<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; wga-checks</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/wga-checks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Microsoft admits 1% false positives rate by WGA checks</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:44:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga-checks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-genuine-advantage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-xp]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Microsoft recently published updated figures about their Windows Genuine Advantage  protection that tries to hinder users of illegal versions of Microsoft Windows to update their system with some of the software that can be downloaded from the microsoft homepage. Software like the new Internet Explorer 7 or the Windows Media Player can only be downloaded after a successful WGA check. The download and installation will be denied if a check fails.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft recently published updated figures about their Windows Genuine Advantage  protection that tries to hinder users of illegal versions of Microsoft Windows to update their system with some of the software that can be downloaded from the microsoft homepage. Software like the new Internet Explorer 7 or the Windows Media Player can only be downloaded after a successful WGA check. The download and installation will be denied if a check fails.</p><p>It was always known that there would be false positives and the new figures give us a clearer picture on the scale of the <a
href="http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2007/01/8690.ars" title="wga false positives" target="_blank">false positive rate</a>. About 114 million systems failed the WGA check since the introduction of those checks and Microsoft admitted that 1% of those were false positives meaning that legit Windows systems failed the WGA check.</p><p><span
id="more-1136"></span>While under 1% does not seem that much it it does look much in absolute figures: 1% of 114 million checks means that 1.14 million systems failed the check although this should not have happened. I can&#8217;t figure out how the source comes to the conclusion that the absolute number would be 5 million false positives because you clearly have to use the failed checks for the figure and not the total amount of checks which is 500 million.</p><p>It is nevertheless a huge number and Microsoft should do everything to reduce it by optimizing the script that performs the checks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/01/25/microsoft-admits-1-false-positives-rate-by-wga-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Avoid Microsoft Software WGA Checks</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/14/avoid-microsoft-software-wga-checks/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/14/avoid-microsoft-software-wga-checks/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bypass wga checks]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[wga-checks]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/14/avoid-microsoft-software-wga-checks/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I wrote an article some days ago about a way to download the latest Microsoft software from Microsoft.com without wga, windows genuine advantage, checks. Several users had problems installing the software afterwards because a second check was performed during the installation of the software. It did not install if the check failed and there was not way to prevent the check from happening. Until now..]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article some days ago about a way to download the latest Microsoft software from Microsoft.com without wga, windows genuine advantage, checks. Several users had problems installing the software afterwards because a second check was performed during the installation of the software. It did not install if the check failed and there was not way to prevent the check from happening.</p><p><span
id="more-793"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/09/14/avoid-microsoft-software-wga-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
