<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; google service</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/google-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Google Launches G.Co, Url Shortener For Internal Pages</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/07/18/google-launches-g-co-url-shortener-for-internal-pages/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/07/18/google-launches-g-co-url-shortener-for-internal-pages/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:27:18 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[g.co]]></category> <category><![CDATA[goo.gl]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[url shortener]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=47976</guid> <description><![CDATA[URL shorteners are so yesterday, well that is my opinion. Regardless of it, it seems that companies still like the idea of turning a web address into an often smaller alternative. It makes sense on Twitter where users are limited to 140 chars, and maybe for mobile use, but beyond that? Google seems to believe [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>URL shorteners are so yesterday, well that is my opinion. Regardless of it, it seems that companies still like the idea of turning a web address into an often smaller alternative. It makes sense on Twitter where users are limited to 140 chars, and maybe for mobile use, but beyond that?</p><p>Google seems to believe that it is beneficial to have another url shortener. The company announced the launch of the url shortener g.co, which is a new tool only for internal Google products or services.</p><p>Google users do not get the chance to create g.co urls, even if they would point to Google services. Only Google will make use of those urls in their products and services.</p><p>The only plausible reason for launching a second service is security. It is more likely that users will trust links if they now that their destination will be a Google owned property and service.</p><p>How does this new service compare to the existing goo.gl url shortener? The latter is a public service that anyone can use to shorten any kind of url.</p><p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/g-co-url-shortener-google.png" alt="g-co-url-shortener-google" title="g-co-url-shortener-google" width="600" height="179" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-47977" /></p><p>To put it short:</p><ul><li>g.co &#8211; Only point to Google services, no option to create</li><li>goo.gl &#8211; Can point to all web addresses, public creation</li></ul><p>Gary Briggs, Google VP of Consumer Marketing <a
href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/gco-official-url-shortcut-for-google.html">confirms</a> that the creation of a second internal url shortener is trust and security.</p><blockquote><p>The shorter a URL, the easier it is to share and remember. The downside is, you often can’t tell what website you’re going to be redirected to. We’ll only use g.co to send you to webpages that are owned by Google, and only we can create g.co shortcuts. That means you can visit a g.co shortcut confident you will always end up at a page for a Google product or service.</p></blockquote><p>It is however unclear where and how the new internal url shortener will be used by Google in the future. All we know at this point in time is that Google will start rolling out g.co urls soon.</p><p>What&#8217;s your take on this new url shortener in particular and url shortening services in general. Are they needed on today&#8217;s Internet?</p><p>I actually prefer the way Microsoft handles longer urls over url shorteners. Microsoft is using the go.microsoft.com subdomain to shorten long urls on their websites. The main advantage of this is that users see the Microsoft.com url in the address. The redirection itself is handled in the background.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2011/07/18/google-launches-g-co-url-shortener-for-internal-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Offering Translated Search Results</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/30/google-offering-translated-search-results/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/30/google-offering-translated-search-results/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:56:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google search]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google translate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category> <category><![CDATA[translate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[translated search]]></category> <category><![CDATA[web search]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=7316</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Google Translate service was known for a long time to translate text and websites from one language to the other. The current version features 34 languages from English over German to Vietnamese. Chances are good that Google Translate can translate the text or website into a language that the visitor can understand. What most [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Google Translate service was known for a long time to translate text and websites from one language to the other. The current version features 34 languages from English over German to Vietnamese. Chances are good that Google Translate can translate the text or website into a language that the visitor can understand.</p><p>What most users do not know is that Google expanded the service recently offering not only on the fly translations but also translated search results. The new <a
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_s?hl=en">feature</a> is called Translated Search and it works the following way.</p><p>The user enters a search term in a language of his choosing, picks his language and the language of the websites that he wants to search. Google will automatically translate the words that the user entered and perform a search on the search inventory that meet the locale requirement.</p><p><span
id="more-7316"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/google_translated_search-500x130.jpg" alt="google translated search" title="google translated search" width="500" height="130" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7317" /></p><p>The search results will be processed and translated before they are displayed on the user&#8217;s computer screen. The results are divided into two columns. The left column contains the translated preview of the website and the right the original text.</p><p>A click on a result in the left column will load the translated version of the website while a click on the right will load the original version. This feature is excellent for users who want to search in a language that they do not speak.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/09/30/google-offering-translated-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Trends</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/05/13/google-trends/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/05/13/google-trends/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 06:18:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google service]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google trends]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2006/05/13/google-trends/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Google Trends has been live for a few days and it´s time to play around with this new google service and find out what it´s all about. By entering one or more search terms you see a graph that shows the search volume and the news reference volume for about two years. This in itself isn´t that exciting but the feature to compare results by searching for multiple terms is. You could for instance compare linux distributions or windows, linux and macintosh.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/trends">Google Trends</a> has been live for a few days and it´s time to play around with this new google service and find out what it´s all about. By entering one or more search terms you see a graph that shows the search volume and the news reference volume for about two years. This in itself isn´t that exciting but the feature to compare results by searching for multiple terms is. You could for instance <a
target="_blank" href="http://www.ducea.com/2006/05/12/linux-distributions-trends/">compare linux distributions</a> or windows, linux and macintosh.</p><p>All you need to do is enter one or more search terms seperated by commas and google will process the request and display the results. If there have been enough searches for the term. The results also show which cities, regions and languages did the most searches for the terms.</p><p><span
id="more-489"></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2006/05/13/google-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
