Now the interesting question that arises is why they would want to educate their customers. My first assumption would be that they, as a cable provider, want to reduce the average bandwidth usage of their customers in an effort to maximize the profits from their infrastructure. Usually filesharers have a much higher bandwidth demand than the usual Internet user with the exception of video portal junkies maybe.

Reducing the amount of filesharers that are their customers would definitely reduce the bandwidth bill of the ISP. Cable is a shared connection as well which could increase the speed of all customers as well.

The interesting question will be how they will pick the customers that will receive the warnings. Will they actively monitor P2P networks, will they only react when the BPI sends them a list, will they verify those lists ? What about false positives ? Someone who is download music from Jamendo using the Bittorrent protocol. Will he receive a warning as well ? What about secure Usenet connections ? IRC, FTP, file hosts. How the hell will they be able to determine that a file that is being transferred is indeed a copyright violation ? Filenames alone are without doubt not the safest way of determining that. So, how will they do that ?

My second assumption would be that Virgin Media could have some ties with the BPI or a company that is a member of the BPI. I really do not have enough time to research this so if anyone could help me out it would be appreciated.

Related posts

• You Are Sharing Files (4)
• Why I wont be using Qtrax (7)
• What’s Your Take on Downloading? (17)
• uTorrent 1.7 beta (6)
• Test if your ISP is throttling Bittorrent Traffic (3)

I usually restart my router to be on the safe side but that’s it. Sometimes you can make a connection to the Internet but that connection feels slow, you get disconnections and websites that are not loading properly.

One way to find out if the problem is located on your side is to perform a tracert command to the target server. If that tracert times out you pretty much know the IP address of the server responsible for that along with information about the country the server is in.

This is also the basic approach of Hubble, a service that monitors Internet reachability in real-time. Instead of using one tracert at a time they send out more than 100k every 15 minutes to monitor reachability problems throughout the world using a Google Maps mashup to provide a map of so called black holes, meaning servers that are unresponsive or have a reduced reachability.

The interesting information for the users are the IP addresses or ranges of those servers and the country column of the table. Sorting the column by country reveals problematic server at a glance which can help determining if the problem is located at your end.

Related posts

• Remote Server Monitoring Software DreamSys Server Monitor (4)
• Play your MP3 collection remotely (0)
• eToolz Network Toolset (1)
• YubNub a social internet command line (2)
• Wolfram Alpha Gets Its First Core Update After Launch (3)

The web application is simulating a Bittorrent transfer between the user’s computer and the web server the application is running from to determine if the ISP is tampering with the Bittorrent traffic. The test can detect if the ISP is throttling all Bittorrent traffic, throttling all traffic at well known Bittorrent ports or throttling Bittorrent traffic at well known Bittorrent ports.

The user has the choice to perform a full test that takes roughly seven minutes or a fast test that lasts four minutes. The servers seem to be overrun currently by worldwide users and it might happen that you will receive a message that the servers are currently busy.

If you take a look at the results map you will notice a high concentration of ISPs that are throttling Bittorrent traffic in the United States and Singapore.

All blocked transfers were observed in the upstream direction (i.e., when the client host attempted to upload data to one of our Glasnost servers). No host observed blocking for downstream BitTorrent transfers.

We found widespread blocking of BitTorrent transfers only in the U.S. and Singapore. Interestingly, even within these countries, blocking was observed by hosts belonging to a handful of large ISPs.

The Danes and Brits seem to have tested the web application intensively because their countries are almost not visible anymore. What about your ISP, is it throttling Bittorrent traffic ?

Related posts

• Bad ISPs sorted by Country (3)
• Torrent2exe makes Bittorrent a tad easier (4)
• Tired of fake torrents ? Block the sources (8)
• The Piratebay To Introduce Paid Subscriptions (14)
• The Piratebay Sold To Swedish Software Company (5)

This brings up some interesting moral but also legal questions. Website owners have no idea, and obviously no control, that ads are displayed on their websites. The problem here is that they probably do not have the means to verify that ads are displayed either unless someone would come up with a log that showed which websites have been affected by this practice. Customers however are on the other end of the spectrum. Their traffic is meddled with and are shown ads that are probably specifically targeted to increase the success rate.

Some ISP names have been published by the researchers already: RedMoon, Mesa Networks, MetroFi and XO Communications with the last being one of the largest ISPs in the country and only in that list because of a smaller reseller according to an XO spokesman. It will be interesting to access the full list of Internet Service Providers that inject ads in websites without their customers consent.

Related posts

• Why some ISPs turn against their own customers (5)
• Test Your Internet Speed With Down Tester (7)
• Test if your ISP is throttling Bittorrent Traffic (3)
• Piratebay fights back (2)
• Monitoring Internet Reachability in Real-Time (6)

ISPs use a variety of techniques to prevent their clients from using P2P networks like Bittorrent. Limiting the clients bandwidth is just one of them. Other techniques limit the bandwidth during a certain period of the day, prevent the user from downloading files with the .torrent extension, prevent seeding while some even cause unresolvable NAT problems.

The developers of the Bittorrent client Azureus have created a plugin for their application that gathers information “relating to network interference, in particular, to shed light on which ISPs are forging RST packets. Every ten minutes, the plug-in detects from your computer the number of reset tcp connections, and then displays the results to you.”

Those information can then be anonymously shared with a central server which in return leads to an updated table of Bad ISPs but also gives the Bittorrent community more firepower against those ISPs.

I like the second sentence on the page with the table, it says: “If you are using one of the following ISPs, please consider finding a new, better one.” That’s exactly what one should do and what I would consider doing even if I would not be affected by it.

The United States, Canada and the United Kingdom lead the table currently with several ISPs that impose some sort of restrictions on their users. Interesting read.

Related posts

• Test if your ISP is throttling Bittorrent Traffic (3)
• Torrent2exe makes Bittorrent a tad easier (4)
• Tired of fake torrents ? Block the sources (8)
• The Piratebay To Introduce Paid Subscriptions (14)
• The Piratebay Sold To Swedish Software Company (5)

We all remember that AOL released similar data last year using a weak method to anonymize the data. It was possible to identify certain users that were conducting specific searches. The exact nature of the data that is being sold to the marketing companies is not known yet. Experts estimate that the ISPs receive about $0.40 per month per user which totals to $4.80 per year.

An ISP with 10000 users would gain $48000 per year for the data that they sell. Enough money to forget about the privacy rights of their customers. The question remains: how can you find out if your ISP is selling clickstream data ? You could try and call them and ask them directly but the guys from the hotlines probably do not even know what clickstream data is. A better way would be to call a representative or a official data protection officer.

The only possible way to counter this would be to use encryption, specifically encrypted vpns that make it impossible for the ISP to log what their users are doing.

Related posts

• XeroBank Browser (12)
• Why some ISPs turn against their own customers (5)
• Web Proxy Server List (62)
• UK. Sensitive Information. Need We Say More? (2)
• Track Me Not Firefox Extension (3)

Piratebay also published the php code of the script that blocks the ISP from accessing the website and asks other sites to join in and ban that ISP. Infocider took the liberty to translate the press release into English. The intention seems to be to convince customers of Perspektiv to change the ISP because of their ban of the Russian mp3 website allofmp3.

Do you think that this will work ? I’m not sure yet, if enough websites join the party it could work. Would be interesting to know how many of the users of Perspektiv are actually using the Piratebay. Can you fight fire with fire or should you better try and eliminate the oxygen instead ?

I think another method would be to use a similar script to inform the users of that ISP of what their ISP is doing and offer them ways to change to another ISP. Integrate a ISP search script, think that would actually work better.

Related posts

• And so the Pirates win the day (1)
• Youtorrent (2)
• Yahoo bans The Pirate Bay (10)
• Why some ISPs turn against their own customers (5)
• Tired of fake torrents ? Block the sources (8)