<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; overclocking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/overclocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OverClock Checking Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/15/overclock-checking-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/15/overclock-checking-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/15/overclock-checking-tool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had my first overclocking experience with my brand new Pentium 75 back then in the days when this was considered a fast cpu. A friend of mine actually introduced me to it to and we managed to make the computer a little bit faster that way. After that I never looked back and never [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had my first overclocking experience with my brand new Pentium 75 back then in the days when this was considered a fast cpu. A friend of mine actually introduced me to it to and we managed to make the computer a little bit faster that way. After that I never looked back and never tried to overclock again, rumors of reduced component life time and instablity kept me away. I also had no need to overclock the PC just to get a few percent in speed, figured it was not worth it.</p>
<p>Overclocking has changed over time though and it seems that the change is drastic when you look at video cards for instance. You can buy overclocked video cards right from the manufacturer and even the standard tools from Nvidia and Ati make it possible to overclock the GPU.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only natural that the overclocking scene created tools to check if the changes were causing any instabilities on their system and that&#8217;s where OverClock Checking Tool [<a href="http://www.ocbase.com/perestroika_en/index.php">OCCT</a>, via <a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/software/08/03/14/overclock-checking-toolocct-200">Neowin</a>] comes into play. The startup window is displaying all kinds of information about your computer that are relevant to overclockers, e.g. voltages or cpu and bus clock settings.</p>
<p><span id="more-3520"></span><img src='http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/overclock_checking_tool.jpg' alt='overclock checking tool' /></p>
<p>The main purpose of OCCT is to check the two core components CPU and RAM with the option to check one or both of the components. The default test lasts for an hour but there is the possibility to raise that to two hours or let it run until you hit the OFF button.</p>
<p><img src='http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/overclocking_test.jpg' alt='overclocking test' /></p>
<p>Results are saved as graphs in graphics which is great because you will have access to them even if you close the tool.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/overclocking/" title="overclocking" rel="tag">overclocking</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/software/" title="software" rel="tag">software</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows/" title="Windows" rel="tag">Windows</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/08/zip-repair/" title="Zip Repair (June 8, 2008)">Zip Repair</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/15/zen-key-an-all-purpose-application-manager/" title="Zen Key An All Purpose Application Manager (July 15, 2008)">Zen Key An All Purpose Application Manager</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/13/youtube-batch-downloader/" title="Youtube Batch Downloader (May 13, 2008)">Youtube Batch Downloader</a> (13)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/10/yahoo-widget-position-restorer/" title="Yahoo Widget Position Restorer (July 10, 2008)">Yahoo Widget Position Restorer</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2006/02/23/workrave/" title="Workrave (February 23, 2006)">Workrave</a> (6)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/15/overclock-checking-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DIY: Easy CPU probe</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/25/diy-easy-cpu-probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/25/diy-easy-cpu-probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tobey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[do-it-yourself]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/25/diy-easy-cpu-probe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We always try to lower our CPU usage as much as possible for a normal use. Still, there are situations like testing purposes when we may want our CPU to be 100% busy to test its behavior. This is usually tightly related to overclocking and probing the CPU cooling system capability along with it. Of course you can always use benchmarking applications to give your system some harsh time but it's not necessary when you know how to increase CPU load all the way up to 100% easily in a few seconds. Note that this has only been tested on single-core computers, it prolly won't work with multi-core CPUs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We always try to lower our CPU usage as much as possible for a normal use. Still, there are situations like testing purposes when we may want our CPU to be 100% busy to test its behavior. This is usually tightly related to overclocking and probing the CPU cooling system capability along with it. Of course you can always use benchmarking applications to give your system some harsh time but it&#8217;s not necessary when you know how to increase CPU load all the way up to 100% easily in a few seconds. Note that this has only been tested on single-core computers, it prolly won&#8217;t work with multi-core CPUs.</p>
<p>Once when messing with command-line features a bit, I found out that a simple 1-line code can bring my CPU to 100% load in a second for as long as I want. If I really wanted to test the reliability of my CPU fan or water cooling system, I would run this tiny code for pretty long time like a few hours to make my CPU sweat a bit. Now to that simple code &#8211; bring up the Run window by pressing Win+R and start command line by putting cmd in it. Here comes that simple loop:</p>
<p><span id="more-2647"></span><i>for /L %i in (1,1,#) do help</i><br />
(replace the # with a number determining how many loops will be executed and also how much time it&#8217;ll take to finish the task, depending on your CPU&#8217;s performance)</p>
<p>Pretty simple, huh? It does nothing else than to repeat displaying command-line&#8217;s built-in help which should raise (according to my multiple tests) every single-core CPU load to 100% and maintain it at that level for the time the script is executed. That&#8217;s all folks !</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/cooling/" title="cooling" rel="tag">cooling</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/cpu/" title="cpu" rel="tag">cpu</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/cpu-probe/" title="cpu probe" rel="tag">cpu probe</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/diy/" title="diy" rel="tag">diy</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/do-it-yourself/" title="do-it-yourself" rel="tag">do-it-yourself</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/fan/" title="fan" rel="tag">fan</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/overclocking/" title="overclocking" rel="tag">overclocking</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-tips/" title="windows tips" rel="tag">windows tips</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/02/12/the-most-annoying-pc-noise-makers/" title="The most annoying pc noise makers (February 12, 2007)">The most annoying pc noise makers</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/04/25/monitor-cpu-core-temperatures/" title="Monitor CPU Core Temperatures (April 25, 2008)">Monitor CPU Core Temperatures</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/08/19/xdn-tweaker-for-windows/" title="XdN Tweaker for Windows (August 19, 2007)">XdN Tweaker for Windows</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/02/windows-xp-run-count-list-and-editor/" title="Windows XP Run Count List and Editor (March 2, 2008)">Windows XP Run Count List and Editor</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/15/windows-xp-prompts-to-activate-every-time/" title="Windows XP prompts to activate every time (December 15, 2007)">Windows XP prompts to activate every time</a> (6)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/12/25/diy-easy-cpu-probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
