<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gHacks technology news &#187; court-ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/court-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghacks.net</link>
	<description>A technology blog covering software, mobile phones, gadgets, security, the Internet and other relevant areas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ISPs don&#8217;t have to give up names in civil cases</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[P2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-ruling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news that European Internet Service Providers did not have to give up names of customers to members of the Music Industry and other organizations in civil cases hit the Internet by storm. Everyone seemed to think that this was a major victory for consumer rights. It probably is in some countries but let me explain how this is easily circumvented, at least in Germany.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news that European Internet Service Providers did not have to give up names of customers to members of the Music Industry and other organizations in civil cases <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/01/29/2025257.shtml">hit</a> the Internet by storm. Everyone seemed to think that this was a major victory for consumer rights. It probably is in some countries but let me explain how this is easily circumvented, at least in Germany.</p>
<p>German Internet Service Providers did not give out their customer names in civil cases even before the ruling of the EU court. Copyright infringement is however a criminal offense in Germany which means that the companies file a criminal lawsuit, the State is investigation, getting information about the IP in question and the companies simply take a look into the documents to find out the real name and contact information about that person.</p>
<p>After they get the name they file a civil case and the criminal lawsuit is normally closed because of minor offenses. With the name however they can &#8211; and do &#8211; sue the user whose IP they detected.</p>
<p><span id="more-3038"></span>Is copyright infringement a civil or criminal offense in your country ?</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/copyright-infringement/" title="copyright infringement" rel="tag">copyright infringement</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/court-ruling/" title="court-ruling" rel="tag">court-ruling</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/p2p/" title="P2p" rel="tag">P2p</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/court-orders-rapidshare-to-take-preemptive-measures-against-copyright-infringement/" title="Court orders Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement (January 29, 2008)">Court orders Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/08/youtorrent/" title="Youtorrent (January 8, 2008)">Youtorrent</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/06/09/why-some-isps-turn-against-their-own-customers/" title="Why some ISPs turn against their own customers (June 9, 2008)">Why some ISPs turn against their own customers</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/why-i-wont-be-using-qtrax/" title="Why I wont be using Qtrax (January 29, 2008)">Why I wont be using Qtrax</a> (7)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/03/26/what%e2%80%99s-your-take-on-downloading/" title="What’s Your Take on Downloading? (March 26, 2008)">What’s Your Take on Downloading?</a> (17)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/30/isps-dont-have-to-give-up-names-in-civil-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court orders Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/court-orders-rapidshare-to-take-preemptive-measures-against-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/court-orders-rapidshare-to-take-preemptive-measures-against-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[P2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapidshare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrentfreak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/court-orders-rapidshare-to-take-preemptive-measures-against-copyright-infringement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was under the impression that courts are ruled by fact and reason but it becomes apparent that some judges are not able to cope with technology and the fast changing online world. A court order issued on January 23th by the District court of Dusseldorf, Germany ordered Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement. This does look nicely on paper but once you take a look at the practical implementation it is a (nearly) impossible task.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that courts are ruled by fact and reason but it becomes apparent that some judges are not able to cope with technology and the fast changing online world. A court order issued on January 23th by the District court of Dusseldorf, Germany ordered <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/04/5-rapidshare-search-engines/">Rapidshare</a> to take <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/rapidshare-to-be-forced-to-shut-down-following-court-defeat-080129/">preemptive</a> measures against copyright infringement (<a href="http://www.gema.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/pressemitteilung/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=688&#038;tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=73&#038;cHash=2c827de5c9">article on Gema website</a>) This does look nicely on paper but once you take a look at the practical implementation it is a (nearly) impossible task.</p>
<p>The court basically told Rapidshare to make a distinction between copyrighted and free files on their servers. This would mean that Rapidhshare has to have a master list of all copyrighted files, be it music, film, documents and even dlls to be able to make a decision. Documents, films and music have to be played to be sure that it is indeed copyrighted material because a name could imply that it is but nothings for sure until you checked the file manually.</p>
<p>A simple name comparison is not enough to determine if a file is infringing copyright. Not all files are named properly as well, some are zipped and contain many files, some are secured with a password. How is Rapidshare going to check on all of these files ? They can&#8217;t. It is simply impossible to follow the courts order and the judges seem to have taken this into account by saying that Rapidshare would have to follow this order even if it would mean that they had to cease offering it at all.</p>
<p><span id="more-3029"></span>The order will most likely be appealed and we have seen other outcomes from regional courts that basically said that Rapidshare did not have to take preemptive measures. </p>
<p>Rapidshare will continue operating for now and it could very well take a few years until a final decision has been made by the Federal Court. The solution if the court would rule in favor of the copyright holders would be to either stop the service or move to another country like those DVD copy producers did when German courts hit hard on them.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/court-ruling/" title="court-ruling" rel="tag">court-ruling</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/file-hosting/" title="file hosting" rel="tag">file hosting</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/p2p/" title="P2p" rel="tag">P2p</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/rapidshare/" title="rapidshare" rel="tag">rapidshare</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/torrentfreak/" title="torrentfreak" rel="tag">torrentfreak</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/10/upload-files-to-multiple-file-hosting-sites-at-one-time/" title="Upload Files to Multiple File-Hosting Sites at One Time (May 10, 2008)">Upload Files to Multiple File-Hosting Sites at One Time</a> (22)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2009/07/17/the-piratebay-to-introduce-paid-subscriptions/" title="The Piratebay To Introduce Paid Subscriptions (July 17, 2009)">The Piratebay To Introduce Paid Subscriptions</a> (14)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/11/search-rapidshare-with-rapidlibrary/" title="Search Rapidshare with Rapidlibrary (August 11, 2008)">Search Rapidshare with Rapidlibrary</a> (21)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/28/rapidshare-vs-gema/" title="Rapidshare vs. Gema (March 28, 2007)">Rapidshare vs. Gema</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/24/rapidshare-reduces-premium-user-download-limit/" title="Rapidshare Reduces Premium User Download Limit (July 24, 2008)">Rapidshare Reduces Premium User Download Limit</a> (26)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/court-orders-rapidshare-to-take-preemptive-measures-against-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapidshare vs. Gema</title>
		<link>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/28/rapidshare-vs-gema/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/28/rapidshare-vs-gema/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court-ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapidshare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/28/rapidshare-vs-gema/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rapidshare, one of the largest file hosters in the world, is currently under heavy fire in Germany. The Gema, which administers the copyrights of more than 60,000 members as well as those of over 1 million rights owners from all corners of the world managed to get a court ruling in their favor. The court ruled that the hoster could be held responsible for copyright violations committed by users who upload copyrighted material to Rapidshare servers. The court furthermore ruled that Rapidshare had to implement filters that would prevent further copyright violations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rapidshare.com/" target="_blank">Rapidshare</a>, one of the largest file hosters in the world, is currently under heavy fire in Germany. The Gema, which administers the copyrights of more than 60,000 members as well as those of over 1 million rights owners from all corners of the world managed to get a court ruling in their favor. The <a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/87445" target="_blank">court ruled (German website)</a> that the hoster could be held responsible for copyright violations committed by users who upload copyrighted material to <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/04/5-rapidshare-search-engines/">Rapidshare</a> servers. The court furthermore ruled that Rapidshare had to implement filters that would prevent further copyright violations.</p>
<p>GEMA&#8217;s Chief Executive Officer Dr. Harald Heker commented: &#8220;The Court&#8217;s decision confirms that it cannot be the task of the rights owners to control at their own cost the continued operation of services, which generate commercial profit from unlawful use of their works. This decision will also send out a major signal to all services enlisting the help of the individual users to create a comprehensive illegal offer and then in the end to use this offer for generating revenue for themselves&#8221;.</p>
<p><span id="more-1356"></span></p>
<p>Rapidshare announced the same day that they would appeal the ruling. The current ruling would have a drastic impact on every company that would operate from Germany (Europe) offering free disk space to their users. It is also important to note that it would be technically impossible to check every uploaded file if it would violate a copyright. It is for instance perfectly legal to upload a private copy of album to make it available to close friends. How would Rapidshare be able to verify if the uploaded file would violate copyright ?</p>
<p>It is in my opinion ridiculous to demand that Rapidshare, or any other company or individual who are providing webspace, is responsible for the copyright infringements of users who upload copyrighted files to the service. This would essentially mean that every webspace provider could be held responsible of a user would upload copyrighted files to rented webspace.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/court-ruling/" title="court-ruling" rel="tag">court-ruling</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/gema/" title="gema" rel="tag">gema</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/music-industry/" title="Music Industry" rel="tag">Music Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.ghacks.net/tag/rapidshare/" title="rapidshare" rel="tag">rapidshare</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2005/11/29/the-end-of-copyright/" title="The End of Copyright ? (November 29, 2005)">The End of Copyright ?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2006/07/13/music-industry-lobbys-for-copyright-shift/" title="Music Industry lobbys for Copyright Shift (July 13, 2006)">Music Industry lobbys for Copyright Shift</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/01/29/court-orders-rapidshare-to-take-preemptive-measures-against-copyright-infringement/" title="Court orders Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement (January 29, 2008)">Court orders Rapidshare to take preemptive measures against copyright infringement</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/05/21/youtomb-tracks-taken-down-videos-from-youtube/" title="Youtomb tracks taken down videos from Youtube (May 21, 2008)">Youtomb tracks taken down videos from Youtube</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/07/28/you-are-sharing-files/" title="You Are Sharing Files (July 28, 2008)">You Are Sharing Files</a> (4)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ghacks.net/2007/03/28/rapidshare-vs-gema/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
