<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; JavaScript performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/javascript-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Opera 10 Alpha Passes Acid 3 Test</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/04/opera-10-alpha-passes-acid-3-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/04/opera-10-alpha-passes-acid-3-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid 3 test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera 10 alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=8714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A first alpha preview of the upcoming web browser Opera 10 has been released by the Opera development team. Among the most notable difference to previous versions is that the browser is passing the Acid 3 test with a score of 100/100. Opera 10 makes use of the new Presto 2.2 rendering engine which improves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A first alpha preview of the upcoming web browser <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/category/browsing/opera/">Opera</a> 10 has been released by the Opera development team. Among the most notable difference to previous versions is that the browser is passing the Acid 3 test with a score of 100/100. Opera 10 makes use of the new Presto 2.2 rendering engine which improves speed, performance and security significantly.</p>
<p>The Opera team speaks of a 30% speed increase over the previous version of the rendering engine. A test of the JavaScript performance of Opera 10 revealed astonishing results. Opera 10 completed the<br />
<a href="http://celtickane.com/webdesign/jsspeedarchive.php">Web Browser Javascript Benchmark</a> in 188ms which is very fast compared to <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Firefox</a> 3.0.4 which needed 349ms, Safari 3.1.2 with 344ms or Opera 9.52 with 420ms. It&#8217;s obviously not fair to compare a development release with web browsers who have already been released but it should give anyone an understanding about the performance increase in this new Opera version.</p>
<p>What else is new in Opera 10? Opera 10 adds a long requested inline spellchecker and an interesting auto-update function which can update Opera automatically whenever a new version has been released.</p>
<p><span id="more-8714"></span><img src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/opera10-500x333.jpg" alt="opera 10" title="opera 10" width="500" height="333" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8715" /></p>
<p>Web developers will like the support of web fonts, SVG and opacity through RGBA and HSLA. The current release schedule aims for a beta in early 2009 and a final release of Opera 10 later that year.</p>
<p>Interested users can download the Opera 10 alpha release for <a href="http://www.opera.com/browser/next/">Windows</a>, <a href="http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/u100a1.html">Linux</a> or <a href="http://snapshot.opera.com/mac/m100a1.html">Mac</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/acid-3-test/" title="acid 3 test" rel="tag">acid 3 test</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/javascript-performance/" title="JavaScript performance" rel="tag">JavaScript performance</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/javascript-test/" title="javascript test" rel="tag">javascript test</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/opera/" title="opera" rel="tag">opera</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/opera-10/" title="opera 10" rel="tag">opera 10</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/opera-10-alpha/" title="opera 10 alpha" rel="tag">opera 10 alpha</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/opera-browser/" title="opera browser" rel="tag">opera browser</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/web-browser/" title="web browser" rel="tag">web browser</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/13/web-browser-opera-turbo-preview/" title="Web Browser: Opera Turbo Preview (March 13, 2009)">Web Browser: Opera Turbo Preview</a> (6)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/02/web-browser-opera-face-gestures/" title="Web Browser: Opera Face Gestures (April 2, 2009)">Web Browser: Opera Face Gestures</a> (11)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/03/opera-10-beta/" title="Opera 10 Beta (June 3, 2009)">Opera 10 Beta</a> (9)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/12/opera-will-reinvent-the-internet-on-june-16/" title="Opera Will Reinvent The Internet On June 16 (June 12, 2009)">Opera Will Reinvent The Internet On June 16</a> (13)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/02/14/opera-turbo/" title="Opera Turbo (February 14, 2009)">Opera Turbo</a> (15)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/04/opera-10-alpha-passes-acid-3-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test Your Browser&#8217;s JavaScript Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunspider test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cnet ran some tests on the JavaScript performance of selected browsers like the latest Firefox version, Firefox beta and Google Chrome builds. JavaScript performance was in the news since Google and the Mozilla Firefox development team announced improvements in JavaScript performance. 
Cnet used the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark to test browser performance of the browsers. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cnet ran some tests on the JavaScript performance of selected browsers like the latest <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Firefox</a> version, Firefox beta and Google Chrome builds. JavaScript performance was in the news since Google and the <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/">Mozilla Firefox</a> development team announced improvements in JavaScript performance. </p>
<p><a href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-driver.html">Cnet</a> used the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark to test browser performance of the browsers. There are other factors that have an impact on JavaScript performance like the processing power of the computer system.</p>
<p>The results were that the latest Firefox 3.1 beta with the new JavaScript engine TraceMonkey was the fastest with a score of 2,257, followed by Chrome with 2,904, Firefox 3 beta 1 without TraceMonkey with 4,233, Safari 3.1.2 with 6,351 and <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/internet-explorer/">Internet Explorer</a> 8 Beta 2 at the end with a score of 9,025.</p>
<p><span id="more-7701"></span>Cnet failed  to test any version of <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/category/browsing/opera/">Opera</a> and should probably have tested the latest nightly test of Safari instead. Here are the results that a Windows XP service pack 3 with a Intel 8400 Wolfdale processor and 4 Gigabytes of computer memory. </p>
<ul>
<li>Firefox 3.1 Beta 1 without TraceMonkey- 1800</li>
<li>Firefox 3.1 Beta 1 with Tracemonkey 1817</li>
<li>Firefox 3.03 &#8211; 2139 </li>
<li>Opera 9.6 &#8211; 2736</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit surprising that Firefox without TraceMonkey was faster than Firefox with it enabled. It could be due to the fact that the portable version of Firefox has been used to run the tests. But the interesting question is, how does your browser compare? You need to run at least two browsers to be able to tell how it compares to the other browser.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that JavaScript performance is not everything and that page loading time is dependent on additional factors.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/firefox/" title="firefox" rel="tag">firefox</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/google-chrome/" title="google chrome" rel="tag">google chrome</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/internet-explorer/" title="internet-explorer" rel="tag">internet-explorer</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/javascript/" title="javascript" rel="tag">javascript</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/javascript-performance/" title="JavaScript performance" rel="tag">JavaScript performance</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/performance/" title="performance" rel="tag">performance</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/safari/" title="safari" rel="tag">safari</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/sunspider-test/" title="sunspider test" rel="tag">sunspider test</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/04/xenocode-web-browser-sandbox/" title="Xenocode Web Browser Sandbox (April 4, 2009)">Xenocode Web Browser Sandbox</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/21/web-browser-popularity/" title="Web Browser Popularity (March 21, 2009)">Web Browser Popularity</a> (51)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/06/21/web-browser-memory-usage-benchmark-gets-it-all-wrong/" title="Web Browser Memory Usage Benchmark Gets It All Wrong (June 21, 2009)">Web Browser Memory Usage Benchmark Gets It All Wrong</a> (15)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/09/15/web-browser-have-impact-on-battery-life/" title="Web Browser Have Impact On Battery Life (September 15, 2009)">Web Browser Have Impact On Battery Life</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/12/14/web-browser-benchmark-comparison/" title="Web Browser Benchmark Comparison (December 14, 2008)">Web Browser Benchmark Comparison</a> (19)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/10/17/test-your-browsers-javascript-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
