<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; uefi</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/uefi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Windows 8, Boot Security And Third Party Operating Systems</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/09/23/windows-8-boot-security-and-third-party-operating-systems/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/09/23/windows-8-boot-security-and-third-party-operating-systems/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:34:29 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bios]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[secure boot]]></category> <category><![CDATA[uefi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows 8]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=50748</guid> <description><![CDATA[Things got heated up quite a bit in the past two days as Microsoft started to reveal information about boot security in Windows 8. The main concern raised by Matthew Garrett and others was that secure boot could prevent the installation and use of third party operating systems like Linux on an OEM system running [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things got heated up quite a bit in the past two days as Microsoft started to <a
href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/20/reengineering-the-windows-boot-experience.aspx">reveal</a> information about boot security in Windows 8. The main concern raised by <a
href="http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/5552.html">Matthew Garrett</a> and others was that secure boot could prevent the installation and use of third party operating systems like Linux on an OEM system running Windows 8.</p><p><em>Please note that this is only a issue for UEFI systems, if you plan to upgrade an existing system with BIOS you won&#8217;t be affected by it.</em></p><blockquote><p>The UEFI secure boot protocol is the foundation of an architecturally neutral approach to platform and firmware security. Based on the Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) process to validate firmware images before they are allowed to execute, secure boot helps reduce the risk of boot loader attacks. Microsoft relies on this protocol in Windows 8 to improve platform security for our customers.</p></blockquote><p>Microsoft today responded to those claims in another article <a
href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/22/protecting-the-pre-os-environment-with-uefi.aspx">on the</a> Building Windows 8 blog. OEM systems shipping with Windows 8 will have secure boot enabled by default to only load verified operating system loaders during boot time. This prevents malware from switching the boot loader, but also other operating systems that are not signed from being loaded.</p><p>While Secure Boot is enabled by default, it is up to the OEM to add controls to UEFI to allow the user to disable the feature. The Samsung tablet that Microsoft gave away on the BUILD conference for instance came with an option to disable Secure Boot on the device.</p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/secure-boot.jpg" alt="secure boot" title="secure boot" width="480" height="329" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-50749" /></p><p>Microsoft employee Tony Mangefeste notes that &#8220;OEMs are free to choose how to enable this support&#8221;, which means that OEM could make the decision to not implement the override in the UEFI configuration. This would then mean that customers would not be able to boot third party operating systems from the OEM machine.</p><p>The only option that consumers have at this point is to find out about this in advance before making a purchase. I for one would never buy a system that prevents me from loading a third party OS.</p><p>Your options to install Windows 8 are:</p><ul><li>Install Windows 8 on a PC with BIOS.</li><li>Build your own new PC, or have it build for you.</li><li>Verify that the OEM PC with Windows 8 is offering an option to disable Secure Boot before purchasing it.</li><li>Hope that someone will come up with a hacked firmware to disable Secure Boot</li></ul><p>What&#8217;s your take on Secure Boot? I personally think that it improves security, and do not think that it is an issue as long as all OEMs add the means to disable the feature. Let me know in the comments.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/09/23/windows-8-boot-security-and-third-party-operating-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Windows 8 Fast Startup, Faster Boot Times</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/09/09/windows-8-fast-startup-faster-boot-times/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/09/09/windows-8-fast-startup-faster-boot-times/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:09:21 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fast startup]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hybrid book]]></category> <category><![CDATA[uefi]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows 8]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=50255</guid> <description><![CDATA[I like the idea of booting a computer in a very short time, even though I do not think that it will make such a big impact on desktop PCs. I boot my desktop PC once in the morning, and shut it down in the night. During boot I go make coffee and something to [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of booting a computer in a very short time, even though I do not think that it will make such a big impact on desktop PCs. I boot my desktop PC once in the morning, and shut it down in the night. During boot I go make coffee and something to eat, and when I come back everything is fully loaded and ready for use.</p><p>For mobile devices like laptops though, and situations where the computer is shut down and restarted again multiple times throughout the day, the new Windows 8 Hybrid Boot technology could have a huge impact.</p><p>Microsoft is very thorough when it comes to improving the operating system. The company always starts with data of the current use. When it comes to Windows 7, Microsoft noticed that 45% of laptop users and 57% of desktop users where shutting down (and possibly restarting) the operating system. The reason for shutting down the PC, instead of putting it in sleep or hibernation, has several reasons. A core reason is that some users want their PCs completely off, while others want to preserve as much batter or energy as they can.</p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/8585.Windows-7-Laptop-Power-Transitions_63AF5D64-600x326.jpg" alt="windows 7 laptop power transitions" title="windows 7 laptop power transitions" width="600" height="326" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-50256" /></p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/4774.Windows-7-Desktop-Power-Transitions_3555D7B7-600x326.jpg" alt="windows 7 desktop power transitions" title="windows 7 desktop power transitions" width="600" height="326" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-50257" /></p><p>The core difference between the boot process in Windows 7 and <a
href="http://www.windows8news.com">Windows 8</a> is this. Microsoft uses hibernation to save the kernel session. Think of it as partial hibernation. The core gain is a speed increase of 30% to 70% on all systems, as &#8220;reading the hiberfile in and reinitializing drivers is much faster&#8221;. But that&#8217;s not the only reason why it is faster. Microsoft has added multi-phase resume capabilities to the operating system which uses all cpu cores in multi-core systems in parallel to split the work load.</p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/windows-8-fast-startup.png" alt="windows 8 fast startup" title="windows 8 fast startup" width="560" height="164" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-50259" /></p><p>Here is a video demonstrating the fast startup feature of the Windows 8 operating system.</p><p><iframe
width="560" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/g9LrsZNCG1s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p>Microsoft notes that the demonstration above used a laptop with an UEFI BIOS. This speeds up the POST significantly.</p><blockquote><p>One thing you’ll notice in the video was how fast the POST handoff to Windows occurred. Systems that are built using Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) are more likely to achieve very fast pre-boot times when compared to those with traditional BIOS. This isn’t because UEFI is inherently faster, but because UEFI writers starting from scratch are more able to optimize their implementation rather than building upon a BIOS implementation that may be many years old. The good news is that most system and motherboard manufacturers have begun to implement UEFI, so these kinds of fast startup times will be more prevalent for new systems.</p></blockquote><p>Systems with traditional platter based hard drives and the faster solid state drives will benefit from the faster startup mode. Additional information about fast boot times in Windows 8 are available <a
href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/09/08/delivering-fast-boot-times-in-windows-8.aspx">at th</a>e Building Windows 8 blog.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/09/09/windows-8-fast-startup-faster-boot-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>13</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Goodbye BIOS Here Comes UEFI</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/06/goodbye-bios-here-comes-uefi/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/06/goodbye-bios-here-comes-uefi/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:06:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[amd]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bios]]></category> <category><![CDATA[intel]]></category> <category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[uefi]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/06/goodbye-bios-here-comes-uefi/</guid> <description><![CDATA[UEFI which is an acronym for Unified Extensible Firmware Interface which will eventually replace the 20+ year old Bios. The new standard is backed by everyone so to speak including Intel, AMD, Microsoft, IBM, American Megatrends, Phoenix Technologies and Apple.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UEFI which is an acronym for Unified Extensible Firmware Interface which will eventually replace the 20+ year old Bios. The new standard is backed by everyone so to speak including Intel, AMD, Microsoft, IBM, American Megatrends, Phoenix Technologies and Apple.</p><p>Support will be added to Windows Vista with Service Pack 1 and is already available for Microsoft Windows Server 2008 and first motherboards supporting UEFI are already available on the market (MSI P35 Neo3). One of the main differences between BIOS and UEFI is the way applications are coded. Assembler was used if functions or applications had to be coded for the BIOS while a higher level language code will be used to program the UEFI.</p><p>The memory footprint is about 10 times smaller as well. The main benefits for customers are a better presentation and (probably) motherboards that are more stable. When will the transition be complete ? Insiders suggest that it might take between two or three years.</p><p><span
id="more-3129"></span><br
/><blockquote>The UEFI specification defines a new model for the interface between personal-computer operating systems and platform firmware. The interface consists of data tables that contain platform-related information, plus boot and runtime service calls that are available to the operating system and its loader. Together, these provide a standard environment for booting an operating system and running pre-boot applications.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/06/goodbye-bios-here-comes-uefi/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
