<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; wga</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/wga/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Remove WGA</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/10/remove-wga-2/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/10/remove-wga-2/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[remove wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga removal]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga remove]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wgalogon.dll]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wgatray.exe]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-genuine-advantage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[winlogon.exe]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/10/remove-wga-2/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Remove WGA is a small tool that will check if the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications Tool is installed on a computer system which is a tool created by Microsoft to check if a Windows operating system is genuine. What many users do not understand is that the check if an operating system is genuine is [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remove WGA is a small tool that will check if the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications Tool is installed on a computer system which is a tool created by Microsoft to check if a Windows operating system is genuine. What many users do not understand is that the check if an operating system is genuine is executed at every system boot. One would think that a sporadic check or one initial check would be enough. Apparently not as the tool checks the operating system at every boot and connects to a Microsoft server to exchange data.</p><p>It should also be noted that the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications Tool is different from the Windows Genuine Advantage Validation tool. The former is only used to exchange data with a Microsoft server while the latter will perform the validation itself.</p><p>Remove WGA will only remove the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications Tool if the tool is running on the computer system and only if the user selects so.</p><p><span
id="more-10462"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/remove_wga-500x111.jpg" alt="remove wga" title="remove wga" width="500" height="111" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-10461" /></p><p>The Remove WGA software program scans the computer system and report its findings back to the user. It will tell the user if the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications Tool is active on the computer system. To be precise it will check if wgalogon.dll is loaded into the winlogon.exe process.</p><p>Remove WGA will provide the means to remove the Microsoft WGA Notification Tool from the system which will essentially remove wgatray.exe and wgalogon.dll. A click on yes will remove the wga notification tool.</p><p>The <a
href="http://www.softpedia.com/get/Tweak/Uninstallers/RemoveWGA.shtml">tool</a> is only available for download on various download portals.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/10/remove-wga-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>33</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows Vista SP1 WGA Changes</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/10/windows-vista-sp1-wga-changes/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/10/windows-vista-sp1-wga-changes/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[service pack 1]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-vista]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/10/windows-vista-sp1-wga-changes/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Windows Vista Service Pack 1 is almost there and Microsoft kept their word related to changes to the WGA, Windows Genuine Advantage, system currently in place in Windows Vista. There are actually two different scenarios in place, the first is called Reduced Functionality Mode which Vista will start in if the user does not activate the product in time. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Vista Service Pack 1 is almost there and Microsoft kept their word related to changes to the WGA, Windows Genuine Advantage, system currently in place in Windows Vista. There are actually two different scenarios in place, the first is called Reduced Functionality Mode which Vista will start in if the user does not activate the product in time.</p><p>The second is if a WGA check fails which will make Vista run in Non-Genuine Mode. Both modes impose certain penalties upon the user like logging him off after an hour or disabling features like Aero or Readyboost. <a
href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/sp1-brings-with-it-a-softer-gentler-naggier-wga-day-3/1253">Adrian</a> posted the changes that users will face if they have Service Pack 1 installed.</p><p>The good news is that both modes described above are gone. Users will not be logged off automatically anymore which is great. Microsoft however decided to change tactics and nag the user to death &#8211; eh registration / activation &#8211; instead. Users will experience the following if their Vista installation fails the WGA check or if they fail to activate Vista in time.</p><p><span
id="more-3180"></span><br
/><blockquote>A nag screen to activate at logon that cannot be dismissed for 15 seconds.<br
/> Every hour the desktop background is switched to black (it can be changed back, but after an hour it’s set to black again).<br
/> Activation dialogs and balloon dialogs appear regularly.<br
/> Optional Windows Updates aren’t delivered.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/10/windows-vista-sp1-wga-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows Genuine Advantage Validation Cracked by Eth0</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/31/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-by-eth0/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/31/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-by-eth0/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:38:02 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[eth0]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga crack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-genuine-advantage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/31/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-by-eth0/</guid> <description><![CDATA[The group Eth0 has released a new version of their crack for Windows Genuine Advantage Validation today. This new release updates several WGA files with patched versions so that every Windows system, even those that are not legit, can use Windows Update and the Microsoft Download Center with all options. That means that non-legit Microsoft operating systems will appear to be legit to Microsoft.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article has been removed.</p><p><span
id="more-2690"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/31/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-by-eth0/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>24</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows Genuine Advantage Validation cracked.. Again</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/09/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-again/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/09/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-again/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:58:39 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[eth0]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga crack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-genuine-advantage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/09/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-again/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I'm really curious why companies try to enforce DRM like protections into their products even though they should know that this is on a large scale only affecting the customers who actually purchase their products. This is in my opinion counter productive, but lets analyze this a little bit further.
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really curious why companies try to enforce DRM like protections into their products even though they should know that this is on a large scale only affecting the customers who actually purchase their products. This is in my opinion counter productive, but lets analyze this a little bit further.</p><p>Users who purchase Microsoft Windows have to activate and update it. Users who download it from P2P get it activated and with the latest updates installed. What&#8217;s wrong with this picture ? Oh yes, the first batch of users who actually paid for the product are having a less comfortable version.</p><p>They have to activate the system and will have to do it again if they change important hardware in the system. They have to use Windows Updates to update their system after the purchase as well.</p><p><span
id="more-2103"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/09/windows-genuine-advantage-validation-cracked-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Validation removed from Internet Explorer 7</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/06/validation-removed-from-internet-explorer-7/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/06/validation-removed-from-internet-explorer-7/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:21:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ie]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet explorer 7]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-genuine-advantage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/06/validation-removed-from-internet-explorer-7/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft must be desperate. That was my first thought when I read that Microsoft made the decision to remove the Windows Genuine Advantage validation check from the download and installation of Internet Explorer 7. I was not able to come up with any other explanation why they decided to turn around 180 degrees and head for the other direction.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft must be desperate. That was my first thought when I read that Microsoft made the decision to remove the Windows Genuine Advantage validation check from the download and installation of Internet Explorer 7. I was not able to come up with any other explanation why they decided to turn around 180 degrees and head for the other direction.</p><p>Their reasoning is that they removed the WGA validation to &#8216;protect the entire Windows ecosystem&#8217;. We all know that Microsoft started to integrate Internet Explorer heavily into the system to dominate the thriving Netscape browser which turned out to be a successful marketing decision.</p><p>I personally think it is about market share and the hopes that Internet Explorer 7 is able to get most of the Internet Explorer 6 users to upgrade to it.</p><p><span
id="more-2091"></span>Microsoft enabled the Toolbar in Internet Explorer 7 by default which is in my opinion a good move. Many users got confused by the new looks of the browser.</p><p><strong>Read More</strong></p><p><a
href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2007/10/04/internet-explorer-7-update.aspx">IE Blog</a><br
/> via PC Doctor</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/10/06/validation-removed-from-internet-explorer-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why WGA and DRM will fail</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/26/why-wga-and-drm-will-fail/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/26/why-wga-and-drm-will-fail/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 09:13:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Music and Video]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Music Industry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[drm]]></category> <category><![CDATA[genuine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[why drm will fail]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/26/why-wga-and-drm-will-fail/</guid> <description><![CDATA[We had two reports last week that gave us the reason why DRM and WGA will fail in the long run. The first story was about Google Video who sold videos with DRM and closed down their service leaving everyone who purchased those videos standing in the rain because it will not be possible to play those videos after Google Video shuts down.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had two reports last week that gave us the reason why DRM and WGA will fail in the long run. The first story was about Google Video who sold videos with DRM and closed down their service leaving everyone who purchased those videos standing in the rain because it will not be possible to play those videos after Google Video shuts down.</p><p>Great news for customers who wasted precious time selecting and buying videos only to find out that their purchased videos will stop working soon. It is even more important that it was not a small company who had to shutdown their service but a billion dollar company.</p><p>This in turn means that it could happen to anyone who purchases products &#8211; media normally such as music or videos &#8211; that have some sort of DRM integrated in the data.</p><p>We already see a shift away from DRM towards watermarked media files which is definitely a step in the right direction. Better of course does not mean perfect but it is heading towards a good direction.</p><p><span
id="more-1922"></span>The other occurence that involved some sort of DRM was when Microsofts WGA servers went down flagging all genuine Windows Vista installations as invalid if a WGA check was performed on those systems.</p><p>So, updating your system had the result that your formerly validated Windows Vista was flagged as not validated which meant that the updates could not be installed.</p><p>Microsoft was able to fix the issue after two days and users are again able to validate their system to be able to download updates for it. Some users claim that Windows Update is not working anymore after re-validating their system which can only be attributed to this process.</p><p>The bottom line is this: It is not safe to say that you will be allowed to keep data that you purchased. It can happen that you will lose that data without being able to interfere at all. Would you buy a car, a CD or DVD if someone told you that it could happen that you would not be able to play them in the future if the producer decided to stop distributing them ?</p><p>I know that it is quite comfortable to download music and videos from the Internet but I personally think that it is not worth it at all. You will lose what you bought in the long run, that is my prediction.</p><p>Even if you purchase a product that uses DRM, WGA (replace with other acronyms that will surely replace these in the future)</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/26/why-wga-and-drm-will-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Vista to automatically revoke activation ?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/12/vista-to-automatically-revoke-activation/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/12/vista-to-automatically-revoke-activation/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:30:33 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[activation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[revoke-activation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-vista]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/12/vista-to-automatically-revoke-activation/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I came upon a very interesting post on the vista knowledgebase blog where the author was describing a very unusual behavior that he experienced with Windows Vista. She apparently was running a legit, fully activated copy of Windows Vista and decided to install the upcoming mmorpg game 9 Dragons which is currently in Open Beta phase.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came upon a very interesting post on the <a
href="http://windows-server-training.com/windows-vista-activation-goes-too-far/" title="vista activation" target="_blank">vista knowledgebase</a> blog where the author was describing a very unusual behavior that he experienced with Windows Vista. She apparently was running a legit, fully activated copy of Windows Vista and decided to install the upcoming mmorpg game 9 Dragons which is currently in Open Beta phase.</p><p>After installing the game and playing for a while a message from Windows Vista popped up minimzing the game in the course of action. The message that appeared told her that her copy of Windows Vista was not genuine. She tried to reactivate the operating system but it would fail although she would supply the correct key that was accepted before.</p><p><span
id="more-1194"></span> After uninstalling the 9 Dragons game the activation was again accepted and Windows Vista was activated again.</p><p>If this story really holds true it is a remarkable one. Why on earth would Windows Vista revoke the activation &#8211; this would be the main questions that would have to be answered.</p><p>This pretty looks like a way for Microsoft to revoke the activation on systems that run known pirated keys or install software that would probably try to interfere with Windows Vista core processes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/12/vista-to-automatically-revoke-activation/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Update Windows without Microsoft</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/11/update-windows-without-microsoft/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/11/update-windows-without-microsoft/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:04:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[autopatcher]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[patches]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-2000]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-xp]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/11/update-windows-without-microsoft/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I recently received an email from one of my readers who asked if there would be a secure way to update a Windows XP installation that already had service pack 2 installed with the latest patches issues by Microsoft in the months after the second service pack was released. His main concerns were about WGA, Windows Genuine Advantage. He did not like the fact that data was sent from his computer to Microsoft.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently received an email from one of my readers who asked if there would be a secure way to update a Windows XP installation that already had service pack 2 installed with the latest patches issues by Microsoft in the months after the second service pack was released. His main concerns were about WGA, Windows Genuine Advantage. He did not like the fact that data was sent from his computer to Microsoft.</p><p>Fortunately for him there is indeed an easy method to upgrade Windows XP without contacting a Microsoft server at all. This of course is only half the truth, some software products like IE7 and Windows Media Player 11 contact Microsoft during installation. You can either use one of the techniques described in my posts to avoid this or choose to not install those programs.</p><p><span
id="more-1191"></span> The current <a
href="http://www.autopatcher.com/" title="autopatcher">Autopatcher</a> file size is about 350 megabytes in size for Windows XP and can be downloaded from the Autopatcher homepage. I suggest you use a torrent or a mirror to ease the load on the main servers. You also find versions for Windows 2000 and 2003.</p><p>Download the full Autopatcher release for your language and after that the smaller update for January. Install both on your computer and run the application afterwards. The difference between full and lite versions is that some third party products (e.g. Java from Sun) have been removed from the package, all Microsoft patches are still inside.</p><p>Autopatcher scans your system and displays a list of patches that could be installed. The following categories exist:</p><ol><li>Microsoft Windows &#8211; Critital Updates</li><li>Microsoft Windows &#8211; Recommended Updates</li><li>Microsoft Windows &#8211; Updated Components</li><li>Microsoft Windows Genuine Advantage</li><li>Windows Addons</li><li>Registry Tweaks</li></ol><p>The first three are automatically (partially) selected. I would advise to check the patches manually and remove everything that seems unnecessary. Click on Update after you have made your selections and Autopatcher will update your system.</p><p>Autopatcher is great if you have to update more than one operating system. Instead of downloading all the patches several times you do it once. Great time saver.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/11/update-windows-without-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Microsoft admits 1% false positives rate by WGA checks</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:44:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga-checks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-genuine-advantage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-xp]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft recently published updated figures about their Windows Genuine Advantage  protection that tries to hinder users of illegal versions of Microsoft Windows to update their system with some of the software that can be downloaded from the microsoft homepage. Software like the new Internet Explorer 7 or the Windows Media Player can only be downloaded after a successful WGA check. The download and installation will be denied if a check fails.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft recently published updated figures about their Windows Genuine Advantage  protection that tries to hinder users of illegal versions of Microsoft Windows to update their system with some of the software that can be downloaded from the microsoft homepage. Software like the new Internet Explorer 7 or the Windows Media Player can only be downloaded after a successful WGA check. The download and installation will be denied if a check fails.</p><p>It was always known that there would be false positives and the new figures give us a clearer picture on the scale of the <a
href="http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2007/01/8690.ars" title="wga false positives" target="_blank">false positive rate</a>. About 114 million systems failed the WGA check since the introduction of those checks and Microsoft admitted that 1% of those were false positives meaning that legit Windows systems failed the WGA check.</p><p><span
id="more-1136"></span>While under 1% does not seem that much it it does look much in absolute figures: 1% of 114 million checks means that 1.14 million systems failed the check although this should not have happened. I can&#8217;t figure out how the source comes to the conclusion that the absolute number would be 5 million false positives because you clearly have to use the failed checks for the figure and not the total amount of checks which is 500 million.</p><p>It is nevertheless a huge number and Microsoft should do everything to reduce it by optimizing the script that performs the checks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Things to check before switching to Vista Part 3</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/09/things-to-check-before-switching-to-vista-part-3/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/09/things-to-check-before-switching-to-vista-part-3/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 08:32:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[kill-switch]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-genuine-advantage]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/09/things-to-check-before-switching-to-vista-part-3/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Welcome to the third part in my Things to check before switching to Vista series. The last two articles dealt with possible hardware and software incompatibilities and ways to check whether your hard- and software would run in Windows Vista. It is imminent to check this before you make the switch. Just imagine that you make the switch and a program that you run on a daily basis will not install or run properly.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the third part in my Things to check before switching to Vista series. The last two articles dealt with possible hardware and software incompatibilities and ways to check whether your hard- and software would run in Windows Vista. It is imminent to check this before you make the switch. Just imagine that you make the switch and a program that you run on a daily basis will not install or run properly.</p><p>Today we are going to take a look at a function of Vista that most people could live without: WGA. You do know that XP introduced WGA which stands for Windows Genuine Advantage. You can still run XP without problems even if the WGA check should fail. A nagscreen is the only thing that appears afterwards and it is no problem to disable it. Vista will introduce a new level. If the WGA check fails Vista will reduce the functionality.</p><p><span
id="more-991"></span>Vista will only run in Reduced Function Mode and many features will not be available anymore:</p><blockquote><p>By choosing <q>Access your computer with reduced functionality,</q> the default Web browser will be started and the user will be presented with an option to purchase a new product key. There is no start menu, no desktop icons, and the desktop background is changed to black. The Web browser will fully function and Internet connectivity will not be blocked. After one hour, the system will log the user out without warning. It will not shut down the machine, and the user can log back in. Note: This is different from the Windows XP RFM experience, which limits screen resolution, colors, sounds and other features.</p></blockquote><p>A crippled system which should not be that of a problem if only pirated copies of Vista were affected. We all know that this will not be the case. We all read about legit copies of XP who failed WGA checks with no one being able to fix this problem. It is most likely that at least some legit copies of Vista will be affected by this phenomenon as well.</p><p>The new WGA could indeed do something good for the growth of free operating systems like Linux. The question that you have to ask yourself if you face such a situation: Do I want to buy Vista for hundreds of dollars or do I want to try a free operating system instead and save the money ? Some will buy Vista because they want to play the latest games but all the others, who are not that interested in games but working with their pc &#8211; will they buy Vista ? I doubt so.</p><p>A great opportunity for Linux.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/09/things-to-check-before-switching-to-vista-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Will Microsoft ever learn ?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/07/will-microsoft-ever-learn/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/07/will-microsoft-ever-learn/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:22:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[activation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[key]]></category> <category><![CDATA[key-management-service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[kms]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[product-key]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/07/will-microsoft-ever-learn/</guid> <description><![CDATA[According to the website apcmag "pirates" were able to crack the vista activation server. As you all know every Windows Vista edition has to be activated, even the enterprise editions which was not the case in Windows XP. Imagine a company with thousands of computers all running Windows Vista. It would probably take some time to activate each on its own. The clever folks at Microsoft wanted to make it more comfortable for their business clients and created the so called Key Management Service.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the website <a
target="_blank" title="apcmag" href="http://apcmag.com/pirates_crack_vista_activation_server.htm">apcmag</a> &#8220;pirates&#8221; were able to crack the vista activation server. As you all know every Windows Vista edition has to be activated, even the enterprise editions which was not the case in Windows XP. Imagine a company with thousands of computers all running Windows Vista. It would probably take some time to activate each on its own. The clever folks at Microsoft wanted to make it more comfortable for their business clients and created the so called Key Management Service.</p><p>The KMS works as a activation hub for all computers connected to it which means that all Vista editions can be activated at once using the server. To counter abuse the activation is only valid for 180 days and everything needs to be re-activated in that period. The software, scheduled for release next year, apparently got into wrong hands and &#8220;pirates&#8221; were able to tweak the Key Management Service that way that it would activate the Vista edition without connecting to the Microsoft Activation server at all.</p><p><span
id="more-985"></span>Everything a Pirate needs is now available freely, though illegally, on the internet. You may download a full retail version of Windows Vista with some CD keys and you may download the Key Management Service to activate the edition without Microsoft ever knowing.</p><p>This will only work with Business and Enterprise editions and the time limit is still active. I personally think that it is only a matter of time until those nasty &#8220;pirates&#8221; create a version that activates Vista completely. Another drawback is that you will still be subject to WGA checks if you use services such as Windows Update to update your operating system. Again, only a matter of time for this as well.</p><p>Will Vista be less copied than XP ? I don&#8217;t think so. Sure activation and WGA could make this happen but it seems that the &#8220;pirates&#8221; are on step ahead, again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/12/07/will-microsoft-ever-learn/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Block windows update from automatic updating to IE7</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/17/block-windows-update-from-automatic-updating-to-ie7/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/17/block-windows-update-from-automatic-updating-to-ie7/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:52:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[automatic-updates]]></category> <category><![CDATA[block-ie7]]></category> <category><![CDATA[block-internet-explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[block-wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[registry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-update]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/17/block-windows-update-from-automatic-updating-to-ie7/</guid> <description><![CDATA[It seems that Microsoft added the upgrade to Internet Explorer 7 to the automatic upgrade feature of Windows XP. Automatic Updates will notify the user that a new version is ready for download giving the user the option to Install, Don't Install and Ask Me Later. It seems a pressing matter to Microsoft to get a large basis of Internet Explorer 7 users in a hurry to regain lost grounds in the waging browser war against Opera and Firefox.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Microsoft added the upgrade to Internet Explorer 7 to the automatic upgrade feature of Windows XP. Automatic Updates will notify the user that a new version is ready for download giving the user the option to Install, Don&#8217;t Install and Ask Me Later. It seems a pressing matter to Microsoft to get a large basis of Internet Explorer 7 users in a hurry to regain lost grounds in the waging browser war against Opera and Firefox.</p><p>Many users that use Firefox or Opera do not care about the new Internet Explorer 7 &#8211; which means they probably want to get rid of this message altogether. Blocking windows update from automatic updating to IE7 can be done by changing one registry key in the registry. All you need to do is create a new registry file and import it to the registry</p><p><span
id="more-920"></span></p><p>Create a new textfile, paste the following lines of code into it and save it with the extension .reg</p><p><code>Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00</p><p>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Setup\7.0]<br
/> "DoNotAllowIE70"=dword:00000001</code></p><p>This creates a new registry key that blocks the automatic update to IE7, you will not see the annoying windows that popups again. Simply change the registry key from 1 to 0 if you want to see the window again to update to the new IE7.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/17/block-windows-update-from-automatic-updating-to-ie7/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Install Windows Media Player 11 without WGA check</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/10/31/install-windows-media-player-11-without-wga-check/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/10/31/install-windows-media-player-11-without-wga-check/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:16:54 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga check]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows media player]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wmp]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/10/31/install-windows-media-player-11-without-wga-check/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Windows Media Player 11 for XP has been released and Microsoft decided to add a WGA check to the installation routine. Once you double-click the executable that you downloaded the tool asks for a WGA check and will not continue the installation until it was checked whether Microsoft thinks your Windows installation is legit or not. We heard about users that had problems with those WGA checks and could not install software that performed checks although they had a legit system.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
target="_blank" title="windows media player 11 download" href="http://www.ghacks.net/2006/10/31/windows-media-player-11-download/">Windows Media Player 11 for XP</a> has been released and Microsoft decided to add a WGA check to the installation routine. Once you double-click the executable that you downloaded the tool asks for a WGA check and will not continue the installation until it was checked whether Microsoft thinks your Windows installation is legit or not. We heard about users that had problems with those WGA checks and could not install software that performed checks although they had a legit system.</p><p><span
id="more-884"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/10/31/install-windows-media-player-11-without-wga-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>98</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Download everything from Microsoft without WGA Check</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/04/download-everything-from-microsoft-without-wga-check/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/04/download-everything-from-microsoft-without-wga-check/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 10:29:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga check]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/04/download-everything-from-microsoft-without-wga-check/</guid> <description><![CDATA[When you want to download a file from Microsoft a WGA (windows genuine advantage) check is performed. Microsoft installs a small piece of software on your computer that contacts the Microsoft server and checks for validity. If the test fails you will not be able to download the file(s). The following method gives you the ability to download every file from Microsoft without a WGA check.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you want to download a file from Microsoft a WGA (windows genuine advantage) check is performed. Microsoft installs a small piece of software on your computer that contacts the Microsoft server and checks for validity. If the test fails you will not be able to download the file(s). This is extremely frustrating especially if you have a system that is legit.</p><p>The method that was described below is no longer working and has therefor been removed from this server.<br
/> <span
id="more-769"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/04/download-everything-from-microsoft-without-wga-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>256</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>RemoveWga 1.2 removes the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications tool</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/29/removewga-12-removes-the-windows-genuine-advantage-notifications-tool/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/29/removewga-12-removes-the-windows-genuine-advantage-notifications-tool/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:36:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[remove wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/29/removewga-12-removes-the-windows-genuine-advantage-notifications-tool/</guid> <description><![CDATA[RemoveWga has been released in a new version today and I thought it would be a nice idea to post a quick article and download link about this nice anti wga tool. RemoveWga enables you to remove the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications which sends data to Microsoft regulary. The question is why would the wga [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RemoveWga has been released in a new version today and I thought it would be a nice idea to post a quick article and download link about this nice anti wga tool. RemoveWga enables you to remove the Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications which sends data to Microsoft regulary. The question is why would the wga notifications tool do this if Microsoft once verified that you are running a legit copy of windows ? There is no possible reason that I can think of, enter RemoveWGA.<br
/> The following items have been changed in the new RemoveWGA 1.2 utility:</p><blockquote><p>- Now uses the &#8220;RunOnce&#8221; registry entry instead of &#8220;Run&#8221; (starts sooner)<br
/> - Added a clean removal procedure for the final WGA notification update<br
/> (The final WGA notification is now removed cleanly without any BSOD)<br
/> - If every removal procedure fails (possibly for futur WGA versions), offers the brutal removal procedure</p></blockquote><p><span
id="more-668"></span>RemoveWGA only disables the notification part of Windows Genuine Advantage, it does not touch the validation part. No downloads need the notification part as of now, they only check the validation part.</p><p>Please read &#8220;Preventing the prompt to reinstall WGA notification update&#8221; if you want to prevent that windows urges you to update the nofitication part of wga again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/29/removewga-12-removes-the-windows-genuine-advantage-notifications-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Pirated Keys only cause 80% of all WGA failures</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/04/pirated-keys-only-cause-80-of-all-wga-failures/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/04/pirated-keys-only-cause-80-of-all-wga-failures/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:41:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga failures]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/04/pirated-keys-only-cause-80-of-all-wga-failures/</guid> <description><![CDATA[You all know windows genuine advantage (wga) which checks if you are running a legit copy of windows xp on every startup and when you try to download certain tools and updates from the microsoft website. Microsoft confirmed that only 80% of all WGA failures are caused by pirated keys which means that about 20% are not caused by pirated keys.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all know windows genuine advantage (wga) which checks if you are running a legit copy of windows xp on every startup and when you try to download certain tools and updates from the microsoft website. Microsoft <a
target="_blank" href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;articleId=9001559">confirmed</a> that only 80% of all WGA failures are caused by pirated keys which means that about 20% are not caused by pirated keys.</p><p>I think this is pretty interesting. Ed Bott from <a
target="_blank" href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/ms-20-of-wga-failures-not-caused-by-pirated-keys/89">Zdnet</a> tried to get an answer about the other 20% and recieved an evasive one stating that Microsoft would not be able to share specifics and that those mostly resulted from &#8220;activities such as various forms of tampering and unauthorized OEM installations.&#8221; The only conclusion that I can come up with is that there is most likely a large number of false positives and Microsoft does it´s best to keep this number secret.</p><p><span
id="more-606"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/04/pirated-keys-only-cause-80-of-all-wga-failures/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Remove WGA</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/06/24/remove-wga/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/06/24/remove-wga/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 05:16:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[remove wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/06/24/remove-wga/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Windows Genuine Advantage Notification is checking if you are running a legit copy of windows on every boot, even though it might have already verified this on the first run. This is an annoying behaviour of WGA Notificiation which can be countered by running this sweet little freeware called Remove WGA.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Genuine Advantage Notification is checking if you are running a legit copy of windows on every boot, even though it might have already verified this on the first run. This is an annoying behaviour of WGA Notificiation which can be countered by running this sweet little freeware called Remove WGA.</p><p>Remove WGA gives you information if WGA Notification is running on your system and allows you to disable the wga tool from your system. It is also able to run silently on your system and become active when the WGA Notificiation becomes active on your system as well.</p><p><span
id="more-583"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/06/24/remove-wga/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>9</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
