8230;),  a malicious calc.exe  lurking in the current working directory will get launched instead. And remotely, too, if the current working directory happens to point to a remote network share in a local network or on Internet. And no, launching remote executables using these functions will never issue any security warnings to the user, in contrast to ShellExecute*. As far as we know, introducing ShellExecute-like security warnings to these functions would cause serious problems with various batch jobs and server back-end operations running without humans present.</p></blockquote><p>Acros have created a test and have released it to the public. The Online Binary Planting Exposure Test is available on <a
href="http://www.binaryplanting.com/test.htm">Binaryplanting.com</a>. This test is aimed at users who want totest their exposure to binary planting attacks.</p><p>The easiest way to fix the issue, at least for users who do not use WebDav is to disable it. Windows 7 users need to open the Windows Services with the hotkey Windows-R, typing services.msc and hitting enter. They then need to locate the service WebClient, which is set to manual by default. A double-click on the entry and the selection of disabled disables the service completely on the operating system.</p><div
id="attachment_34156" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 430px"><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/webclient.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/webclient.png" alt="webclient" title="webclient" width="420" height="474" class="size-full wp-image-34156" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">webclient</p></div><p>The issue itself still exists on local drives, after disabling WebDav. An example was given for Apple&#8217;s Safari web browser, which can be used in the attacks (Apple has updated the browser since then):</p><blockquote><p>As a result of an incorrect process launching in Apple Safari for Windows, an attacker can cause her malicious EXE [1] to be loaded and executed from local drives, remote Windows shares, and even shares located on Internet.</p><p>What a remote attacker has to do is plant a malicious explorer.exe on a network share and get the user to open an HTML file from this network location with Safari &#8211; which should require minimal social engineering. Then, when the user tries to open one of his downloaded files in the<br
/> containing folder (e.g., menu: Window -> Downloads -> right-click on a file -> Show Containing Folder), the malicious explorer.exe is launched instead of the legitimate one.</p><p>Alternatively, if the HTML file opens (or redirects to) any &#8220;file://&#8221; location, Safari&#8217;s attempt to launch Windows Explorer will result in launching the malicious explorer.exe. (<a
href="http://www.acrossecurity.com/aspr/ASPR-2010-09-08-1-PUB.txt">via</a>)</p></blockquote><p>Security software that is up to date is the most effective option in protecting the system from local attacks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/11/windows-dll-hijack-vulnerability-affects-exe-files-as-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>DLLHijackAuditor, Check Programs For DLL Hijack Vulnerability</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/06/dllhijackauditor-check-programs-for-dll-hijack-vulnerability/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/06/dllhijackauditor-check-programs-for-dll-hijack-vulnerability/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dll]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dll hijack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dllhijackaudit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability scanner]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=33973</guid> <description><![CDATA[A new Windows vulnerability was made public in the end of August, which could allow remote code execution on a computer system. The issue is caused by programs and applications that use insecure programming practices. According to various researchers at least 40 popular applications are affected by the vulnerability. New users who want to read [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new Windows vulnerability was made public in the end of August, which could allow remote code execution on a computer system. The issue is caused by programs and applications that use insecure programming practices. According to various researchers at least 40 popular applications are affected by the vulnerability.</p><p>New users who want to read up on it can open our coverage of the <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2010/08/26/microsoft-offers-workaround-for-remote-dll-vulnerability/">issue</a>, or <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/2269637.mspx">Microsoft&#8217;s Security Advisory</a>. Both offer a deeper explanation and workarounds for the issue.</p><p>The free software DLLHiJackAuditor has been designed to test software for the vulnerability. The portable program can audit any 32-bit Windows application.</p><p>The program is dead easy to use. Users need to select an application from the computer system first before they click on the start audit button to test the application.</p><div
id="attachment_33974" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 510px"><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/dll-hijack-vulnerability.png"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/dll-hijack-vulnerability-500x373.png" alt="dll hijack vulnerability" title="dll hijack vulnerability" width="500" height="373" class="size-medium wp-image-33974" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">dll hijack vulnerability</p></div><p>The portable software will automatically load the application, and terminate it. It will uncover any vulnerable DLLs that are found during the audit, and report those back to the user of the program.</p><p>The Exploit button becomes active if a vulnerable DLL has been found in the selected software.</p><p>Finally, it is possible to create a HTML report of the findings, which contains detailed technical information that the developer of the vulnerable application can use to fix the issue.</p><p>DLL Hijack Audit does not require any third party tools to function properly. It has in addition been designed in a way that it does not trigger antivirus or security software on the system. Finally, the program require no special privileges for auditing applications, with the exception if the target executable does).</p><p>The software program is available for download at the developer website over at <a
href="http://securityxploded.com/dllhijackauditor.php">SecurityXploded</a>. The tool can be useful for software developers, and users who want to make sure that the programs they run on their system are not affected by the security issue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/09/06/dllhijackauditor-check-programs-for-dll-hijack-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Microsoft Offers Workaround For Remote DLL Vulnerability</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/08/26/microsoft-offers-workaround-for-remote-dll-vulnerability/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/08/26/microsoft-offers-workaround-for-remote-dll-vulnerability/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:03:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[dll preloading]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft security advisory]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft-windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=33601</guid> <description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was recently discovered in Microsoft Windows operating systems that exploits the default dll loading behavior. A Microsoft Security Advisory explains that the &#8220;issue is caused by specific insecure programming practices that allow so-called binary planting or DLL preloading attacks&#8221;. In simple terms: Applications that do not use qualified paths for external dynamic link [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A vulnerability was recently discovered in Microsoft Windows operating systems that exploits the default dll loading behavior. A Microsoft Security Advisory <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/2269637.mspx">explains</a> that the &#8220;issue is caused by specific insecure programming practices that allow so-called binary planting or DLL preloading attacks&#8221;.</p><p>In simple terms: Applications that do not use qualified paths for external dynamic link libraries use Windows default settings to find those dlls on the system, and one of the first locations to be searched is the program directory, which can be a local or remote directory.</p><p>The exploit dlls simply have to be placed in those directories to be executed by the applications. Affected are many popular programs, including Firefox, VLC, Opera, Photoshop, uTorrent or PowerPoint.</p><p>Microsoft <a
href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2010/08/23/more-information-about-dll-preloading-remote-attack-vector.aspx">published</a> additional information about the DLL preloading remote attack vector in a blog post at the Security Research and Defense blog.</p><p>Among the information is a workaround that requires the creation of Registry keys to change the library loading behavior either on a system wide level, or specific applications.</p><blockquote><p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#92SYSTEM&#92CurrentControlSet&#92Control&#92<br
/> Session Manager&#92CWDIllegalInDllSearch<br
/> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE&#92Software&#92Microsoft&#92Windows NT&#92CurrentVersion&#92<br
/> Image File Execution Options&#92binaryname.exe&#92CWDIllegalInDllSearch</p></blockquote><p>Both keys support the following values, which have different effects depending on the location of the application:</p><blockquote><p>Scenario 1: The application is started from a local folder, such as C:\Program Files<br
/> 0xffffffff 	Removes the current working directory from the default DLL search order.<br
/> 0 	Uses the default DLL search path. This is the Windows default, and the least secure setting.<br
/> 1 	Blocks a DLL load from the current working directory if the current working directory is set to a WebDAV folder.<br
/> 2 	Blocks a DLL load from the current working directory if the current working directory is set to a remote folder.</p><p>Scenario 2: The application is started from a remote folder, such as \\remote\share<br
/> 0xffffffff 	Removes the current working directory from the default DLL search order.<br
/> 0 	Uses the default DLL search path. This is the Windows default, and the least secure setting.<br
/> 1 	Blocks a DLL load from the current working directory if the current working directory is set to a WebDAV folder.<br
/> 2 	Allows DLL load from the current working directory if the current working directory is set to a remote folder.  DLL&#8217;s that are loaded from a WebDAV share are blocked if the current working directory is set to a WebDAV share.</p><p>Scenario 3: The application is started from a WebDAV folder, such as http://remote/share<br
/> 0xffffffff 	Removes the current working directory from the default DLL search order.<br
/> 0 	Uses the default DLL search path. This is the Windows default, and the least secure setting.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/08/26/microsoft-offers-workaround-for-remote-dll-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows Shell Vulnerability, Fix Inside</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/17/windows-shell-vulnerability-fix-inside/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/17/windows-shell-vulnerability-fix-inside/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:13:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lnk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lnk files]]></category> <category><![CDATA[webdav]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows shell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=28361</guid> <description><![CDATA[A recently discovered vulnerability in Windows Shell allows remote code execution on affected computer systems if exploited correctly. A security advisory that was posted yesterday on Microsoft&#8217;s Technet website confirms limited, targeted attacks that are exploiting a vulnerability in Windows Shell and the parsing of .lnk files. Attackers could exploit the vulnerability to infect Windows [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recently discovered vulnerability in Windows Shell allows remote code execution on affected computer systems if exploited correctly. A security advisory that was posted yesterday on Microsoft&#8217;s Technet website confirms limited, targeted attacks that are exploiting a vulnerability in Windows Shell and the parsing of .lnk files.</p><p>Attackers could exploit the vulnerability to infect Windows operating systems during connection of removable drives, if autoplay is enabled on the system. The attack uses a specifically prepared lnk-file, containing code that is executed because Windows Shell does not parse that parameter sufficiently.</p><p>Affected are all Microsoft operating systems since (and including) Windows XP. Microsoft mentions other attack scenarios besides removable devices. The vulnerability can also be exploited via WebDAV or network shares.</p><p><span
id="more-28361"></span>Microsoft mentions three mitigating factors in the security advisory. A successful attack will give the attacker the same rights as the active user. Limited usage rights would mean that the attack could have less impact than an attack on a system where the user has administrative rights.</p><p>Systems with autoplay disabled cannot be attacked during connection. A user would have to launch &#8220;Windows Explorer or a similar application and browse to the root folder of the removable disk&#8221; for the attack to be started.</p><p>Finally, &#8220;Blocking outbound SMB connections on the perimeter firewall will reduce the risk of remote exploitation using file shares&#8221;.</p><p>A patch is currently not offered, a workaround exists however. The following steps need to be completed to protect a computer system:</p><h3>Disable the displaying of icons for shortcuts</h3><blockquote><p>Note Using Registry Editor incorrectly can cause serious problems that may require you to reinstall your operating system. Microsoft cannot guarantee that problems resulting from the incorrect use of Registry Editor can be solved. Use Registry Editor at your own risk. For information about how to edit the registry, view the &#8220;Changing Keys And Values&#8221; Help topic in Registry Editor (Regedit.exe) or view the &#8220;Add and Delete Information in the Registry&#8221; and &#8220;Edit Registry Data&#8221; Help topics in Regedt32.exe.</p><ol><li>Click Start, click Run, type Regedit in the Open box, and then click OK</li><li>Locate and then click the following registry key:<br
/> HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT&#92;lnkfile&#92;shellex&#92;IconHandler</li><li>Click the File menu and select Export</li><li>In the Export Registry File dialog box, enter LNK_Icon_Backup.reg and click Save<p>Note This will create a backup of this registry key in the My Documents folder by default</li><li>Select the value (Default) on the right hand window in the Registy Editor. Press Enter to edit the value of the key. Remove the value, so that the value is blank, and press Enter.</li><li>Restart explorer.exe or restart the computer.</li></ol></blockquote><p>Impact: Will disable all shortcut icons, which means for instance that all Windows 7 taskbar items or start menu items are showing as white icons, which makes identification hard to impossible.</p><p>Microsoft suggests to disable the WebClient service to block the most likely remote attack vector through the Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) client service.</p><blockquote><p>To disable the WebClient Service, follow these steps:</p><ul><li>Click Start, click Run, type Services.msc and then click OK.</li><li>Right-click WebClient service and select Properties.</li><li>Change the Startup type to Disabled. If the service is running, click Stop.</li><li>Click OK and exit the management application.</li></ul></blockquote><p>Additional information are available at the <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/2286198.mspx">Microsoft Security Advisory</a> page and the <a
href="http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1712146">Wilders Security</a> forum.</p><blockquote><p>Modules of current malware were first time detected by &#8220;VirusBlokAda&#8221; (http://anti-virus.by/en/) company specialists on the 17th of June, 2010 and were added to the anti-virus bases as Trojan-Spy.0485 and Malware-Cryptor.Win32.Inject.gen.2. During the analysis of malware there was revealed that it uses USB storage device for propagation.</p><p>You should take into consideration that virus infects Operation System in unusual way through vulnerability in processing lnk-files (without usage of autorun.inf file).</p><p>So you just have to open infected USB storage device using Microsoft Explorer or any other file manager which can display icons (for i.e. Total Commander) to infect your Operating System and allow execution of the malware.</p><p>Malware installs two drivers: mrxnet.sys and mrxcls.sys. They are used to inject code into systems processes and hide malware itself. That&#8217;s the reason why you can&#8217;t see malware files on the infected USB storage device. We have added those drivers to anti-virus bases as Rootkit.TmpHider and SScope.Rookit.TmpHider.2. Note that both drivers are signed with digital signature of Realtek Semiconductor Corp. (www.realtek.com).</p><p>Thus, current malware should be added to very dangerous category causes the risk of the virus epidemic at the current moment.</p><p>After we have added a new recordes to the anti-virus bases we are admitting a lot of detections of Rootkit.TmpHider and SScope.Rookit.TmpHider.2  all over the world.</p></blockquote><p>Expect a patch soon that is addressing the issue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/17/windows-shell-vulnerability-fix-inside/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows XP And Windows Server 2003 Zero-Day Vulnerability</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/06/16/windows-xp-and-windows-server-2003-zero-day-vulnerability/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/06/16/windows-xp-and-windows-server-2003-zero-day-vulnerability/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:13:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fix it]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft fix it]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows server 2003]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-xp]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=26647</guid> <description><![CDATA[A vulnerability in Windows Help and Support Center was discovered recently that could allow remote code execution on affected systems. Only Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 are affected by it. Microsoft is aware of limited targeted attacks that exploit the vulnerability. These attacks use specially crafted links on web pages or email messages with [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A vulnerability in Windows Help and Support Center was discovered recently that could allow remote code execution on affected systems. Only Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 are affected by it.</p><p>Microsoft is aware of limited targeted attacks that exploit the vulnerability. These attacks use specially crafted links on web pages or email messages with the hcp:// prefix instead of http://.</p><p>The HCP protocol is used to execute links in the Help and Support Center. The threat is caused by the Windows Help and Support Center not properly validating links that use the HCP protcol.</p><p><span
id="more-26647"></span>Attackers who successfully exploit the vulnerability could take complete control of the system if the user is logged in with administrative privileges. The vulnerability can only be exploited if the user clicks on a prepared link.</p><p>Microsoft has created a <a
href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2219475">Fix-It</a> script that can be used to protect Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 systems from the vulnerability.</p><p>The script disables the threat by unregistering the HCP protocol on the target system.</p><p>A manual workaround was also posted</p><blockquote><ul><li>1. Click Start, click Run, type Regedit in the Open box, and then click OK</li><li>2. Locate and then click the following registry key:<br
/> HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT&#92;HCP</li><li>3.Click the File menu and select Export</li><li>4.In the Export Registry File dialog box, enter HCP_Procotol_Backup.reg and click Save. Note This will create a backup of this registry key in the My Documents folder by default.</li><li>5. Press the Delete key on the keyboard to delete the registry key. When prompted to delete the registry key via the Confirm Key Delete dialog box, click Yes.</li></ul></blockquote><p><strong>Using a Managed Deployment Script</strong></p><blockquote><ul><li>1. Create a backup copy of the registry keys by using a managed deployment script that contains the following commands:Regedit.exe /e HCP_Protocol_Backup.reg<p>HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT&#92;HCP</li><li>2. Next, save the following to a file with a .REG extension, such as Disable_HCP_Protocol.reg:Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00<p>[-HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT&#92;HCP]</li><li>3. Run the above registry script on the target machine with the following command from an elevated command prompt: Regedit.exe /s Disable_HCP_Protocol.reg</li></ul></blockquote><p>Disabling the HCP protocol will break all links, be they local or remote, that use the HCP procotol.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/06/16/windows-xp-and-windows-server-2003-zero-day-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>9</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows 7 64-bit And Windows Server 2008 R2 Vulnerability Emerges</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/05/19/windows-7-64-bit-and-windows-server-2008-r2-vulnerabilitie-emerges/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/05/19/windows-7-64-bit-and-windows-server-2008-r2-vulnerabilitie-emerges/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows 7 patch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows 7 vulnerability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows aero]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=25521</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Microsoft Security Response team published a security advisory yesterday. The team is investigating a publicly reported vulnerability that is affecting 64-bit editions of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 as well as Windows Server 2008 R2 for Itanium systems. The vulnerability was discovered in the Windows Canonical Display Driver (cdd.dll) which is used [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Microsoft Security Response team published a security advisory yesterday. The team is investigating a publicly reported vulnerability that is affecting 64-bit editions of Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 as well as Windows Server 2008 R2 for Itanium systems.</p><p>The vulnerability was discovered in the Windows Canonical Display Driver (cdd.dll) which is used by &#8220;desktop composition to blend the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) and DirectX drawing&#8221;.</p><p>The vulnerability received a preliminary Exploitable Index rating of 3:</p><blockquote><p>Although it is possible that the vulnerability could allow code execution, successful code execution is unlikely due to memory randomization. In most scenarios, it is much more likely that an attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause the affected system to stop responding and automatically restart.</p></blockquote><p><span
id="more-25521"></span>The vulnerability is only affecting Windows systems with the Windows Aero theme installed and in use. Windows Aero is not the default theme in Windows Server 2008 R2.</p><p>Microsoft&#8217;s suggested action is to disable the Windows Aero theme for the time being until a security patch for the vulnerability is released.</p><blockquote><p>To disable Windows Aero by changing the theme, perform the following steps for each user on a system:<br
/> 1.<br
/> Click Start, select the Control Panel, and then click on Appearance and Personalization.<br
/> 2.<br
/> Under the Personalization category, click on Change the Theme.<br
/> 3.<br
/> Scroll to the bottom of the listed themes and select one of the available Basic and High Contrast Themes.</p></blockquote><p>The <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/2028859.mspx">security advisory</a> and the blog post announcing the security vulnerability contain additional information.</p><p>Update: The 64-bit vulnerability has been patched. Windows users who have downloaded all recent security patches for their operating system, or installed the first Service Pack for it, are safe from the exploit. Users who have disabled the Aero theme because of the exploit can turn it back on. This is done by following the same steps outlined above.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/05/19/windows-7-64-bit-and-windows-server-2008-r2-vulnerabilitie-emerges/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New Windows Vulnerability Uncovered [Security]</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/01/20/new-windows-vulnerability-uncovered-security/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/01/20/new-windows-vulnerability-uncovered-security/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:33:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft-windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=22469</guid> <description><![CDATA[The last days have not been pleasant for Microsoft. A new Windows vulnerability affecting all 32-bit editions of the operating system from Windows 3.11 to Windows 7 was uncovered shortly after the revelation that an exploit in Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer 6 was used in the attack on several US companies that included Google and Adobe [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last days have not been pleasant for Microsoft. A new Windows vulnerability affecting all 32-bit editions of the operating system from Windows 3.11 to Windows 7 was uncovered shortly after the revelation that an exploit in Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer 6 was used in the attack on several US companies that included Google and Adobe (read <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2010/01/16/microsoft-confirms-internet-explorer-vulnerability-security/">Microsoft Confirms Internet Explorer Vulnerability</a>)</p><p>Cause of the problem is the virtual dos machine (vdm) that was introduced in 1993 to support 16-bit applications. The exploit was uncovered by Tavis Ormandy, a member of Google&#8217;s security team. It makes it possible to run code with elevated rights on the computer system. The full technical explanation of the vulnerability and example exploit code are available at <a
href="http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-01/0346.html">Neohapsis</a>.</p><p>No patch has been issued by Microsoft until now even though Ormandy mentioned that he had contacted Microsoft about the issue six months ago. There is however a quick fix for most Windows operating systems: Disallowing VDM.</p><p><span
id="more-22469"></span>There are two possibilities on how to do that. System administrators and users with access to the Windows Group Policy Editor and an operating system that is Windows 2003 or newer can enable the policy to &#8220;Prevent access to 16-bit applications&#8221; in Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Application Compatibility&#8221;.</p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/group_policy_editor-500x326.jpg" alt="" title="group policy editor" width="500" height="326" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-22470" /></p><p>This setting has the consequence that 16-bit applications will not execute on the computer system which should not have an effect on most home users.</p><p>Users with operating systems prior to Windows 2003, Windows XP comes to mind, can alternatively create a new Windows Registry key to close the security vulnerability in the operating system.</p><p>This is done by navigating to the Registry key</p><p><code>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\AppCompat</code></p><p>and creating the new DWORD VDMDisallowed and setting the value of the Dword to 1.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/01/20/new-windows-vulnerability-uncovered-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>10</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>New Security Vulnerability Affects Windows Operating Systems</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/09/new-security-vulnerability-affects-windows-operating-systems/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/09/new-security-vulnerability-affects-windows-operating-systems/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:18:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=16177</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft yesterday released a security advisory that described a new security vulnerability affecting several Microsoft operating systems. The article, which was posted only a few hours after the release of security patches for this month&#8217;s patch-day affects the Microsoft Server Message Block (SMB) implementation. The operating systems that are affected by the new vulnerability are [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft yesterday released a security advisory that described a new security vulnerability affecting several Microsoft operating systems. The article, which was posted only a few hours after the release of security patches for this month&#8217;s patch-day affects the Microsoft Server Message Block (SMB) implementation. The operating systems that are affected by the new vulnerability are Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008 and the Windows 7 Release Candidate.</p><p>Operating systems that are not affected include Windows XP, Windows 7 final and Windows Server 2003. No patch is currently available to fix the vulnerability. Microsoft has published workarounds to protect the operating system from possible attacks.</p><p><span
id="more-16177"></span></p><blockquote><p>Disable SMB v2</p><p>To modify the registry key, perform the following steps:</p><p>Note Using Registry Editor incorrectly can cause serious problems that may require you to reinstall your operating system. Microsoft cannot guarantee that problems resulting from the incorrect use of Registry Editor can be solved. Use Registry Editor at your own risk. For information about how to edit the registry, view the &#8220;Changing Keys And Values&#8221; Help topic in Registry Editor (Regedit.exe) or view the &#8220;Add and Delete Information in the Registry&#8221; and &#8220;Edit Registry Data&#8221; Help topics in Regedt32.exe.</p><p>1. Click Start, click Run, type Regedit in the Open box, and then click OK.<br
/> 2. Locate and then click the following registry subkey:<br
/> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services<br
/> 3. Click LanmanServer.<br
/> 4. Click Parameters.<br
/> 5. Right-click to add a new DWORD (32 bit) Value.<br
/> 6. Enter smb2 in the Name data field, and change the Value data field to 0.<br
/> 7. Exit.<br
/> 8. Restart the &#8220;Server&#8221; service by performing one of the following:<br
/> - Open up the computer management MMC, navigate to Services and Applications, click Services, right-click the Server service name and click Restart. Answer Yes in the pop-up menu.<br
/> - From a command prompt and with administrator privileges, type net stop server and then net start server.</p><p>Impact of workaround. Host will not be able to communicate using SMB2.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>Block TCP ports 139 and 445 at the firewall</p><p>These ports are used to initiate a connection with the affected component. Blocking TCP ports 139 and 445 at the firewall will help protect systems that are behind that firewall from attempts to exploit this vulnerability. Microsoft recommends that you block all unsolicited inbound communication from the Internet to help prevent attacks that may use other ports. For more information about ports, see TCP and UDP Port Assignments.</p><p>Impact of Workaround: Several Windows services use the affected ports. Blocking connectivity to the ports may cause various applications or services to not function. Some of the applications or services that could be impacted are listed below:</p><p>• Applications that use SMB (CIFS)<br
/> • Applications that use mailslots or named pipes (RPC over SMB)<br
/> • Server (File and Print Sharing)<br
/> • Group Policy<br
/> • Net Logon<br
/> • Distributed File System (DFS)<br
/> • Terminal Server Licensing<br
/> • Print Spooler<br
/> • Computer Browser<br
/> • Remote Procedure Call Locator<br
/> • Fax Service<br
/> • Indexing Service<br
/> • Performance Logs and Alerts<br
/> • Systems Management Server<br
/> • License Logging Service</p></blockquote><p>Users that are running one of the operating systems that are affected by the vulnerability are encouraged to use one of the workarounds to protect their computer systems. More information are available at the Microsoft Security Advisory <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/975497.mspx">page</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/09/new-security-vulnerability-affects-windows-operating-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>January 2009 Microsoft Security Bulletin</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/14/january-2009-microsoft-security-bulletin/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/14/january-2009-microsoft-security-bulletin/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:49:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft security bulletin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft update]]></category> <category><![CDATA[security bulletin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[update windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows patch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vulnerability]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-update]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=9886</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft has the habit of releasing security patches on one Tuesday each month. Time critical patches can be delivered out of schedule but that did not happen that often in the past. Only one security bulletin has been released on the patch Tuesday in January 2009. Security Bullein MS09-001 has been rated critical for Windows [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has the habit of releasing security patches on one Tuesday each month. Time critical patches can be delivered out of schedule but that did not happen that often in the past. Only one security bulletin has been released on the patch Tuesday in January 2009. Security Bullein <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS09-001.mspx">MS09-001</a> has been rated critical for Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 respectively moderate for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.</p><p>The security bulletin resolves three vulnerabilities in Microsoft Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol which could allow remote code execution on affected systems. An attacker could run programs, create new user accounts and view, change or delete data on the computer system. It is <a
href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/archive/2009/01/13/january-2009-monthly-bulletin-release.aspx">interesting</a> to note that Windows 7 is affected as well even though it is not mentioned in the security bulletin.</p><p>The security vulnerability would be rated as moderate for the upcoming operating system which is why Microsoft will not provide a patch at the current time (They chose to only patch critical security vulnerabilities immediately). A patch will be released with the next public release of Windows 7.</p><p><span
id="more-9886"></span>Patches can be applied as usual through the various official update channels.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/01/14/january-2009-microsoft-security-bulletin/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
