<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Windows 7 any different?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/12/is-windows-7-any-different/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/12/is-windows-7-any-different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Pataki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realize that I may not know enough, but does Windows 7 offer any radically different stuff? I mean I am one of the few people who likes Vista, but how exactly is Windows 7 more than a sort of addon? I always feel that instead of a new OS, Windows 7 is what Vista [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that I may not know enough, but does <a href="http://windows7news.com/">Windows 7</a> offer any radically different stuff? I mean I am one of the few people who likes Vista, but how exactly is Windows 7 more than a sort of addon? I always feel that instead of a new OS, Windows 7 is what Vista wanted to be. We were promised a completely redesigned and different OS by Microsoft a while ago and I don&#8217;t really thing they&#8217;re delivering again.</p>
<p>Sure, it looks better, it&#8217;s possibly faster, it might even have some cool new tech under the hood, but in the end I don&#8217;t really care, and I doubt 98% of the end users care. Aeroshake is a nice innovation and the other special actions, taskbar stuff, it shows the company is thinking about users finally, but is it doing enough? I can&#8217;t really see the awesome breakthroughs, the innovations, radical new ways of OS design. I&#8217;m starting to think Microsoft would rather stay with the old and at least keep most of their market, then go for something new and risk it.</p>
<p>With even free OS-s like Ubuntu starting not only to catch up, but surpass Microsoft Windows in many ways, perhaps it&#8217;s time to start thinking differently, since in the long run Windows won&#8217;t stand a chance. 3 years ago I couldn&#8217;t get my internet connection to work with Ubuntu, I couldn&#8217;t read Windows partitions, the software available was limited or for tech savvy people. Now ubuntu is more plug and play than Windows! Microsoft better starp on a pair or they will be in real trouble.That being said I like Windows 7, but I don&#8217;t see the radicaly changes I thought would come.</p>
<p><span id="more-8224"></span></p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/microsoft/" title="microsoft" rel="tag">microsoft</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/opinion/" title="opinion" rel="tag">opinion</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/windows-7/" title="windows 7" rel="tag">windows 7</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/23/windows-media-player-light/" title="Windows Media Player Light (September 23, 2008)">Windows Media Player Light</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/17/windows-7-to-ship-in-2009/" title="Windows 7 to ship in 2009 ? (January 17, 2008)">Windows 7 to ship in 2009 ?</a> (17)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/03/windows-7-to-launch-october-22/" title="Windows 7 To Launch October 22 (June 3, 2009)">Windows 7 To Launch October 22</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/27/windows-7-to-be-released-in-2010/" title="Windows 7 to be released in 2010 (May 27, 2008)">Windows 7 to be released in 2010</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/22/windows-7-released/" title="Windows 7 Released (October 22, 2009)">Windows 7 Released</a> (5)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/12/is-windows-7-any-different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m not switching to Firefox 3 just yet</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/why-im-not-switching-to-firefox-3-just-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/why-im-not-switching-to-firefox-3-just-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Pataki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=5079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t usually write opinion posts so much here on gHacks, but I thought I&#8217;d share my views with you about all major Firefox releases (and all open source major releases in general). Since Firefox, Wordpress and other big-big community oriented projects rely so much on the community force behind them, when a new release [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t usually write opinion posts so much here on gHacks, but I thought I&#8217;d share my views with you about all major <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Firefox</a> releases (and all open source major releases in general). Since Firefox, Wordpress and other big-big community oriented projects rely so much on the community force behind them, when a new release comes, initially everyone is a bit lost. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve installed Firefox 3, chances are that half your addons didn&#8217;t work, after some tweaking and tuning you got some to work, but for many you will still need to wait until the author has time to update. Especially since much of the data is now stored in database format instead of simple text files, many of the extensions can&#8217;t work. Also, for me even with the very last release candidate Firefox shut down from time to time for no apparent reason, although I haven&#8217;t tried, only downloaded the final release. </p>
<p>These are the reasons I&#8217;m not upgrading, I&#8217;ll wait a month and then make the jump when all the extensions I can&#8217;t live without are upgraded. This hassle of upgrading is a problem with all open source stuff, however I think this can hardly be handled as &#8220;difference between commercial and open source&#8221; type problem. </p>
<p><span id="more-5079"></span></p>
<p>If a commercial app gets an overhaul, no matter how great, you get maybe 20-30 new features, but even that&#8217;s pushing it. With Firefox that many features are added daily with extensions, themes and so on, so in essence when you have some problems upgrading, this isn&#8217;t a problem, but a sort of necessary evil. You can hardly expect all authors to jump every time there&#8217;s a new release, and anyway, many of them have developed their extensions prior to the final release, so you still have a lot to work with.</p>
<p>As an end note I want to say that despite the fact that this upgrading can be a hassle sometimes I have great respect for everyone involved with open source development and want to thank them for all the great extensions they&#8217;ve given us. If you can&#8217;t upgrade an extension, be sure to monitor the progress, even if you find a suitable alternative you can download the original when it gets its upgrade as a means of thanks to the author.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox-3/" title="firefox 3" rel="tag">firefox 3</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/open-source/" title="Open Source" rel="tag">Open Source</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/opinion/" title="opinion" rel="tag">opinion</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/upgrading/" title="upgrading" rel="tag">upgrading</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/14/firefox-3-history-recovery/" title="Firefox 3 History Recovery (September 14, 2009)">Firefox 3 History Recovery</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/21/xkcd-comic-wallpaper-changer/" title="Xkcd Comic Wallpaper Changer (October 21, 2009)">Xkcd Comic Wallpaper Changer</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/03/wireless-network-scanner-inssider/" title="Wireless Network Scanner inSSIDer (July 3, 2009)">Wireless Network Scanner inSSIDer</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/10/winlibre-your-open-source-software-library/" title="WinLibre, your open source software library (January 10, 2008)">WinLibre, your open source software library</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/17/winlame-2009-released/" title="WinLAME 2009 Beta Released (April 17, 2009)">WinLAME 2009 Beta Released</a> (5)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/22/why-im-not-switching-to-firefox-3-just-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
