<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>gHacks Technology News &#124; Latest Tech News, Software And Tutorials &#187; data security</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/data-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ghacks.net</link> <description>A technology news blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>UK. Sensitive Information. Need We Say More?</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[bob quick]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data leak]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[information]]></category> <category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/</guid> <description><![CDATA[The massive increase in data collection throughout the world has not led to responsible data storage laws. That is an imbalance that becomes obvious especially in one country these days. The UK is amassing heaps of data about their citizens for their fight against terrorism (and other causes) but is failing miserably over and over [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/secret.png" alt="secret" title="secret" width="156" height="91" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-11944" />The massive increase in data collection throughout the world has not led to responsible data storage laws. That is an imbalance that becomes obvious especially in one country these days. The UK is amassing heaps of data about their citizens for their fight against terrorism (and other causes) but is failing miserably over and over again when it comes to securing that data.</p><p>Think of past stories like top secret information in a digital camera that got sold for a few pounds on eBay or the discovery of an USB stick outside a pub containing information about 12 million British citizens.</p><p>This time it was mere paper that was responsible for a data leak. Most users would think that pre-computer age politicians would know how to handle at least secure information on paper properly. This is apparently not the case as police chief Bob Quick managed to carry a document marked secret in public which immediately caught the attention of bystanding photographers.</p><p><span
id="more-11945"></span><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/robert-quick-300x276.jpg" alt="bob quick" title="bob quick" width="300" height="276" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-11943" /></p><p>The document, which can be viewed on the <a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/bob-quick-terror-raids-leak">Guardian&#8217;s</a> website contained information about an anti-terrorist raid. The details were extensive including names, addresses and command structures. The raid had to be conducted in bright daylight because of the security leak.</p><p>As Dante, who send me a link to the story points out: &#8220;It&#8217;s not just electronic security that<br
/> counts. It&#8217;’s also what happens when a user prints out the data.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/12/uk-sensitive-information-need-we-say-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Back up your files to a secure remote server with Carbonite</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/back-up-your-files-to-a-secure-remote-server-with-carbonite/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/back-up-your-files-to-a-secure-remote-server-with-carbonite/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:35:43 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category> <category><![CDATA[back up]]></category> <category><![CDATA[carbonite]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[discount]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mozy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[offer code]]></category> <category><![CDATA[online backup]]></category> <category><![CDATA[subscription.com]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/back-up-your-files-to-a-secure-remote-server-with-carbonite/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Everyone should back their data up in case their computer suddenly fails or is even lost or stolen. Many will back their data up on mediums like external hard drives, but it requires a certain amount of disciple to remember to hook your laptop up to one. Another problem with backing data up on such [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img
src="http://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/carbonite.jpg" alt="carbonite" title="carbonite" width="260" height="59" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-11861" />Everyone should back their data up in case their computer suddenly fails or is even lost or stolen. Many will back their data up on mediums like external hard drives, but it requires a certain amount of disciple to remember to hook your laptop up to one. Another problem with backing data up on such mediums is that they can be corrupted or lost. Since the advent of fast internet connections, it has therefore become possible to back data up on to online backup services.</p><p>There are two main online backup services: <a
href="http://mozy.com/">Mozy</a> and <a
href="http://www.carbonite.com/en/default.aspx">Carbonite</a>. Both offer a similar service: they upload files differentially and incrementally (as they are updated or made) to a server and those files can then be retrieved. Both are now also available for Windows and OS X. Prices are similar, although Mozy does offer users 2GB free of charge.</p><p>Carbonite offers a 15 day free trial, where you don&#8217;t even have to input your credit card information. This, like a regular subscription, allows you an unlimited amount of storage. Unlike a paid user, free trial users can&#8217;t upload music or movies, quite understandably. Paid users have no issue though.</p><p><span
id="more-11860"></span>I personally use Carbonite, but wouldn&#8217;t advise anyone against Mozy. Carbonite was quite simple to set-up, my only complaints are that it didn&#8217;t automatically configure the OS X firewall or my ports and a few minor user interface issues. I expect that it is much more polished on Windows, as their OS X version is a recent release.</p><p>Carbonite also provide remote access, so you can access your backed up files anywhere. This is useful if you need a file off your home PC at work, for example.</p><p>Uploading is fairly fast. After I configured my firewall and ports correctly, I managed to get a couple of gigabytes uploaded in one night. That is impressive considering I&#8217;m on a relatively slow (2Mbps downstream) ADSL2 connection.</p><p>Carbonite&#8217;s customer support solved any of my problems but I felt a lot of the dialog was scripted and for some reason it all seemed a little impersonal. Still, they provided me with solutions in a reasonable timeframe in a courteous manner.</p><p>Now, pricing. Carbonite is $55/year and Mozy (for home users) is $4.95/month. However, it is possible to easily save 20% on this through using Subscription.com . A couple of extra clicks can save $11 on Carbonite and 15% on Mozy. <a
href="http://www.subscription.com/software/online-backup/">Go through this page for a Mozy and Carbonite offer code</a>. I did this and found it a remarkably easy process.</p><p><strong>Disclosure: Subscription.com reimbursed my purchasing a Carbonite licence under the condition that I reviewed it on my personal weblog. I was in no way required to show bias or blog about Carbonite on gHacks, I simply chose to as it&#8217;s a good service.</strong></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/04/09/back-up-your-files-to-a-secure-remote-server-with-carbonite/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Google Docs Shares Documents Without Permisson</title><link>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/07/google-docs-shares-documents-without-permisson/</link> <comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/07/google-docs-shares-documents-without-permisson/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 09:57:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Martin Brinkmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[data security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[docs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Google]]></category> <category><![CDATA[google docs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Online Services]]></category> <category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Security]]></category> <category><![CDATA[web services]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/?p=10992</guid> <description><![CDATA[Cloud computing is a buzz word. It has been made popular with services like Google Docs which allow users to store their documents on a server on the Internet. While it surely is comfortable to have the documents stored on servers with the ability to work with them and share them with trusted individuals words [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloud computing is a buzz word. It has been made popular with services like Google Docs which allow users to store their documents on a server on the Internet. While it surely is comfortable to have the documents stored on servers with the ability to work with them and share them with trusted individuals words of concern has been raised lately. Most of the concern was security and privacy related. Users are basically handing over their documents to a third party. They gain accessibility but lose lots of control over their documents.</p><p>A letter that has been send out by the Google Docs team seems to have made the worst case scenario true for some users of the online service. According to <a
href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/03/07/huge-google-privacy-blunder-shares-your-docs-without-permission/">Techcrunch</a> who received a copy of a letter that has been send out the following happened: The Google Docs team identified a bug in their online service that may have caused the sharing of documents without the knowledge or permission of the user.</p><p>&#8220;This inadvertent sharing was limited to people with whom you, or a collaborator with sharing rights, had previously shared a document. The issue only occurred if you, or a collaborator with sharing rights, selected multiple documents and presentations from the documents list and changed the sharing permissions. This issue affected documents and presentations, but not spreadsheets.&#8221;</p><p><span
id="more-10992"></span>While it is unclear as to how many users have actually been affected by the bug it does outline the problems of storing documents, files and information on the Internet. There is always a chance that the documents will fall into hands that they are not intended for.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2009/03/07/google-docs-shares-documents-without-permisson/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
