<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; sunspider test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/sunspider-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Test Your Browser&#8217;s JavaScript Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunspider test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cnet ran some tests on the JavaScript performance of selected browsers like the latest Firefox version, Firefox beta and Google Chrome builds. JavaScript performance was in the news since Google and the Mozilla Firefox development team announced improvements in JavaScript performance. 
Cnet used the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark to test browser performance of the browsers. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cnet ran some tests on the JavaScript performance of selected browsers like the latest <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Firefox</a> version, Firefox beta and Google Chrome builds. JavaScript performance was in the news since Google and the <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Mozilla Firefox</a> development team announced improvements in JavaScript performance. </p>
<p><a href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-driver.html">Cnet</a> used the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark to test browser performance of the browsers. There are other factors that have an impact on JavaScript performance like the processing power of the computer system.</p>
<p>The results were that the latest Firefox 3.1 beta with the new JavaScript engine TraceMonkey was the fastest with a score of 2,257, followed by Chrome with 2,904, Firefox 3 beta 1 without TraceMonkey with 4,233, Safari 3.1.2 with 6,351 and <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/internet-explorer/">Internet Explorer</a> 8 Beta 2 at the end with a score of 9,025.</p>
<p><span id="more-7701"></span>Cnet failed  to test any version of <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/category/browsing/opera/">Opera</a> and should probably have tested the latest nightly test of Safari instead. Here are the results that a Windows XP service pack 3 with a Intel 8400 Wolfdale processor and 4 Gigabytes of computer memory. </p>
<ul>
<li>Firefox 3.1 Beta 1 without TraceMonkey- 1800</li>
<li>Firefox 3.1 Beta 1 with Tracemonkey 1817</li>
<li>Firefox 3.03 &#8211; 2139 </li>
<li>Opera 9.6 &#8211; 2736</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit surprising that Firefox without TraceMonkey was faster than Firefox with it enabled. It could be due to the fact that the portable version of Firefox has been used to run the tests. But the interesting question is, how does your browser compare? You need to run at least two browsers to be able to tell how it compares to the other browser.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that JavaScript performance is not everything and that page loading time is dependent on additional factors.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/" title="firefox" rel="tag">firefox</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/google-chrome/" title="google chrome" rel="tag">google chrome</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/internet-explorer/" title="internet-explorer" rel="tag">internet-explorer</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/javascript/" title="javascript" rel="tag">javascript</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/javascript-performance/" title="JavaScript performance" rel="tag">JavaScript performance</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/performance/" title="performance" rel="tag">performance</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/safari/" title="safari" rel="tag">safari</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/sunspider-test/" title="sunspider test" rel="tag">sunspider test</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/04/xenocode-web-browser-sandbox/" title="Xenocode Web Browser Sandbox (April 4, 2009)">Xenocode Web Browser Sandbox</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/21/web-browser-popularity/" title="Web Browser Popularity (March 21, 2009)">Web Browser Popularity</a> (51)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/21/web-browser-memory-usage-benchmark-gets-it-all-wrong/" title="Web Browser Memory Usage Benchmark Gets It All Wrong (June 21, 2009)">Web Browser Memory Usage Benchmark Gets It All Wrong</a> (15)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/15/web-browser-have-impact-on-battery-life/" title="Web Browser Have Impact On Battery Life (September 15, 2009)">Web Browser Have Impact On Battery Life</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/14/web-browser-benchmark-comparison/" title="Web Browser Benchmark Comparison (December 14, 2008)">Web Browser Benchmark Comparison</a> (19)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
