<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; forbes</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/forbes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Forbes: Why Web Pirates Can&#8217;t Be Touched</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/17/forbes-why-web-pirates-cant-be-touched/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/17/forbes-why-web-pirates-cant-be-touched/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 19:31:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Music Industry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[P2p]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[allofmp3]]></category> <category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category> <category><![CDATA[internet piracy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[pirate bay]]></category> <category><![CDATA[the piratebay]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/17/forbes-why-web-pirates-cant-be-touched/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I'm always a bit worried when a respected news magazine tries to report about topics like Piracy for instance. Most of the time the articles are a bunch of assumptions taken from official biased sources like the RIAA to come to the conclusion how badly piracy affects businesses. Now it is Forbes trying to tell us why web pirates can't be touched and it begins - who would have thought about that - with The Pirate Bay. They come to the conclusion that The Pirate Bay is shielded by Sweden's lax copyright laws and international immunity. I personally think that it is a matter of perspective. The laws might be lax from the standpoint of an American company but tight for a Swedish one. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always a bit worried when a respected news magazine tries to report about topics like Piracy for instance. Most of the time the articles are a bunch of assumptions taken from official biased sources like the RIAA to come to the conclusion how badly piracy affects businesses. Now it is Forbes trying to tell us <a
href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/04/youtube-piratesbay-piracy-tech-cx_ag_0507pirates.html" target="_blank">why web pirates can&#8217;t be touched</a> and it begins &#8211; who would have thought about that &#8211; with The Pirate Bay. They come to the conclusion that The Pirate Bay is shielded by Sweden&#8217;s lax copyright laws and international immunity. I personally think that it is a matter of perspective. The laws might be lax from the standpoint of an American company but tight for a Swedish one.</p><p>It is not illegal in Sweden to link to a torrent file and I never quite understood why linking to something would be the same as actually downloading it. This would in essence mean that selling weapons should be equivalent to killing someone with weapons. Another prime example is the paragraph about allofmp3, the Russian mp3 provider operating perfectly legal in Russia. Forbes sees it this way:</p><p><span
id="more-1562"></span><em>Not every scheme to evade intellectual property laws is so subtle. The music-selling site AllofMP3 uses a simpler business model: Base your company in Russia, steal music from American labels and sell it cheaply.</em></p><p>Again, the service is perfectly legal in Russia. This is actually globalization, something that all companies are so keen of. Only that this time the consumer is profiting from it and not the global companies who sell their goods worldwide, buy cheap labor in poor countries and give a **** about the country that they are based in.</p><p>I also find it quite fascinating that Forbes is directly linking to websites of copyright offenders. Isn&#8217;t it illegal to do so according to their logic ? (Linking to torrents is illegal but linking to websites that host torrents is not ?)</p><p>What&#8217;s your take ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/05/17/forbes-why-web-pirates-cant-be-touched/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
