<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; tpm</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/tpm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Are Biometrics the most Important Portable Feature?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/23/are-biometrics-the-most-important-portable-feature/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/23/are-biometrics-the-most-important-portable-feature/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:10:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Mike Halsey MVP</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[biometric]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bitlocker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fingerprint]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tpm]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=51782</guid> <description><![CDATA[As we carry more devices around with us, smartphones, tablets, netbooks, ultraportables, than ever before and now I&#8217;m wrondering if biometrics are fast becoming the must-have addition for mobile computing in the 21st century.  I have a variety of mobile devices myself and have tested a great many more in the last year.  Of these, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we carry more devices around with us, smartphones, tablets, netbooks, ultraportables, than ever before and now I&#8217;m wrondering if biometrics are fast becoming <em>the</em> must-have addition for mobile computing in the 21st century.  I have a variety of mobile devices myself and have tested a great many more in the last year.  Of these, only two have included what I would call <strong>proper</strong> biometrics, in that they have had a TPM (Trusted Platform Module) chip on the motherbard.  These being my own laptop, I was never going to get a laptop without one, and a Samsung Series 9 Ultraportable laptop that I was sent recently for a Microsoft event.</p><p>Of the rest, I&#8217;m currently testing an Acer laptop that has a fingerprint scanner but no TPM chip, and a friend has recently bought a low-cost Lenovo laptop that includes the same and has the same ommission.  Neither of my tablets have any kind of TPM and neither does my smartphone or any other smartphone or tablet that I&#8217;ve tested.</p><p><img
class="alignleft size-full wp-image-51783" src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/240016_f520.jpg" alt="" width="218" height="147" />A TPM chip is one that stores encryption keys that allow you to securely encrypt the contents of the full hard disk or SSD in the machine.  The TPM chip works in conjunction with operating system solutions, most well known being Bitlocker in Windows Vista and Windows 7, to unlock those drives on a passcode, use of a physical hardware key, contactless smartcard or automatically on log-in.  They can prevent that data from ever beaing read if the operating system is reinstalled or if the hard disk is physically removed, as the encryption key is tied to the TPM chip, which is physically undetachable from its host motherboard.</p><p>On my own laptop I use Bitlocker to encrypt all my files and data and, while it&#8217;s far from perfact still, it gives me the peace of mind I need that coupled with a very strong 10+ digit Windows password, nobody but me can ever gain access to my files.</p><p>The downside of facilities such as  Bitlocker is they&#8217;re only currently supported in the Enterprise and Ultimate editions of Windows, a problem I sincerely hope Microsoft will rectify with Windows 8, as I&#8217;ve only once been sent a laptop with Windows 7 Ultimate on it, and that was the afore-mentioned Acer that didn&#8217;t have a TPM chip anyway.</p><p>Of the laptops that include fingerprint readers, I can assure you these things are pretty useless and people soon stop using them.  Also what&#8217;s the point of just having secure access to Windows when it&#8217;s still simple to pop the hard disk out and plug it into another machine.</p><p>The situation with tablets is different, most of the time anyway, with bespoke flash storage modules that can&#8217;t be plugged into another computer and where the password can only be bypassed by flashing the machine.  With Windows 8 tablets coming next year this advantage may quickly disappear though in favour of more traditional mini-SSDs with larger capacities on board.</p><p>My argument is that, certainly on laptops, ultraportables and netbooks, but also and perhaps to a slightly lesser extent, tablets, smartphones and even desktops, TPM chips should now be everywhere and encryption should be simple and intuitive if not completely automatic and seamless (as it is on some new high-end hard disks).  The amount of data we all have and carry around with us now is incredibly valuable, not just to us but also to others.  With the prices of TPM chips at an all-time low, I really can&#8217;t see why we&#8217;re not seeing ubiquity here in the way they are implemented.</p><p>The software solutions will also need to drastically improve to make them much easier to understand and use.  We can&#8217;t still be in a position a year from now though where TPM chips are still only found on high-end business laptops costing more than $1,000.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/23/are-biometrics-the-most-important-portable-feature/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>8</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Enable Bitlocker On Unsupported Hardware</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/22/enable-bitlocker-on-unsupported-hardware/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/22/enable-bitlocker-on-unsupported-hardware/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:19:38 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bitlocker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[enable bitlocker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gpedit.msc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tpm]]></category> <category><![CDATA[trusted platform module]]></category> <category><![CDATA[vista bitlocker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows 7 bitlocker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vista enterprise]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows vista ultimate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows-vista]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/22/enable-bitlocker-on-unsupported-hardware/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Bitlocker is an additional software component that gets distributed with Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate and Enterprise only. It can be used to encrypt full partitions on computer systems but can only be run on supported hardware. Bitlocker by default does require a Trusted Platform Module chip (TPM Chip) that is located on the computer&#8217;s motherboard. [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bitlocker is an additional software component that gets distributed with Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate and Enterprise only. It can be used to encrypt full partitions on computer systems but can only be run on supported hardware. Bitlocker by default does require a Trusted Platform Module chip (TPM Chip) that is located on the computer&#8217;s motherboard. This chip contains a cryptographic key that Bitlocker uses in the encryption process.</p><p>There is however a way to enable Bitlocker encryption even if the computer does not have a TPM chip. The following method will enable Bitlocker and should work in the upcoming Microsoft operating system <a
href="http://www.windows7news.com/">Windows 7</a> as well.</p><ul><li>Run [<strong>gpedit.msc</strong>] by either clicking on the Windows Vista Start Menu button or by using the shortcut [<strong>Windows R</strong>]. This will open the Group Policy Editor.</li><li>Locate the following menu: <strong>Computer Configuration\Administrative Templates\Windows Components\BitLocker Drive Encryption</strong></li><li>Enable the Advanced Startup Options by double-clicking on Control Panel Setup to display the advanced options.</li><li>Click on Enabled and check the Allow Bitlocker Without A Compatible TPM Checkbox.</li></ul><p><span
id="more-11389"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/bitlocker.png" alt="bitlocker" title="bitlocker" width="414" height="459" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11388" /></p><p>A click on OK will enable Bitlocker on computer systems without Trusted Platform Module chips. It is from then on possible to save the Bitlocker encryption key on an external storage device like an USB stick or Flash memory card. This key is essential for accessing the encrypted partitions. There is no way of accessing the encrypted partition or hard drive if the storage device gets damaged or lost.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/22/enable-bitlocker-on-unsupported-hardware/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
