<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; techmeme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/techmeme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Credible Reporting eh?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/21/credible-reporting-eh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/21/credible-reporting-eh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newscred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumbleupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techmeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/21/credible-reporting-eh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Digg (on occasion), StumbleUpon and sometimes Google News. The New York Times and Techmeme satisfy the rest of my needs.
I didn’t really think I could be interested in yet another crowd-powered news aggregating website… Mixx, Reddit, Regator, Social Median,&#160; Soshable, Propeller, Sphinn even… whether they’re the next Digg I have no idea… but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Digg (on occasion), StumbleUpon and sometimes Google News. The New York Times and Techmeme satisfy the rest of my needs.</p>
<p>I didn’t really think I could be interested in yet another crowd-powered news aggregating website… <a href="http://mixx.com">Mixx</a>, <a href="http://reddit.com">Reddit</a>, <a href="http://www.regator.com/">Regator</a>, <a href="http://www.socialmedian.com/">Social Median</a>,&#160; <a href="http://soshable.com/">Soshable</a>, Propeller, <a href="http://sphinn.com/">Sphinn</a> even… whether they’re the next <a href="http://digg.com">Digg</a> I have no idea… but it sure isn’t worth the time signing up in my opinion.</p>
<p>I was very interested in the announcement yesterday however, that a new service called ‘NewsCred’ was launching with the aim of gathering and aggregating articles based on their credibility over blind crowd popularity.</p>
<p>It’s a fantastic objective, one which anyone who has used Digg over the last few years would probably <strong>love </strong>to see… it’s all too common where completely bogus stories are Dugg right to the front page (and sometimes consequently removed by the &quot;invisible hand’ of non-existent editors&#8217;).</p>
<p> <span id="more-6326"></span>
<p>Crowd’s usually vote based on personal preference and opinion as well… a story about Microsoft may be brilliant, well-researched and accurate… but is buried by Apple fans purely because they dislike Microsoft.</p>
<p>W ether or not NewsCred can get around that will be interesting to see, although it isn’t the first to attempt this strategy; <a href="http://www.newstrust.net/">NewsTrust</a> has been around for a few years (although I had never heard of it before) and has had slow but steady growth.</p>
<p>The most useful and interesting thing about NewsCred is the analytics option… you can examine the credibility of a publication based on how it fared on NewsCred. Just one indicator sure… but with time it should really be a good measure of the reporting quality of various news sources.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/image9.png"><img style="0px" height="319" alt="image" src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/image-thumb4.png" width="584" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>You can also customise the NewsCred front page based on your interests and the publications you prefer. In many ways, even if the credibility factor doesn’t worry you, it’s still a good source of daily news much like Google News.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/credibility/" title="credibility" rel="tag">credibility</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/digg/" title="digg" rel="tag">digg</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/google-news/" title="google news" rel="tag">google news</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/news/" title="news" rel="tag">news</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/newscred/" title="newscred" rel="tag">newscred</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/stumbleupon/" title="stumbleupon" rel="tag">stumbleupon</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/techmeme/" title="techmeme" rel="tag">techmeme</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/11/why-stumbleupon-is-better-than-digg-for-webmasters/" title="Why Stumbleupon is better than Digg for Webmasters (May 11, 2007)">Why Stumbleupon is better than Digg for Webmasters</a> (11)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/15/google-fast-flip/" title="Google Fast Flip (September 15, 2009)">Google Fast Flip</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/07/27/fichey-digital-microfiche/" title="Fichey Digital Microfiche (July 27, 2007)">Fichey Digital Microfiche</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/11/when-on-digg-be-careful/" title="When on Digg be careful (January 11, 2008)">When on Digg be careful</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/02/12/use-stumbleupon-without-the-toolbar/" title="Use Stumbleupon without the toolbar (February 12, 2008)">Use Stumbleupon without the toolbar</a> (3)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/21/credible-reporting-eh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
