<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; lifehacker</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/lifehacker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Quo Vadis Lifehacker?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/05/03/quo-vadis-lifehacker/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/05/03/quo-vadis-lifehacker/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 09:48:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[ask the readers]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[rss feed]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tech news]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=44644</guid> <description><![CDATA[When I started blogging in 2005 Lifehacker was one of the two blogs that I read regularly (the other was Download Squad). Back then, it offered a mix of tech and non-tech articles and guides that made it one of my favorite sources for information. It was one of the first blogs that I added [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started blogging in 2005 Lifehacker was one of the two blogs that I read regularly (the other was Download Squad). Back then, it offered a mix of tech and non-tech articles and guides that made it one of my favorite sources for information.</p><p>It was one of the first blogs that I added to Netvibes, my first RSS reading and management service, and was carried over to Google Reader, the Firefox extension Brief and my current RSS reader RSSOwl.</p><p>For the past year or so I have read less and less posts on Lifehacker. I usually only look at the headlines and mark the articles as read. It is not because the authors at Lifehacker produce less content, quite the contrary.</p><p>The core reason is my impression that Lifehacker has reduced the tech article output. Now, this may be my impression and I have no idea if this is true or not. What I do see is an increase in mobile and cell phone related contents which seem to have replaced much of the old tech related articles on Lifehacker.</p><p>Even worse in my opinion; The tech articles that get posted are often old news, at least for me and users who follow other tech news sites. Lifehacker is not the site anymore that discovers new and exciting applications for desktop operating systems.</p><p>Those tech articles are usually rehashes of other site&#8217;s findings, often no longer than 150 or so words long.</p><p>Maybe that&#8217;s life, that the mobile crowd has exploded and that apps and stuff are the new tech news. Don&#8217;t get me wrong. There is certainly a market for mobile apps and news, but it is unfortunately not something that I&#8217;m interested in.</p><p>As a consequence, I have made the decision to remove Lifehacker from my RSS feed. I will still stop by the site occasionally to see what&#8217;s going on. Important or interesting tech news on Lifehacker are covered by many sites that I&#8217;m subscribed to in my RSS reader, which means that I will still be able to read them.</p><p>For me personally, Lifehacker feels a lot like Digg. A site that I once used on a daily basis turned into something that I have little or no interest in anymore.</p><p>Are you a <a
href="http://lifehacker.com/">Lifehacker</a> regular? What&#8217;s your impression then?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/05/03/quo-vadis-lifehacker/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>75</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Lifehacker Hack, What You Need To Do Right Now</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/12/13/lifehacker-hack-what-you-need-to-do-right-now/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/12/13/lifehacker-hack-what-you-need-to-do-right-now/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:55:40 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[gawker media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[hack]]></category> <category><![CDATA[last pass]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[password]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=37926</guid> <description><![CDATA[You may have already read it on other sites that Lifehacker and other Gawker Media properties were compromised. That&#8217;s bad enough for the company and web properties they own, but also for users of the sites. You see, users needed to create an account at Lifehacker and other sites before they were able to comment. [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have already read it on other sites that Lifehacker and other Gawker Media properties were compromised. That&#8217;s bad enough for the company and web properties they own, but also for users of the sites. You see, users needed to create an account at Lifehacker and other sites before they were able to comment. Those who were using Facebook Connect were not affected by the hack, for every other user there is a chance that their login information were indeed compromised.</p><p>According to information posted on <a
href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/exclusive-gawker-hacker-gnosis-explains-method-and-reasoning-behind-his-actions/">Mediaite</a> nearly 1.25 million user accounts were dumped from the databases by a group called Gnosis. The group is currently cracking the database and managed to retrieve 273k passwords so far, some of which are linked to government sites.</p><p>The group promised to release the full site source code and full database dump in the next days. They did release a partial dump already. A total of 2650 users of the database have been using the password &#8220;password&#8221; or &#8220;qwerty&#8221;, two of the most insecure passwords ever. Of those users one had a gov, three a mil and 52 an edu email address.</p><p>Now, what do users need to do that had an account over at Lifehacker. They need to assume that their account was hacked along with the others, and that attackers were able to crack the password.</p><p>First step is to change the password over at the Gawker media site. That&#8217;s all if the username / password combination was only used on that one site. Problems arise for users who use the same username and password combination on all of their web accounts. These users need to change the password on all of their accounts.</p><p>Our tip: Install a password manager like Last Pass that can help in the generation of secure passwords and the storage of them. It is imperative to use a username / password combination only once on the web.</p><p>More information about the hack are available at <a
href="http://downloadsquad.switched.com/2010/12/13/gawker-hack-leads-to-twitter-acai-spam/">Download Squad</a> and <a
href="http://lifehacker.com/#!5712785/">Lifehacker</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/12/13/lifehacker-hack-what-you-need-to-do-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Automatically Minimize Windows After Inactivity</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/05/automatically-minimize-windows-after-inactivity/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/05/automatically-minimize-windows-after-inactivity/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:09:42 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[minimize applications]]></category> <category><![CDATA[minimize to system tray]]></category> <category><![CDATA[swept away]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows software]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=27939</guid> <description><![CDATA[Most computer users work with a basic set of programs most of the time. Some of these programs are active most of the time, web browsers or games for instance, while others, like email clients are mostly inactive and only activated at times. Inactive windows and programs can take up valuable screen space. Most users [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most computer users work with a basic set of programs most of the time. Some of these programs are active most of the time, web browsers or games for instance, while others, like email clients are mostly inactive and only activated at times.</p><p>Inactive windows and programs can take up valuable screen space. Most users minimize the programs to avoid this but it quickly becomes a repetitive process as the program windows need to be minimized whenever the programs have been accessed by the user.</p><p><span
id="more-27939"></span>The free program Swept Away has been designed to automate that process. It will automatically minimize windows that have been inactive for a set amount of time, 300 seconds by default.</p><p>The windows are automatically minimized to the system tray without user interaction. The program options can be changed to increase or reduce the time it takes before the windows are minimized.</p><div
id="attachment_27940" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 388px"><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/automatically-minimize-windows.png" alt="automatically minimize windows" title="automatically minimize windows" width="378" height="251" class="size-full wp-image-27940" /><p
class="wp-caption-text">automatically minimize windows</p></div><p>Swept Away has also an option to whitelist applications so that their windows will never be minimized even if the inactivity period exceeds the configured interval in the software program. Running applications can be excluded from the program&#8217;s system tray icon. A checkmark indicates programs that will not be minimized while the program is running.</p><p>Swept Away has its uses, especially if programs are run on the system that need to be active regularly but are not required to be visible all the time. The program is compatible with most Microsoft Windows operating systems, download is available over at <a
href="http://lifehacker.com/#!255055/lifehacker-code-swept-away-windows">Lifehacker</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/05/automatically-minimize-windows-after-inactivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>File Management Software Belvedere</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/01/file-management-software-belvedere/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/01/file-management-software-belvedere/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[belvedere]]></category> <category><![CDATA[file management]]></category> <category><![CDATA[File Management Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[manage files]]></category> <category><![CDATA[portable software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows software]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8630</guid> <description><![CDATA[Belvedere is at its heart a Windows port of the popular Mac OSX file management software Hazel. It is being developed by Lifehacker&#8217;s own Adam Pash and currently available in version 0.3. Not all functions and features of Hazel have been implemented yet which is demonstrated by the version. Still, some core functionality is available. [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belvedere is at its heart a Windows port of the popular Mac OSX file management software Hazel. It is being developed by Lifehacker&#8217;s own Adam Pash and currently available in version 0.3. Not all functions and features of Hazel have been implemented yet which is demonstrated by the version. Still, some core functionality is available.</p><p>The file management software Belvedere is a portable software program. The source code is provided as well on the program&#8217;s homepage. But what exactly are the features of the file management software?</p><p><a
href="http://lifehacker.com/#!341950/belvedere-automates-your-self">Belvedere</a> in its current stage can be used to define file management rules on certain folders of the system. The software program is capable of moving, copying, renaming, deleting or opening files that match conditions specified by the user.</p><p>Conditions for the name, file extension, size or dates can be configured. It would for instance be no problem to create a rule to move all files with the file extension xyz to another folder. Conditions can be combined so that Belvedere will automatically start the process when any or all of the conditions are met.</p><p><span
id="more-8630"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/file_management_software-500x357.jpg" alt="file management software" title="file management software" width="500" height="357" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8631" /></p><p>Belvedere is running in the background and checking automatically if any files meet the conditions set by the user. If that is the case it will automatically start the action defined by the user. A few things are problematic for now which hopefully will be changed in newer versions. It is for instance not possible to copy or move a file into a new folder if a file of the same name already exists in that folder.</p><p>Users working with extensions should also make sure to only add the extension and not the dot. Belvedere comes with a test button that can test the rules before they are added which is a good indicator if the rules have been properly configured.</p><p>You can download version .3 of the file management software over at Lifehacker.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/01/file-management-software-belvedere/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Minimize Windows To A Single System Tray Icon</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/25/minimize-windows-to-a-single-system-tray-icon/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/25/minimize-windows-to-a-single-system-tray-icon/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:49:28 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[autoit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[minime]]></category> <category><![CDATA[portable software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[system-tray]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows sofware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[windows tools]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8521</guid> <description><![CDATA[Minime (via Lifehacker) is an AutoIt application that can be used to put any open window &#8211; be it program or folder &#8211; into the Windows System Tray. While that is not really something new it comes with a feature that might be interesting to users who run many applications and folders. Minime bundles the [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minime (via <a
href="http://lifehacker.com/#!5097336/minime-minimizes-windows-to-a-single-system-tray-icon">Lifehacker</a>) is an AutoIt application that can be used to put any open window &#8211; be it program or folder &#8211; into the Windows System Tray. While that is not really something new it comes with a feature that might be interesting to users who run many applications and folders.</p><p>Minime bundles the minimized windows into one System Tray icon. If you are the type of user who usually has dozens of icons in the Windows System Tray then you might want to consider switching from your favorite Tray Minimizer application to Minime.</p><p>While running Minime in the background users can make use of the keyboard shortcut [CTRL Shift Z] to minimize the active window to the System Tray. Windows can be reactivated by either choosing a single window or by selecting the Show All option.</p><p><span
id="more-8521"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/minime.jpg" alt="minime" title="minime" width="414" height="238" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8522" /></p><p>Users are reporting problems with 64-bit editions of Windows Vista. Other editions and Windows operating systems should run fine. Minime uses about 6 Megabytes of computer memory when running in the background.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/11/25/minimize-windows-to-a-single-system-tray-icon/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Inline MP3 Player</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/20/google-inline-mp3-player/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/20/google-inline-mp3-player/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Music and Video]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[greasemonkey]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mp3-player]]></category> <category><![CDATA[music]]></category> <category><![CDATA[websites]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=4206</guid> <description><![CDATA[Adam Pash is a Senior Editor at Lifehacker and also someone who likes to code. His latest gorgeous application is a Greasemonkey script called Google Inline MP3 Player which, once installed, displays a [Play] link next to each mp3 link on a website. A click on that Play link embeds an inline mp3 player, more [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Pash is a Senior Editor at Lifehacker and also someone who likes to code. His latest <a
href="http://lifehacker.com/#!391810/google-inline-mp3-player-user-script-streams-linked-mp3s">gorgeous</a> application is a Greasemonkey script called Google Inline MP3 Player which, once installed, displays a [Play] link next to each mp3 link on a website. A click on that Play link embeds an inline mp3 player, more precisely Google Reader&#8217;s MP3 Flash player, directly in the web page providing access to play the mp3 directly without having to download it first.</p><p>The [Play] link changes into a [Hide Player] link which when clicked hides the embedded player again normalizing the website in the progress. This is an excellent way to listen to the first few seconds of a mp3 before making the decision whether you want to download it completely.</p><p>The mp3 is actually downloaded to the user&#8217;s cache which would mean that it would be possible to grab it right of the cache instead of downloading it again. Great script Adam !</p><p><span
id="more-4206"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/google_mp3_inline_player.jpg" alt="google mp3 inline player" title="google mp3 inline player" width="347" height="107" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-4207" /></p><p>I like this way because I can listen to music directly without having to open an external application, in this case the music player.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/20/google-inline-mp3-player/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Regscanner advanced Registry search</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/30/regscanner-advanced-registry-search/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/30/regscanner-advanced-registry-search/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:16:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nirsoft]]></category> <category><![CDATA[regedit]]></category> <category><![CDATA[registry editor]]></category> <category><![CDATA[regscanner]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=3662</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s kinda funny. I was prepared to write about Regscanner all day long when I discovered that Kevin over at Lifehacker did post about the Nirsoft utility as well. If you have ever used the Windows Registry Editor before you might have asked yourself why Microsoft did not implement a better search in the tool, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kinda funny. I was prepared to write about <a
href="http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/regscanner.html">Regscanner</a> all day long when I discovered that Kevin over at <a
href="http://lifehacker.com/373664/find-and-edit-registry-keys-with-regscanner">Lifehacker</a> did post about the Nirsoft utility as well. If you have ever used the Windows Registry Editor before you might have asked yourself why Microsoft did not implement a better search in the tool, they surely should have had enough time to do so in the past years. If you perform a search in Regedit you jump from one entry to the next like the search in text applications. A far better solution for Regedit however would be to display all search results at once which would give the user more control.</p><p>Regscanner is the usual high quality Nirsoft application. You can run it from any location without installation it and it works right out of the box. The Regscanner search form might look a bit intimidating but it is actually providing some much needed functions. It offers all the search functionality of Regedit plus the following advanced options:</p><ul><li>Case Sensitive Search</li><li>Searching for Unicode String in Binary Value</li><li>Exact Matches plus five additional criterias for matching strings.</li><li>Display keys that have been modified in a time range</li><li>Display data of a certain size (in bytes)</li><li>Display only values of a certain type (like DWORD)</li><li>Scan one, several or all Registry base keys</li></ul><p><span
id="more-3662"></span><a
href='http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/regscanner3.jpg'><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/regscanner3-300x213.jpg" alt="regscanner" title="regscanner" width="300" height="213" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3666" /></a></p><p>A double-click on an entry opens the selected key in Regedit. Results can be exported as .reg files which can be imported into Regedit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/30/regscanner-advanced-registry-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Better Youtube Firefox Extension</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/06/better-youtube-firefox-extension/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/06/better-youtube-firefox-extension/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:23:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[better youtube]]></category> <category><![CDATA[firefox-extensions]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/06/better-youtube-firefox-extension/</guid> <description><![CDATA[If there is one Firefox add-on for Youtube that sticks out of the crowd it's the Better Youtube extension by Lifehacker. Better Youtube is a compilation of Greasemonkey scripts compiled together in an add-on which has several advantages. The first is that Greasemonkey does not have to be installed to use the advanced features that the add-on provides, another that you only install one add-on and not five or six Greasemonkey scripts.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is one Firefox add-on for Youtube that sticks out of the crowd it&#8217;s the <a
href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6460/" target="_blank">Better Youtube</a> extension by Lifehacker. Better Youtube is a compilation of Greasemonkey scripts compiled together in an add-on which has several advantages. The first is that Greasemonkey does not have to be installed to use the advanced features that the add-on provides, another that you only install one add-on and not five or six Greasemonkey scripts.</p><p>Let me explain what Better Youtube does. As I said earlier it&#8217;s basically a collection of Greasemonkey scripts that add various features to Youtube. You can enable and disable those features in the options of the add-on which is accessible  in the Tools &gt; Add-ons menu by clicking on the Options button next to the Better Youtube extension.</p><p>The main new feature that has been updated just recently is support for high quality Youtube videos which will be automatically loaded if available. No need to fiddle around with url strings anymore.</p><p><span
id="more-3431"></span> <img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/better_youtube.jpg" alt="better youtube" /></p><p>Five options are available when you click on the options button. You can add download links to each Youtube video which makes it possible to download them, use an alternate player, hide comments, show full video descriptions by default and enable Theater View.</p><p>If you enable the latter all other options become unavailable. Theater mode is very nice if you happen to view high resolution, or higher resolution, videos at Youtube effectively doubling the size of the video.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/06/better-youtube-firefox-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Lifehacker productivity software</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/22/lifehacker-productivity-software/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/22/lifehacker-productivity-software/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:21:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Daniel Pataki</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/22/lifehacker-productivity-software/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I always knew that Lifehacker has some software available like Better Gmail, Better Google Calendar, but they actually have a whole line I didn&#8217;t even know about until a recent post. They have some pretty useful stuff, all of them are &#8220;micro programs&#8221; designed for one specific use. They have a great text replacement utility [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always knew that Lifehacker has some software available like Better Gmail, Better Google Calendar, but they actually have a whole line I didn&#8217;t even know about until a <a
href="http://lifehacker.com/#!347269/lifehackers-exclusive-line-of-productivity-software" title="lifehacker applications">recent post</a>.</p><p>They have some pretty useful stuff, all of them are &#8220;micro programs&#8221; designed for one specific use. They have a great text replacement utility for example, called Texter, which replaces abbreviated text, with the full one. You can use it to substitute &#8220;gH&#8221; with gHacks for example, or &#8220;sig&#8221; with your full signature.</p><p>Swept away is another good idea, it minimizes windows after a specified time when they loose focus. This means that if you have Photoshop always open (like I do), but only use it every hour or so, it will minimize itself. This is great for me, since it removes clutter from my desktop and enables me to actually work.</p><p><span
id="more-2955"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/lifehacker.gif" alt="lifehacker logo" align="left" />The post also points you to their great Greasmonkey compilation Firefox extensions like Better Gmail, Better Flickr and Better Youtube, all of which give you added functionality for these web applications. Better Gmail allows you integrate Google Reader for example, or change macros, and other cool features.</p><p>Overall, Lifehacker has produced some highly specialized, but quite usable and helpful applications. They are all free to use, so go nuts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/22/lifehacker-productivity-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Hide Menus in Fullscreen with Autohide for Firefox</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/28/hide-menus-in-fullscreen-with-autohide-for-firefox/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/28/hide-menus-in-fullscreen-with-autohide-for-firefox/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:39:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[add on]]></category> <category><![CDATA[addon]]></category> <category><![CDATA[autohide]]></category> <category><![CDATA[browser]]></category> <category><![CDATA[firefox-extensions]]></category> <category><![CDATA[freeware]]></category> <category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category> <category><![CDATA[tip]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/28/hide-menus-in-fullscreen-with-autohide-for-firefox/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I was reading about Autohide yesterday over at lifehacker and had the plan to try it today to see if it was a useful add-on for mozilla firefox. Autohide manipulates the interface of firefox when entering fullscreen mode (F11) - you can select to (auto) hide certain bars and menu entries to have more space for the website itself. The following settings can be changed:]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading about <a
target="_blank" title="autohide" href="http://www.krickelkrackel.de/autohide/">Autohide</a> yesterday over at <a
target="_blank" title="lifehacker" href="http://lifehacker.com/#!217327/download-of-the-day-autohide-firefox">lifehacker</a> and had the plan to try it today to see if it was a useful add-on for mozilla firefox. Autohide manipulates the interface of firefox when entering fullscreen mode (F11) &#8211; you can select to (auto) hide certain bars and menu entries to have more space for the website itself. The following settings can be changed:</p><p>You may choose to always show the status bar or only on activity, you may hide all toolbars that are currently installed including the google and stumbleupon toolbar if they are installed on your system. The same can be done for the tab bar and the windows taskbar. Now, whenever you move your mouse over an hidden item (such as the menu bar) it becomes visible and you can interact with it normally.</p><p><span
id="more-948"></span>The direct opposite of hidding certain items can also be configured which would be show always. If you can&#8217;t live without the tab bar and status bar you can select to have them always on. They never hide when you press F11 and go into fullscreen mode.</p><p>This application can benefit users with older displays and users who like to have all the information present on the screen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/11/28/hide-menus-in-fullscreen-with-autohide-for-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
