<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; operator</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/operator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Google Replaces + Search Operator</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/25/google-replaces-search-operator/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/25/google-replaces-search-operator/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:09:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google news]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google search]]></category> <category><![CDATA[operator]]></category> <category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=51904</guid> <description><![CDATA[Advanced search operators like the + or &#8211; symbols can be used to optimize a search. The &#8211; operator for instance makes sure that the term following is not included on pages in the search results. An example for this is the query technology -blog which would only display results that would match the technology [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advanced search operators like the + or &#8211; symbols can be used to optimize a search. The &#8211; operator for instance makes sure that the term following is not included on pages in the search results. An example for this is the query technology -blog which would only display results that would match the technology term <strong>and not</strong> the blog term. The + operator on the other hand made sure that the term following would also be included on each of the result pages.</p><p>Google users who use the + operator nowadays for their searches will see a notification at the top notifying them that the &#8220;+ operator has been replaced&#8221; and that they now have to use double quotation marks to search for an exact word or phrase in the search engine.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/google+operator.jpg"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/google+operator.jpg" alt="google + operator" title="google + operator" width="571" height="215" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-51905" /></a></p><p>Instead of searching for <strong>technology +news</strong> in Google, users now have to use the search phrase <strong>technology &#8220;news&#8221;</strong> instead for the desired result.</p><p>What if you want multiple exact words or phrases included in your search phrase? Then you need to use double quotation marks for all the terms. Say you want to search for technology and both news and blog included on each of the resulting pages. You would then search Google for <strong>technology &#8220;news&#8221; &#8220;blog&#8221;</strong>.</p><p>A Google Rep <a
href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Web%20Search/thread?tid=151ef6cf0a761b74&#038;hl=en">on the</a> official Google Search support forum confirmed the change.</p><blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve made the ways you can tell Google exactly what you want more consistent by expanding the functionality of the quotation marks operator. In addition to using this operator to search for an exact phrase, you can now add quotation marks around a single word to tell Google to match that word precisely. So, if in the past you would have searched for [magazine +latina], you should now search for [magazine "latina"].</p><p>We&#8217;re constantly making changes to Google Search &#8211; adding new features, tweaking the look and feel, running experiments, &#8211; all to get you the information you need as quickly and as easily as possible. This recent change is another step toward simplifying the search experience to get you to the info you want.</p></blockquote><p>The question here is if the new method simplifies search. Users now have to use two symbols instead of one to include exact single word searches. It simplifies search if an exact search phrase needs to be included on the websites in the results, as users would have used double quotation marks in this case anyway for the desired result.</p><p>Some users on Webmaster World <a
href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4378735.htm">have</a> criticized Google for that move as it can now happen that pages appear in the search results that do not include the exact phrase. While the pages are mostly relevant to the search query itself, it can happen that the exact term does not appear on said pages (e.g. some results for the query &#8220;new york train timetable&#8221; do not contain that exact phrase.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/25/google-replaces-search-operator/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>13</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Opera, Tor and Privoxy combined</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/07/opera-tor-and-privoxy-combined/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/07/opera-tor-and-privoxy-combined/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 12:36:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[anonymizer]]></category> <category><![CDATA[operator]]></category> <category><![CDATA[privoxy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tor]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/07/opera-tor-and-privoxy-combined/</guid> <description><![CDATA[OperaTor is a combination of Opera, the anonymization service Tor and Privoxy similar to Foxtor which offers the same functionality for Firefox. I don't want to bore you with a lengthy technical description of how Tor is providing anonymity, just that much: Tor uses a layered approach sending your request through a series of servers that only know the server before and after them. This means that the destination server does not know that you requested the package, it only knows the IP of the server before that made the request.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OperaTor is a combination of Opera, the anonymization network Tor and Privoxy similar to Foxtor which offers the same functionality for Firefox. I don&#8217;t want to bore you with a lengthy technical description of how Tor is providing anonymity, just that much: Tor uses a layered approach sending your request through a series of servers that only know the server before and after them. This means that the destination server does not know that you requested the package, it only knows the IP of the server before that made the request.</p><p>OperaTor is not complicated to setup and use. You only need to download the binary executable for Microsoft Windows and unpack it on your system. No installation is required which is great for mobile use. You could for instance copy Operator to your USB stick and run it from any computer that has Internet access. Great for internet cafes and other public computers. Just start the OperaTor.exe and all three required applications will be started automatically. Just use Opera as usual from this point on and rest assured that no data will be saved on the local computer.</p><p><span
id="more-1516"></span>It is a good idea to test the connection and make sure that you are really surfing anonymous. The easiest way would be to check that with a script that displays your IP. I have written a basic script that <a
href="http://www.ghacks.net/ip/">displays your IP</a>. Compare that IP to the one when you are not using OperaTor to know that the service is working.</p><p>The developers are updating OperaTor whenever a new version of Tor, Privoxy or Opera come out. Make sure you check the site frequently to always use the latest version of OperaTor.</p><p>Update: Operator has been discontinued. The developer has created a new program, called <a
href="http://archetwist.com/en/opera/operator">Operator YAPO</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/07/opera-tor-and-privoxy-combined/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
