<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; vista-key</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/vista-key/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>How to bypass Vista activation</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/13/how-to-bypass-vista-activation/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/13/how-to-bypass-vista-activation/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:23:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bypass-vista-activation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista-activation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista-key]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-vista]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/13/how-to-bypass-vista-activation/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Imagine a race. A race between Microsoft and Crackers. Whenever Microsoft releases a new operating system that they say is absolutely secure and uncrackable some crackers find a way after days, weeks or even months. Vista was designed to be the first operating system that would not be copied en masse because of the way it had to be activated to function after a trial period. The first workarounds popped up pretty quickly buying time for the one real workaround to rule them all.
The weakness was first discovered by the famous (underground) group Paradox which discovered a way to emulate so called "Royality OEM2" which require no activation at all. Those special OEM versions are only issued to major computer manufacturers such as Dell and Asus to take the hassle of activating the operating system away from their clients. These manufacturers embed license information into their hardware products which is equivalent to a online or phone registration.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a race. A race between Microsoft and Crackers. Whenever Microsoft releases a new operating system that they say is absolutely secure and uncrackable some crackers find a way after days, weeks or even months. Vista was designed to be the first operating system that would not be copied en masse because of the way it had to be activated to function after a trial period. The first workarounds popped up pretty quickly buying time for the one real workaround to rule them all.</p><p>The weakness was first discovered by the famous (underground) group Paradox which discovered a way to emulate so called &#8220;Royality OEM2&#8243; which require no activation at all. Those special OEM versions are only issued to major computer manufacturers such as Dell and Asus to take the hassle of activating the operating system away from their clients. These manufacturers embed license information into their hardware products which is equivalent to a online or phone registration.</p><p><span
id="more-1297"></span></p><p>This is called system-locked pre-installation 2.0 (SLP 2.0) and it consists of three key elements: (taken directly from the Paradox info file)</p><ul><li>The OEM&#8217;s hardware-embedded BIOS ACPI_SLIC information signed by Microsoft.</li><li>A certificate issued by Microsoft that corresponds to the specific ACPI_SLIC information.</li><li>A special type of product key that corresponds to the installed edition of Windows Vista.</li></ul><p><em><br
/> &#8220;If all three elements match Windows Vista&#8217;s licensing mechanism considers the given installation a valid system-locked pre-activated copy (that does not require any additional product activation procedures).&#8221;</em></p><p>Which means they had to create a tool that would emulate an SLP 2.0 system fulfilling all three key elements. This process introduced by Paradox could be described as rather complex for the average user.</p><p>Thankfully a group called Clony created a one click activation from this information. The process would be the following:</p><ul><li>Install RTM or Retail Vista without product key</li><li>Execute a single file and follow the instructions</li><li>Reboot Windows Vista</li></ul><p>Now this does not sound complicated at all, does it ? In case you are wondering where to get those activation files. I do not want to link directly to them because it could mean serious trouble.</p><p>Please rest assured that this method to bypass Vista activation does not tinker with your bios at all. It is a pure software emulation of a OEM bios.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/13/how-to-bypass-vista-activation/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>8</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Method to Bruteforce Vista key a hoax &#8211; kinda</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/03/method-to-bruteforce-vista-key-a-hoax-kinda/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/03/method-to-bruteforce-vista-key-a-hoax-kinda/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bruteforce vista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista keygen]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista-key]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-vista]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/03/method-to-bruteforce-vista-key-a-hoax-kinda/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yesterday I was writing about a method to get a working Windows Vista key by bruteforcing. The method would generate random keys and check them locally for validity. If the local check would be successful the user had to try and use the key to activate his version of Windows Vista. This could of course still be rejected if someone else did already use the key to activate his version.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I was writing about a method to get a working Windows Vista key by bruteforcing. The method would generate random keys and check them locally for validity. If the local check would be successful the user had to try and use the key to activate his version of Windows Vista. This could of course still be rejected if someone else did already use the key to activate his version.</p><p>The author of the keygen admitted today that the method that he posted was a hoax. The problem is not that it is not possible to create a valid Windows Vista key &#8211; it lies in the fact that it simply takes to long to generate a working key that can be used to activate Windows Vista online. This means, the method is working but not very practicable.</p><p><span
id="more-1261"></span> The question remains why the author admitted the hoax just one day after publishing the method. He admitted in the forum that he did not like the prospect of a lawsuit which is totally understandable. Thanks Irish and Andre for letting me know about this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/03/method-to-bruteforce-vista-key-a-hoax-kinda/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Got no Vista key ? Bruteforce one !</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/02/got-no-vista-key-bruteforce-one/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/02/got-no-vista-key-bruteforce-one/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista-brute-force]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista-bruteforce]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista-bruteforce-keys]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista-key]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-vista]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/02/got-no-vista-key-bruteforce-one/</guid> <description><![CDATA[As if it would not be easy enough to circumvent the activation of Windows Vista some clever guys managed to bruteforce working Windows Vista keys. Bruteforcing simply means that the script is testing about 20000 keys per hour changing the product key to a possible working one if one is found. I'm not sure why Microsoft has no protection against this kind of attack but they surely will add some sort of protection soon - something in the like of banning IPs that check more than x keys per minute.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if it would not be easy enough to circumvent the activation of Windows Vista some clever guys managed to bruteforce working Windows Vista keys. Bruteforcing simply means that the script is testing about 20000 keys per hour changing the product key to a possible working one if one is found. I&#8217;m not sure why Microsoft has no protection against this kind of attack but they surely will add some sort of protection soon &#8211; something in the like of banning IPs that check more than x keys per minute.</p><p>It seems that the process requires to replace the Software License Manager for Windows Vista &#8211; slmgr.vbs &#8211; with an altered version that makes the process possible. It is currently not possible to download the needed files from the website that published the method first. The forum does not accept new registrations at this point and the main page contains only a summary of the process without a download link.</p><p><span
id="more-1255"></span></p><p>I personally think that it is interesting that this method is working at all but would advise everyone to be very cautious about it.</p><p>source: keznews.com</p><p><strong>Update:</strong></p><p>Adrian corrected my assumption that the bruteforce attack would hammer Microsoft servers to check the keys. This is apparently not the case. Keys are generated on the local pc and the user has to try the activation with the key manually. This is the only time the Microsoft server is contacted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/02/got-no-vista-key-bruteforce-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
