<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; wikimedia</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/wikimedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Make Wikipedia more usable with Vector</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/make-wikipedia-more-usable-with-vector/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/make-wikipedia-more-usable-with-vector/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:48:31 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[skin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vector skin]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikimedia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=15043</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wikimedia recently conducted a study into how to make their projects, like Wikipedia, more usable and user friendly. The study highlighted a number of interesting points, like that many users had never been to Wikipedia&#8217;s homepage, instead finding articles through search engines. These points have helped steer development. One of the first things to come [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Usability_and_Experience_Study">Wikimedia recently conducted a study into how to make their projects, like Wikipedia, more usable and user friendly.</a> The study highlighted a number of interesting points, like that many users had never been to Wikipedia&#8217;s homepage, instead finding articles through search engines. These points have helped steer development.</p><p>One of the first things to come out of the Usability Project was a new skin. Wikipedia currently uses a skin called Monobook and has done so for over five years. Since Monobook was chosen, design trends have changed, as have web browsers and the way in which we surf.</p><p>The skin, called Vector, makes a number of changes. Vector gives the searchbar a more prominent location, declutters pages and looks much more modern. Basically, it makes it much easier to browse Wikipedia.</p><p><span
id="more-15043"></span>Registered users can choose a variety of skins and <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/24/become-a-wikipedia-poweruser/">&#8216;gadgets&#8217;</a>.</p><p>To enable the Vector skin, registered users need only go to the &#8216;Appearance&#8217; tab in the &#8216;<a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences">My Preferences</a>&#8216; page and select Vector.</p><p>The usability project has many other plans, and aims to make editing more accessible. This is just a first step, but in my opinion still a marked difference.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/08/05/make-wikipedia-more-usable-with-vector/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Wikipedia gets books and gets printed</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/27/wikipedia-gets-books-and-gets-printed/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/27/wikipedia-gets-books-and-gets-printed/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:26:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[books]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category> <category><![CDATA[opendocument]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pediapress]]></category> <category><![CDATA[reference]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikibooks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikimedia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=10815</guid> <description><![CDATA[Last year, the German Wikipedia was printed. Now, many Wikipedias worldwide – including the English Wikipedia – has given people the opportunity to compile a book of Wikipedia articles which can then be professionally printed or exported as a PDF or OpenDocument. Wikipedia has enabled the &#8216;Book&#8217; extension to MediaWiki, the content management system it [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, the German Wikipedia was printed. Now, many Wikipedias worldwide – including the English Wikipedia – has given people the opportunity to compile a book of Wikipedia articles which can then be professionally printed or exported as a PDF or OpenDocument.</p><p><a
href="http://www.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a> has enabled the &#8216;Book&#8217; extension to MediaWiki, the content management system it utilises. This adds a &#8216;add page&#8217; link to every page, allowing users to compile a book. This book can then be sorted by the user into chapters. Afterwards, it can be shared with other Wikipedians. Currently, only logged-in users can utilise this tool.</p><p>Wikipedia has a built-in rendering engine which will grabs the pages, fetches the images and parses them before they are given to the user as a PDF or OpenDocument text. The user can also use <a
href="http://pediapress.com">PediaPress</a> to have the book professionally bound and printed.</p><p><span
id="more-10815"></span>The &#8216;Book&#8217; extension has a number of features for &#8216;expert&#8217; users. For example, the user can elect to only include a certain version of an article. This could pose useful if the article being covered has reached &#8216;Featured&#8217; or &#8216;Good&#8217; quality, as they are sure information in the version which reached that standard is reliable and accurate.</p><p>Books can be made on any topic, or combinations of topics, on Wikipedia (or other projects with have enabled this extension, such as Wikibooks). There are some restrictions on what can be printed, as PediaPress are based in Germany so German law applies.</p><p>It is an amazing display of quite how big Wikipedia is.<a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Books/European_Union"> I made a book about the European Union</a>, comprising about 45 articles, and when I sent it to PediaPress, it totalled a massive 2444 pages (3 volumes!). I shan&#8217;t be buying this, as it will cost me about €80! Prices for smaller books start at $8.90 for 100 pages. A fraction of this is donated to the Wikimedia Foundation. These books are black and white and measure 8″ x 5.5″ (about 20cmx14cm).</p><p>The books (from the preview I&#8217;ve seen) and the PDFs are well laid out. The PDFs are all selectable and are easy to navigate. It also contains links to the images&#8217; pages. Amusingly, to maintain GFDL compatibility every editor to the article has to be mentioned! I, for example, are credited for writing a minute amount of the article on the Czech Republic.</p><p>I question how popular this will be though; as convenient as books may be, I would imagine institutions like schools would rather buy published textbooks than volunteer made ones.</p><p>It is worth emphasising that <a
href="http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page">Wikibooks</a> contains resources written as textbook entries, rather than articles. Perhaps that will be a practical application of PediaPress and this new move.</p><p><a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Books">More information is available on the Wikpedia help page.</a></p><p><a
href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/02/27/print-you-favorite-wikis-as-books-courtesy-of-wikipedia-and-pediapress/">TechCrunch has also covered this story</a>, but I simply found it through browsing Wikipedia!</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/27/wikipedia-gets-books-and-gets-printed/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Edit Wikipedia Articles Anonymously In The UK</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/09/edit-wikipedia-articles-anonymously-in-the-uk/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/09/edit-wikipedia-articles-anonymously-in-the-uk/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:48:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[antiproxy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[proxy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[uk]]></category> <category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikimedia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikipedia ban]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikipedia censorship]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikipedia proxy]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8853</guid> <description><![CDATA[You might have heard the news that several UK Internet Providers are restricting to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia after the Internet Watch Foundation identified the Wikipedia page of the Scorpions album Virgin Killer as a &#8220;potentially indecent image of a child&#8221;. Listing the page on the watchlist had the effect that several Internet Service Providers [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have heard the news that several UK Internet Providers are restricting to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia after the Internet Watch Foundation identified the Wikipedia page of the Scorpions album Virgin Killer as a &#8220;potentially indecent image of a child&#8221;. Listing the page on the watchlist had the effect that several Internet Service Providers included it automatically in their list of pages that are blocked in the UK.</p><p>A side-effect was that users of those Internet Service Providers in the United Kingdom were not able to modify other Wikipedia articles anonymously anymore.</p><p>It did not take long however before some users created a Greasemonkey script <a
href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/38239">Antiproxy 4 Wikipedia</a> so that users from the United Kingdom who cannot edit Wikipedia entries anonymously anymore have the opportunity to do so. A Firefox extension based on that Greasemonkey script has been designed in the meanwhile which can also be used to edit articles anonymously.</p><p><span
id="more-8853"></span>A more technical explanation can be found at <a
href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/online/isp/news/index.cfm?newsid=12291">Computerworld</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The measures applied caused the ISPs to redirect traffic for a significant portion of the UK&#8217;s Internet population through six proxy servers, which can log and filter the content that is available to the end user, Wikinews say. But the knock on effect resulted in Wikipedia being unable to distinguish UK users from one another by their IP address. That triggered Wikipedia&#8217;s anti-abuse mechanism, blocking all non-registered UK users from editing articles, according to the foundation.</p></blockquote><p>A search for Virgin Killer will reveal the album cover on many websites who are still available for UK users.</p><p><strong>Update:</strong> The Firefox extension has been taken down, it is no longer available on the Mozilla website. You can still use the userscript.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/09/edit-wikipedia-articles-anonymously-in-the-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Get Free Images, Video and Sound from Wikimedia Commons</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/24/get-free-images-video-and-sound-from-wikimedia-commons/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/24/get-free-images-video-and-sound-from-wikimedia-commons/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Music and Video]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free photos]]></category> <category><![CDATA[media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[stock photographs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[stock photos]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikimedia]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikimedia commons]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7837</guid> <description><![CDATA[When creating a presentation, a web design, a leaflet or a brochure, it is important to find suitable images to use. Whilst one option is to pay for stock photos to use under a restrictive licence, another option is to find free (gratis and libre) photos. Wikimedia Commons is the repository which Wikipedias and other [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When creating a presentation, a web design, a leaflet or a brochure, it is important to find suitable images to use. Whilst one option is to pay for stock photos to use under a restrictive licence, another option is to find free (gratis and libre) photos.<br
/> <a
href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page"><br
/> Wikimedia Commons</a> is the repository which Wikipedias and other Wikimedia projects use for the majority of their media. Wikimedia Commons has 3.5 million files: over 1 million more than the total amount of articles on the English Wikipedia.</p><p>Any media, whether that be music, a video or an image, on Wikimedia Commons can be commercially re-used and generally speaking the only major licensing limitation is that credit may have to be provided to the creator and copyright holder, if any.</p><p><span
id="more-7837"></span><a
href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/commons-logo-en.png" alt="" width="148" height="198" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7843" align="right" /></a>Wikimedia Commons has some amazing photography and has many useful illustrations, such as maps and diagrams. The vast majority of images on the site are categorised extremely well, and <a
href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:CommonsRoot">they can either be browsed through the categories</a> or use the substandard search tool available.</p><p>Many public domain recordings are on Wikimedia Commons and there&#8217;s a wide range of classical music and opera available for download. All audio/visual media is stored in the form of OGG files, which may have to be converted before use, but will be natively supported in future versions of Firefox. Some visual recordings, such as that of <a
href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charles_Lindbergh_flight_to_Brussels.ogg">&#8220;The Spirit of St. Louis&#8221;</a>, are also available.</p><p>Most media on Wikimedia Commons are either public domain, Creative Commons, under the GFDL or licensed under another free licence, which makes it suitable for re-use.</p><p><a
href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trebinje_River.jpg"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/800px-trebinje_river-500x375.jpg" align="center" alt="" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7844" /></a><br
/> © Goran Andjelic under the <a
href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GFDL</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/24/get-free-images-video-and-sound-from-wikimedia-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <enclosure
url="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charles_Lindbergh_flight_to_Brussels.ogg" length="39002" type="audio/ogg" /> </item> </channel> </rss>
